| Literature DB >> 24455239 |
Elisabeth Streit1, Julie Millet1, Nalin Rastogi1.
Abstract
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous environmental organisms able to cause severe opportunistic human infections. Their distribution patterns are subject to geographical variations. This study describes their isolation frequencies from clinical specimen in the three French overseas departments of the Americas, namely, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and French Guiana during 1994-2012. A total of 651 strains from as many patients (one isolate per species per patient) were analysed regarding regional isolation patterns and potential pattern changes over time. The Mycobacterium avium complex was the most common group of NTM in Guadeloupe and French Guiana. In Martinique it was the second most common after the rapidly growing mycobacteria. M. fortuitum was the most commonly isolated species in all three departments. Some species (M. kansasii, M. xenopi, and M. terrae complex) displayed a clear regional preference. Furthermore a change in isolation frequency was observed for M. intracellulare (increase) and M. kansasii (decrease) in Guadeloupe. In conclusion, marked regional differences in isolation frequencies of NTM species were observed in the study area. Results are discussed in context of variables such as study populations, risk factors, methodology employed, isolation from pulmonary versus sterile isolation sites (blood, urine, and CSF), and in vitro drug-susceptibility patterns.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24455239 PMCID: PMC3880762 DOI: 10.1155/2013/472041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tuberc Res Treat ISSN: 2090-150X
Isolation patterns of the two most frequently isolated NTM species, the M. avium complex and rapidly growing mycobacteria.
| Parameters | Total |
| Rapidly growing mycobacteria | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAC |
|
| Total MAC |
|
|
| RGM | Total RGMb, c, d | ||
| Years | ||||||||||
| 1994–1998 | 158 | 39 | 23 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | 35 | 5 |
|
| 1999–2003 | 166 | 15 | 25 | 3 |
| 12 | 1 | 41 | 4 |
|
| 2004–2008 | 182 | 34 | 23 | 15 |
| 10 | 7 | 38 | 2 |
|
| 2009–2012 | 145 | 4 | 16 | 32 |
| 8 | 6 | 39 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | ||||||||||
| ≤19 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
|
| 20–39 | 122 | 27 | 38 | 6 |
| 6 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
|
| 40–54 | 166 | 24 | 26 | 15 |
| 7 | 3 | 35 | 4 |
|
| 55–69 | 125 | 5 | 11 | 17 |
| 8 | 3 | 38 | 2 |
|
| ≥70 | 130 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 10 | 7 | 41 | 6 |
|
| N/A | 90 | 26 | 7 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 20 | 1 |
|
| Sex ratio | 1.63 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.43 |
| 0.76 | 0.67 | 1.38 | 13.0 |
|
| (M/F) | (380/233) | (48/28) | (55/29) | (30/21) | (133/78) | (16/21) | (6/9) | (83/60) | (13/1) | (120/93) |
| NA | — | 16 | 3 | — |
| — | — | 10 | — |
|
| HIV | 129/96 | 43/4 | 40/8 | 5/5 | 88/17 | 0/10 | 1/5 | 15/32 | 1/2 | 17/49 |
| Department | ||||||||||
| GLP | 270 | 43 | 25 | 34 |
| 17 | 4 | 59 | 6 |
|
| MTQ | 194 | 19 | 32 | 10 |
| 13 | 10 | 56 | 3 |
|
| GUF | 187 | 30 | 30 | 7 |
| 7 | 1 | 38 | 5 |
|
| Drug-susceptibility patterne
| — | D-CS, CLOFA, RBT, CLARIT | D-CS, CLOFA, CLARIT | RIF 15, D-CS, CLOFA, CLARIT | — | None | CLARIT | AMIK, OFLO 1.5, CIPRO 1.5, SPARFLO | OFLO 1.5, CIPRO 1.5, SPARFLO | — |
aFor patients with known HIV serology; b M. flavescens isolate comprised; c M. aurum isolate comprised; d M. mucogenicum isolate comprised.
NA: not available; GLP: Guadeloupe; MTQ: Martinique; GUF: French Guiana.
eDrug-susceptibility pattern for a given NTM species was defined as ≤10% of all isolates displaying in vitro resistance [10]; AMIK: amikacin; CIPRO: ciprofloxacin; CLARIT: clarithromycin; CLOFA: clofazimine; D-CS: D-cycloserine; OFLO: ofloxacin; RBT: rifabutin; RIF: rifampin; SPARFLO: sparfloxacin. Note that drug concentration is mentioned for drugs screened at 2 different concentrations.
Isolation patterns of rarely isolated NTM species.
| Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 42 |
| Isolation year(s) | 2000 | 1995, 2002 | 2009 | 2007 (2), 2012 | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 (3), 2012 | All (except 1999, 2004, 2009) |
| Mean age | 63 | NA, 41 | 34 | 73 | 24 | 81 | 55 | 52 |
| Sex (M/F) | 0/1 | 2/0 | 1/0 | 3/0 | 1/0 | 0/1 | 3/1 | 30/7 |
| Origin | MTQ | MTQ, GUF | GLP | MTQ (1), | GUF | GLP | MTQ (1), | GLP (9), MTQ (3), GUF (30) |
| Drug susceptible toc | RIF 15, EMB, D-CS, CLOFA | OFLO 1,5 (2/2), EMB (2/2), AMIK 4 (2/2), RBT (2/2), SPARFLO (1/1), CLARIT (1/1) | No data | ETH (3/3), RIF 1 (3/3), D-CS (3/3), CLOFA (3/3), RBT (3/3), CLARIT (3/3), AMIK 20 (2/3) | ETH, RIF 1, SM, OFLO 1,5, EMB, D-CS, KANA, AMIK 4, CLOFA, RBT, CIPRO 1,5, SPARFLO 1,5, CLARIT | No data | ETH (4/4), RIF 15 (4/4), D-CS (2/3), AMIK 20 (2/4), CLOFA (4/4), CLARIT (4/4) | — |
aRGM, included in total RGM listed in Table 1.
bDistinction between these 2 closely related species was not made.
NA: not available; GLP: Guadeloupe; MTQ: Martinique; GUF: French Guiana.
cDrug-susceptibility patterns were not generalized as mentioned for other species in Tables 1 and 2 (defined as ≤10% of all isolates displaying in vitro resistance [10]); instead, the results are given per strain (numbers in brackets for more than 2 strains). AMIK: amikacin; CIPRO: ciprofloxacin; CLARIT: clarithromycin; CLOFA: clofazimine; D-CS: D-cycloserine; OFLO: ofloxacin; RBT: rifabutin; RIF: rifampin; SPARFLO: sparfloxacin. Note that drug concentration is mentioned for drugs screened at 2 different concentrations.
Figure 1Distribution patterns of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical samples in the three French departments of the Americas from 1994 to 2012. (a) Total study sample n = 651 strains (one isolate per species per patient); (b) distribution of strains per department, that is, Guadeloupe n = 270, Martinique n = 194, and French Guiana n = 187; (c) mean isolation frequency for M. kansasii and M. intracellulare in Guadeloupe and for M. terrae complex in French Guiana versus total isolates during study periods of 1994–1998, 1999–2003, 2004–2008, and 2009–2012 (numbers are shown as average number per year on secondary x-axis; mean values are illustrated to counterbalance the fact that the last interval consisted of four years).
Isolation patterns of regularly encountered NTM.
| Parameters | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | |||||||
| 1994–1998 | 158 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 3 |
| 1999–2003 | 166 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 22 | 2 |
| 2004–2008 | 182 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 2009–2012 | 145 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | |||||||
| ≤19 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 20–39 | 122 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| 40–54 | 166 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| 55–69 | 125 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| ≥70 | 130 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| NA | 90 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
| Sex ratio | 1.63 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 2 | 1.2 | 3.6 | — |
| (M/F) | (380/233) | (22/18) | (17/14) | (4/2) | (18/15) | (18/5) | (8/0) |
| NA | — | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — |
| HIV (pos/neg)a | 129/96 | 3/11 | 5/2 | NA | 9/3 | 2/2 | 0/1 |
| Department | |||||||
| GLP | 270 | 15 | 29 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 3 |
| MTQ | 194 | 21 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| GUF | 187 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 0 |
| Drug-susceptibility patternb
| — | OFLO 5, EMB, D-CS, CIPRO 1.5, SPARFLO, CLARIT | ETH, RIF 1, EMB, CLOFA, RBT, CLARIT | ETH, RIF 15, EMB, DCS | CLOFA, CLARIT | ETH, RIF 15, EMB, CLOFA, RBT, CLARIT | ETH, INH 1, OFLO, EMB, D-CS, KANA, AMIK 4, CLOFA, RBT, CIPRO 1.5, SPARFLO, CLARIT |
aFor patients with known HIV serology.
NA: not available; GLP: Guadeloupe; MTQ: Martinique; GUF: French Guiana.
bDrug-susceptibility pattern for a given NTM species was defined as ≤10% of all isolates displaying in vitro resistance [10]; AMIK: amikacin; CIPRO: ciprofloxacin; CLARIT: clarithromycin; CLOFA: clofazimine; D-CS: D-cycloserine; OFLO: ofloxacin; RBT: rifabutin; RIF: rifampin; SPARFLO: sparfloxacin. Note that drug concentration is mentioned for drugs screened at 2 different concentrations.