BACKGROUND: Kidney disease is under-documented in physician notes. The use of template-guided notes may improve physician recognition of kidney disease early in training. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a computerized inpatient renal template note with clinical decision support improves resident knowledge and documentation of kidney disease. METHODS: In this prospective study, first year medical residents were encouraged to use the renal template note for documentation over a one-month period. The renal template note included an option for classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) categories with a link to standard classifications. Pre- and post-knowledge of AKI and CKD categories was tested with a quiz and surveys of resident experience with the intervention were conducted. Appropriate AKI and/or CKD classification was determined in 100 renal template notes and 112 comparable historical internal medicine resident progress notes from approximately one year prior. RESULTS: 2,435 inpatient encounters amongst 15 residents who participated were documented using the renal template note. A significantly higher percent of residents correctly staged earlier stage CKD (CKD3) using the renal template note compared to historical notes (9/46 vs. 0/33, p<0.01). Documentation of AKI and more advanced CKD stages (CKD4 and 5) did not improve. Knowledge based on quiz scores increased modestly but was not significant. The renal template note was well received by residents and was perceived as helping improve knowledge and documentation of kidney disease. CONCLUSION: The renal template note significantly improved staging of earlier stage CKD (CKD3) with a modest but non-significant improvement in resident knowledge. Given the importance of early recognition and treatment of CKD, future studies should focus on teaching early recognition using template notes with supplemental educational interventions.
BACKGROUND:Kidney disease is under-documented in physician notes. The use of template-guided notes may improve physician recognition of kidney disease early in training. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a computerized inpatient renal template note with clinical decision support improves resident knowledge and documentation of kidney disease. METHODS: In this prospective study, first year medical residents were encouraged to use the renal template note for documentation over a one-month period. The renal template note included an option for classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) categories with a link to standard classifications. Pre- and post-knowledge of AKI and CKD categories was tested with a quiz and surveys of resident experience with the intervention were conducted. Appropriate AKI and/or CKD classification was determined in 100 renal template notes and 112 comparable historical internal medicine resident progress notes from approximately one year prior. RESULTS: 2,435 inpatient encounters amongst 15 residents who participated were documented using the renal template note. A significantly higher percent of residents correctly staged earlier stage CKD (CKD3) using the renal template note compared to historical notes (9/46 vs. 0/33, p<0.01). Documentation of AKI and more advanced CKD stages (CKD4 and 5) did not improve. Knowledge based on quiz scores increased modestly but was not significant. The renal template note was well received by residents and was perceived as helping improve knowledge and documentation of kidney disease. CONCLUSION: The renal template note significantly improved staging of earlier stage CKD (CKD3) with a modest but non-significant improvement in resident knowledge. Given the importance of early recognition and treatment of CKD, future studies should focus on teaching early recognition using template notes with supplemental educational interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical decision support systems; electronic medical records; kidney disease; medical education; templates
Authors: Kraig S Kinchen; John Sadler; Nancy Fink; Ronald Brookmeyer; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-09-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Chester H Fox; Andrew Swanson; Linda S Kahn; Katheryn Glaser; Brian M Murray Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Chester H Fox; Amanda Brooks; Luis E Zayas; William McClellan; Brian Murray Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Michael B Rothberg; Eileen D Kehoe; Abbie L Courtemanche; Thabo Kenosi; Penelope S Pekow; Maura J Brennan; Jeffrey G Mulhern; Gregory L Braden Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eli Farhy; Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis; Rebecca M Doerfler; Wanda J Fink; Min Zhan; Jeffrey C Fink Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Eric A J Hoste; Kianoush Kashani; Noel Gibney; F Perry Wilson; Claudio Ronco; Stuart L Goldstein; John A Kellum; Sean M Bagshaw Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2016-02-26