| Literature DB >> 24455139 |
Helena M Santos1, Maria-Rosa Paiva1, Susana Rocha2, Carole Kerdelhué3, Manuela Branco2.
Abstract
Allochrony that is reproductive isolation by time may further lead to divergence of reproductive adaptive traits in response to different environmental pressures over time. A unique "summer" population of the pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa, reproductively isolated from the typical winter populations by allochronic differentiation, is here analyzed. This allochronically shifted population reproduces in the spring and develops in the summer, whereas "winter" populations reproduce in the late summer and have winter larval development. Both summer and winter populations coexist in the same pine stands, yet they face different climatic pressures as their active stages are present in different seasons. The occurrence of significant differences between the reproductive traits of the summer population and the typical winter populations (either sympatric or allopatric) is thus hypothesized. Female fecundity, egg size, egg covering, and egg parasitism were analyzed showing that the egg load was lower and that egg size was higher in the summer population than in all the studied winter populations. The scales that cover the egg batches of T. pityocampa differed significantly between populations in shape and color, resulting in a looser and darker covering in the summer population. The single specialist egg parasitoid species of this moth was almost missing in the summer population, and the overall parasitism rates were lower than in the winter population. Results suggest the occurrence of phenotypic differentiation between the summer population and the typical T. pityocampa winter populations for the life-history traits studied. This work provides an insight into how ecological divergence may follow the process of allochronic reproductive isolation.Entities:
Keywords: Egg parasitoids; Thaumetopoea pityocampa.; egg size; fecundity; phenotypic divergence; scale covering
Year: 2013 PMID: 24455139 PMCID: PMC3892371 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Populations of Thaumetopoea pityocampa studied: location and coordinates of the pine stands, years, and number of egg batches collected. Portugal 2000–2009.
| Population | Coordinates (lat, long) | Elevation (m) | Years of sampling | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcácer do Sal | 38°23′N; 08°31′W | 50 | 2002 | 12 |
| Apostiça | 38°30′N; 09°11′W | 35 | 2000; 2003; 2005 | 163 |
| Rio Frio | 38°40′N; 08°52W | 20 | 2006 | 23 |
| Azambuja | 39°05′N; 08°53W | 100 | 2006 | 23 |
| Barrada | 39°25′N; 08°03W | 150 | 2007 | 13 |
| Abrantes | 39°33′N; 08°14′W | 160–230 | 2000; 2003 | 176 |
| Leiria SP | 39°50′N; 08°55′W | 30–50 | 2000; 2004; 2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2011 | 283 |
| Leiria WP | 39°50′N; 08°55′W | 30–50 | 2000; 2004; 2005 | 36 |
| Vila Real | 41°19′N; 07°44′W | 480 | 2003 | 30 |
Figure 1Mean parasitism rate (%) ± SE (bars) and coefficient of variance (CV) of the parasitism rates (dots) for the egg batches of eight T. pityocampa winter populations (WPs) and for the Leiria summer population (SP).
Figure 2Proportion of egg parasitoid species emerged for eight T. pityocampa winter populations (WPs) and for the Leiria summer population (SP).
Figure 3Phenology of the egg parasitoid species of T. pityocampa, observed for the Leiria summer population (SP) and adult flight periods of both Leiria SP and Leiria WP.
Pairwise comparisons using LSD (ANOVA) for the egg scales variables (Mean ± SE, n = 10 × 20 females/population) of three Thaumetopoea pityocampa populations: different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.
| Variable | Area | Straight width | Width/Length ratio | Form coefficient | Color |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leiria SP | 3.04 ± 0.11a | 1.22 ± 0.04a | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 0.60 ± 0.01a | 44.51 ± 2.12a |
| Leiria WP | 3.69 ± 0.11b | 1.57 ± 0.04b | 0.52 ± 0.00b | 0.67 ± 0.01b | 67.10 ± 2.12b |
| Apostiça | 3.84 ± 0.11b | 1.69 ± 0.04c | 0.58 ± 0.01c | 0.73 ± 0.01c | 67.04 ± 2.12b |
| 15.93 | 48.99 | 86.74 | 50.81 | 37.91 | |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Phenotypic distance | |||||
| Leiria WP – Leiria SP | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 23.39 |
| Apostiça – Leiria WP | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Apostiça – Leiria SP | 0.80 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 22.53 |
Figure 4Principal component analysis (PCA) using four phenotypic variables (area; straight width, width to length ratio, form coefficient, see text for details) and color of the egg scales of T. pityocampa, based on mean values (n = 10 × 20 females/population). The first and second PCA components explain 92% of the variance. Ellipses enclose populations for better visualization of the separation.
Figure 5Detailed images of the abdominal scales of T. pityocampa (above) and of the egg batches (below). Leiria summer population (left), Leiria winter population (center) and Apostiça winter population (right).