Literature DB >> 24454543

Nanoinformatics workshop report: Current resources, community needs, and the proposal of a collaborative framework for data sharing and information integration.

Stacey L Harper1, James E Hutchison2, Nathan Baker3, Michele Ostraat4, Sally Tinkle5, Jeffrey Steevens6, Mark D Hoover7, Jessica Adamick8, Krishna Rajan9, Sharon Gaheen10, Yoram Cohen11, Andre Nel12, Raul E Cachau13, Mark Tuominen14.   

Abstract

The quantity of information on nanomaterial properties and behavior continues to grow rapidly. Without a concerted effort to collect, organize and mine disparate information coming out of current research efforts, the value and effective use of this information will be limited at best. Data will not be translated to knowledge. At worst, erroneous conclusions will be drawn and future research may be misdirected. Nanoinformatics can be a powerful approach to enhance the value of global information in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Much progress has been made through grassroots efforts in nanoinformatics resulting in a multitude of resources and tools for nanoscience researchers. In 2012, the nanoinformatics community believed it was important to critically evaluate and refine currently available nanoinformatics approaches in order to best inform the science and support the future of predictive nanotechnology. The Greener Nano 2012: Nanoinformatics Tools and Resources Workshop brought together informatics groups with materials scientists active in nanoscience research to evaluate and reflect on the tools and resources that have recently emerged in support of predictive nanotechnology. The workshop goals were to establish a better understanding of current nanoinformatics approaches and to clearly define immediate and projected informatics infrastructure needs of the nanotechnology community. The theme of nanotechnology environmental health and safety (nanoEHS) was used to provide real-world, concrete examples on how informatics can be utilized to advance our knowledge and guide nanoscience. The benefit here is that the same properties that impact the performance of products could also be the properties that inform EHS. From a decision management standpoint, the dual use of such data should be considered a priority. Key outcomes include a proposed collaborative framework for data collection, data sharing and information integration.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24454543      PMCID: PMC3895330          DOI: 10.1088/1749-4699/6/1/014008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Sci Discov        ISSN: 1749-4699


  6 in total

Review 1.  Informatics and standards for nanomedicine technology.

Authors:  Dennis G Thomas; Fred Klaessig; Stacey L Harper; Martin Fritts; Mark D Hoover; Sharon Gaheen; Todd H Stokes; Rebecca Reznik-Zellen; Elaine T Freund; Juli D Klemm; David S Paik; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2011-06-30

2.  Nano-SAR development for bioactivity of nanoparticles with considerations of decision boundaries.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Robert Rallo; Ralph Weissleder; Carlos Tassa; Stanley Shaw; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Small       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  NanoParticle Ontology for cancer nanotechnology research.

Authors:  Dennis G Thomas; Rohit V Pappu; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Standardizing data.

Authors:  Nathan A Baker; Juli D Klemm; Stacey L Harper; Sharon Gaheen; Mervi Heiskanen; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  ISA-TAB-Nano: a specification for sharing nanomaterial research data in spreadsheet-based format.

Authors:  Dennis G Thomas; Sharon Gaheen; Stacey L Harper; Martin Fritts; Fred Klaessig; Elizabeth Hahn-Dantona; David Paik; Sue Pan; Grace A Stafford; Elaine T Freund; Juli D Klemm; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  The Nanomaterial Registry: facilitating the sharing and analysis of data in the diverse nanomaterial community.

Authors:  Michele L Ostraat; Karmann C Mills; Kimberly A Guzan; Damaris Murry
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-09-16
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Nanocuration workflows: Establishing best practices for identifying, inputting, and sharing data to inform decisions on nanomaterials.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Karmann A Mills; Stephanie A Morris; Fred Klaessig; Sharon Gaheen; Nastassja Lewinski; Christine Ogilvie Hendren
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity.

Authors:  Bryan Harper; Dennis Thomas; Satish Chikkagoudar; Nathan Baker; Kaizhi Tang; Alejandro Heredia-Langner; Roberto Lins; Stacey Harper
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Framework for automatic information extraction from research papers on nanocrystal devices.

Authors:  Thaer M Dieb; Masaharu Yoshioka; Shinjiro Hara; Marcus C Newton
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.