| Literature DB >> 24453625 |
Guangrong Yu1, Kai Chen1, Tao Yu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To introduce the design of a butterfly-shaped plate and its application in the treatment of calcaneal fractures, and to discuss its clinical indications, advantages and disadvantages.Entities:
Keywords: Bone plates; Calcaneus; Fracture Fixation, internal
Year: 2012 PMID: 24453625 PMCID: PMC3861953 DOI: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000600002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ortop Bras ISSN: 1413-7852 Impact factor: 0.513
Figure 1Design of the plate and fixation mode.
Figure 2Anatomy around the incision.
Distance from intersections of important tissues and four measurement lines to the tip of the lateral malleolus (χ ± Ѕ mm).
| Measurement Line | No. of Samples | Saphenous Vein | Dorsal lateral sural cutaneous nerve | Longperoneal muscletendon | Peroneus brevis tendon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line LA | 20 | 17.29±5.06(7.84 ~ 26.5) | 15.68±4.26(8.26 ~ 27.62) | 6.18±1.48(3.08 ~ 9.38) | 2.88±0.97(1.24 ~ 4.54) |
| Line LB | 20 | 15.91±5.44(2.62 ~ 26.8) | 14.36±3.51(7.82 ~ 22.18) | 7.28±1.39(3.72 ~ 9.64) | 3.63±1.29(1.22 ~ 6.12) |
| Line LC | 20 | 18.15±5.54(2.24 ~ 26.72) | 17.19±3.87(11.12 ~ 9.34) | 10.70±2.49(6.18 ~ 15.92) | 5.93±1.72(3.26 ~ 8.86) |
| Line LD | 20 | 36.49±5.91(21.68 ~ 44.32) | 41.35±6.39(29.46 ~ 56.20) | Under the connecting line | 38.18±7.06(28.42~66.64) |
Figure 3Comparison between preoperative aspect and one year after surgery.
Comparison of relevant indicators before and after surgery (χ ± Ѕ).
| Indicator | No. of Cases | Preop | Postop | T Value | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Böhler angle (o) | 21 | -17.6±1.5 | 29.0±2.2 | 32.52 | <0.01 |
| Gissane angle (o) | 21 | 103.4±4.9 | 121.8±3.8 | 12.98 | <0.01 |
| Calcaneus axial length (mm) | 21 | 52.5±3.8 | 57.1±3.2 | 3.67 | <0.01 |
| Calcaneus horizontal length (mm) | 21 | 70.0±3.5 | 71.4±2.1 | 2.12 | >0.05 |
| Tuberalis height(mm) | 21 | 47.8±1.9 | 48.2±1.8 | 0.61 | >0.05 |
| Calcaneal height at thalamus (mm) | 21 | 36.8±2.3 | 38.6±1.2 | 2.84 | <0.01 |
| Calcaneus width (mm) | 21 | 40.2±3.0 | 33.4±1.7 | 6.27 | <0.01 |
| Talar tilt angle (o) | 21 | 10.9±1.0 | 14.6±1.4 | 12.78 | <0.01 |
Maryland Foot Score system.
| Parameter | Score |
|---|---|
|
| |
| None: including with sports | 45 |
| Slight: no change in ADL or work | 40 |
| Mild: minimal change in ADL or work | 35 |
| Moderate: significant decrease in ADL | 30 |
| Marked: during minimal ADL, e.g., using the bathroom, performing simple housework | |
| Stronger, more frequent analgesic | 10 |
| Disabled: unable to work or shop | 5 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Unlimited | 10 |
| Slight limitation | 8 |
| Moderate limitation (2-3 blocks) | 5 |
| Severe limitation (2-3 blocks) | 2 |
| Indoors only | 0 |
|
| |
| Normal | 4 |
| Weak feeling - no true giving way | 3 |
| Occasional giving way(1-2 months) | 2 |
| Frequent giving way | 1 |
| Orthotic device use | 0 |
|
| |
| None | 4 |
| Cane | 3 |
| Crutches | 1 |
| Wheelchair | 0 |
|
| |
| None | 4 |
| Slight | 3 |
| Moderate | 2 |
| Severe | 1 |
| Unable to walk | 0 |
|
| |
| Any type | 10 |
| Minor concessions | 9 |
| Flat, laced | 7 |
| Without orthotics | 5 |
| Larger shoes | 2 |
| Unable to wear shoes | 0 |
|
| |
| Normally | 4 |
| With bannister | 3 |
| Any method | 2 |
| Unable | 0 |
|
| |
| No problem with any surface | 4 |
| Problems on stones, hills | 2 |
| Problems on flat surfaces | 0 |
|
| |
| Normal | 10 |
| Mild deformity | 8 |
| Moderate | 6 |
| Severe | 0 |
| Multiple deformities | 0 |
|
| |
| Normal | 5 |
| Slightly decreased | 4 |
| Markedly decreased | 2 |
| Ankylosed | 0 |
Excellent, 90-100; good, 75-89; fair, 50-74; failure, < 50.
Results compared by fracture type.
| Fracture/Type | Excellent | Good | Fair | Failure | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| III | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 21 |