M T Baysari, K Oliver1, B Egan1, L Li2, K Richardson3, I Sandaradura4, J I Westbrook2, R O Day. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital , Sydney, Australia. 2. Centre for Health Systems & Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales , Sydney, Australia. 3. Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital , Sydney, Australia. 4. Department of Microbiology, St Vincent's Hospital , Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is now little doubt that improving antimicrobial use is necessary for the containment of resistance. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing individualised feedback to doctors about their recent compliance with the hospital's antibiotic policy improves compliance with the policy. METHODS: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Computerised alerts integrated into the electronic prescribing system (ePS) inform prescribers of the local antibiotic policy. We utilised prescribing data extracted from the ePS for 'audit and feedback'. Thirty-six prescribers were sent feedback letters via email. We also interviewed doctors who had received letters to explore their views of the feedback and the policy in general. RESULTS: There was no significant change in compliance with the policy following implementation of the feedback intervention (0% compliant vs 11.9%; p = 0.07). Several problems with the policy and the approval process were identified by researchers during auditing and by prescribers during interviews. Some problems identified made it difficult to accurately assess compliance and for doctors to comply with the policy. CONCLUSION: Our intervention did not result in improved compliance with the antibiotic policy but revealed practical problems with the policy and approval process that had not been identified prior to the trial. Greater support for the policy by senior doctors and the assignment of more clearly defined roles and responsibilities associated with antibiotic use and approval may result in improved compliance. Harnessing the full potential of technology would streamline the antimicrobial approval process and allow more efficient and reliable monitoring of antibiotic use and compliance. Many of the problems we identified are generic issues of importance to all organisations seeking to integrate antimicrobial stewardship into ePS.
BACKGROUND: There is now little doubt that improving antimicrobial use is necessary for the containment of resistance. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing individualised feedback to doctors about their recent compliance with the hospital's antibiotic policy improves compliance with the policy. METHODS: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Computerised alerts integrated into the electronic prescribing system (ePS) inform prescribers of the local antibiotic policy. We utilised prescribing data extracted from the ePS for 'audit and feedback'. Thirty-six prescribers were sent feedback letters via email. We also interviewed doctors who had received letters to explore their views of the feedback and the policy in general. RESULTS: There was no significant change in compliance with the policy following implementation of the feedback intervention (0% compliant vs 11.9%; p = 0.07). Several problems with the policy and the approval process were identified by researchers during auditing and by prescribers during interviews. Some problems identified made it difficult to accurately assess compliance and for doctors to comply with the policy. CONCLUSION: Our intervention did not result in improved compliance with the antibiotic policy but revealed practical problems with the policy and approval process that had not been identified prior to the trial. Greater support for the policy by senior doctors and the assignment of more clearly defined roles and responsibilities associated with antibiotic use and approval may result in improved compliance. Harnessing the full potential of technology would streamline the antimicrobial approval process and allow more efficient and reliable monitoring of antibiotic use and compliance. Many of the problems we identified are generic issues of importance to all organisations seeking to integrate antimicrobial stewardship into ePS.
Keywords:
Antibiotic; audit and feedback; compliance; electronic prescribing
Authors: Iruka N Okeke; Ramanan Laxminarayan; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Adriano G Duse; Philip Jenkins; Thomas F O'Brien; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Keith P Klugman Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Jessina C McGregor; Elizabeth Weekes; Graeme N Forrest; Harold C Standiford; Eli N Perencevich; Jon P Furuno; Anthony D Harris Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-04-18 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Karin A Thursky; Kirsty L Buising; Narin Bak; Lachlan Macgregor; Alan C Street; C Raina Macintyre; Jeffrey J Presneill; John F Cade; Graham V Brown Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2006-01-13 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: K L Buising; K A Thursky; M B Robertson; J F Black; A C Street; M J Richards; G V Brown Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Melissa T Baysari; Jessica Del Gigante; Maria Moran; Indy Sandaradura; Ling Li; Katrina L Richardson; Anmol Sandhu; Elin C Lehnbom; Johanna I Westbrook; Richard O Day Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Peter Davey; Charis A Marwick; Claire L Scott; Esmita Charani; Kirsty McNeil; Erwin Brown; Ian M Gould; Craig R Ramsay; Susan Michie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-02-09
Authors: Courtney A Gidengil; Ateev Mehrotra; Scott Beach; Claude Setodji; Gerald Hunter; Jeffrey A Linder Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 5.128