Literature DB >> 24452774

Haemophilia A mutations in patients with non-severe phenotype associated with a discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity assays.

Anna Pavlova, Daniel Delev, Behnaz Pezeshkpoor, Jens Müller, Johannes Oldenburg1.   

Abstract

About one-third of patients with non-severe haemophilia A (HA) show a discrepancy of factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) measured by one-stage (FVIII:C1st), two-stage assays or the chromogenic method (FVIII:Cchr). The aim of the study was to characterise the mutation profile in patients with FVIII:C assay discrepancies. FVIII:C discrepancy was considered significant if the calculated ratio between FVIII:C1st and FVIII:Cchr was ≤ 0.6. In 16 patients FVIII:C1st was higher than FVIII:Cchr. The reversephenomenon was observed in 83 patients. Genetic analysis revealed 23 different missense mutations of which 17 were novel. Most mutations, exhibiting a higher FVIII:C1st were localised in the A1-A2-A3 interface. The majority of mutations associated with FVIII:Cchr>FVIII:C1st discrepancy were located close to or within the thrombin cleavage sites, FIX or vWF binding sites. Our data show a correlation between FVIII:C and thrombin generation testing with a clear differentiation between patients with haemophilia and normal controls. However, in the subgroup of FVIII:C1st>FVIII:Cchr discrepancy, the endogenous thrombin potential and peak thrombin parameters were similar to non-discrepant haemophilia patients, while in the inverse discrepancy FVIII:Cchr>FVIII:C1st, these variables showed values close to that of the normal control group. Certain hereditary F8 missense mutations cause discrepancy in FVIII:C as measured with different assays. This can lead to failure in diagnosing HA or incorrectly classifying the severity of the disease. Therefore, we recommend that initial diagnosis of non-severe HA phenotypes should be based on results of both FVIII:C1st and FVIII:Cchr assays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haemophilia A; discrepant assay; missense mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452774     DOI: 10.1160/TH13-08-0690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  15 in total

Review 1.  Position paper on laboratory testing for patients with haemophilia. A consensus document from SISET, AICE, SIBioC and SIPMeL.

Authors:  Armando Tripodi; Rita C Santoro; Sophie Testa; Angelo C Molinari; Sergio Bernardini; Maria Golato; Giuseppe Lippi; Walter Ageno; Elena Santagostino
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Diagnosis and care of patients with mild haemophilia: practical recommendations for clinical management.

Authors:  Gary Benson; Günter Auerswald; Gerry Dolan; Anne Duffy; Cedric Hermans; Rolf Ljung; Massimo Morfini; Silva Zupančić Šalek
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients.

Authors:  Tarek M Owaidah; Hazzaa A Alzahrani; Nouf S Al-Numair; Abdulmjeed O Alnosair; Amelita M Aguilos; Mahasen Saleh
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2020-09-09

4.  Activity of transgene-produced B-domain-deleted factor VIII in human plasma following AAV5 gene therapy.

Authors:  Steffen Rosen; Stefan Tiefenbacher; Mary Robinson; Mei Huang; Jaydeep Srimani; Donnie Mackenzie; Terri Christianson; K John Pasi; Savita Rangarajan; Emily Symington; Adam Giermasz; Glenn F Pierce; Benjamin Kim; Stephen J Zoog; Christian Vettermann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Life-threatening bleeding in a patient with mild hemophilia A and heterozygosity for von Willebrand disease Type 2N.

Authors:  John N Allan; Kenneth D Friedman; Maria T DeSancho
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Haemophilia.

Authors:  Erik Berntorp; Kathelijn Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Maria Elisa Mancuso; David Stephensen; Amy D Shapiro; Victor Blanchette
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Clustered F8 missense mutations cause hemophilia A by combined alteration of splicing and protein biosynthesis and activity.

Authors:  Irving Donadon; John H McVey; Isabella Garagiola; Alessio Branchini; Mimosa Mortarino; Flora Peyvandi; Francesco Bernardi; Mirko Pinotti
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  An in silico and in vitro approach to elucidate the impact of residues flanking the cleavage scissile bonds of FVIII.

Authors:  Behnaz Pezeshkpoor; Ursula Schreck; Arijit Biswas; Julia Driesen; Ann-Cristin Berkemeier; Anna Pavlova; Jens Müller; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Richard A Marlar; Karin Strandberg; Midori Shima; Dorothy M Adcock
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Hemophilia management: Huge impact of a tiny difference.

Authors:  Fabienne Kloosterman; Anne-Fleur Zwagemaker; Amal Abdi; Samantha Gouw; Giancarlo Castaman; Karin Fijnvandraat
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.