Literature DB >> 24452720

Microsatellite instability typing in serum and tissue of patients with colorectal cancer: comparing real time PCR with hybridization probe and high-performance liquid chromatography.

P Mokarram1, M Rismanchi, M Alizadeh Naeeni, S Mirab Samiee, M Paryan, A Alipour, Z Honardar, S Kavousipour, F Naghibalhossaini, Z Mostafavi-Pour, A Monabati, S V Hosseni, S A Shamsdin.   

Abstract

Allelic variation of BAT-25 (a 25-repeat quasimonomorphic poly T) and BAT-26 (a 26-repeat quasimonomorphic polyA) loci as two mononucleotide microsatellite markers, were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) compared with Real-Time PCR using hybridization probes. BAT-26 and BAT-25 markers were used to determine an appropriate screening technique with high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose microsatellite instability (MSI) status in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). One of the pathways in colorectal tumor genesis is microsatellite instability (MSI+). MSI is detected in about 15% of all CRCs; 3% are of these are associated with Lynch syndrome and the other 12% are caused by sporadic. Colorectal tumors with MSI have distinctive features compared with microsatellite stable tumors. Due to the high percentage of MSI+ CRC in Iran, screening of this type of CRC is imperative. Two markers were analyzed in tissues and sera of 44 normal volunteers and tumor and matched normal mucosal tissues as well as sera of 44 patients with sporadic CRC. The sensitivity and specificity of BAT-26 with real time PCR method (Hybridization probe) were 100% in comparison with sequencing method as the gold standard, while HPLC had a lower sensitivity and specificity. According to HPLC data, BAT-26 was more sensitive than BAT-25 in identifying MSI tumors. Therefore, MSI typing using the BAT-26 hybridization probe method compared to HPLC could be considered as an accurate method for diagnosing MSI in CRC tumors but not in serum circulating DNAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452720     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3138-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  29 in total

Review 1.  Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features.

Authors:  J R Jass
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  DNA mismatch repair defects: role in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sandrine Jacob; Françoise Praz
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.079

3.  Next generation sequencing of serum circulating nucleic acids from patients with invasive ductal breast cancer reveals differences to healthy and nonmalignant controls.

Authors:  Julia Beck; Howard B Urnovitz; William M Mitchell; Ekkehard Schütz
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  Detection of microsatellite instability by real time PCR and hybridization probe melting point analysis.

Authors:  W Dietmaier; F Hofstädter
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  BAT-26 and BAT-40 instability in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas and germline polymorphisms.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; M L Slattery; J D Potter; M F Leppert
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Genomic analysis of circulating cell-free DNA infers breast cancer dormancy.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Shaw; Karen Page; Kevin Blighe; Natasha Hava; David Guttery; Becky Ward; James Brown; Chetana Ruangpratheep; Justin Stebbing; Rachel Payne; Carlo Palmieri; Suzy Cleator; Rosemary A Walker; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  High throughput detection of microsatellite instability by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Kai-feng Pan; Wanguo Liu; You-Yong Lu; Lian Zhang; Zhen-pu Li; Wan-Li Lu; Stephen N Thibodeau; Wei-Cheng You
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Mononucleotide repeats BAT-26 and BAT-25 accurately detect MSI-H tumors and predict tumor content: implications for population screening.

Authors:  Caroline Brennetot; Olivier Buhard; Florence Jourdan; Jean-François Flejou; Alex Duval; Richard Hamelin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Routinely assessed morphological features correlate with microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Destin Black; Amanda J Hummer; Jeff Boyd; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Impact of BRAF, MLH1 on the incidence of microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer in populations based study.

Authors:  Hassan Brim; Pooneh Mokarram; Fakhraddin Naghibalhossaini; Mehdi Saberi-Firoozi; Mansour Al-Mandhari; Kamla Al-Mawaly; Rayhaneh Al-Mjeni; Abeer Al-Sayegh; Sandy Raeburn; Edward Lee; Francis Giardiello; Duane T Smoot; Alexander Vilkin; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel; Mitra Hafezi; Mehdi Nouraie; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The Utility of Repetitive Cell-Free DNA in Cancer Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Ugur Gezer; Abel J Bronkhorst; Stefan Holdenrieder
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Tumor microsatellite instability and clinicopathologic features in Iranian colorectal cancer patients at risk for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Mehrdad Zeinalian; Morteza Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori; Rasoul Salehi; Mohammad Kazemi; Mohammad Hassan Emami
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Fisher linear discriminant analysis for classification and prediction of genomic susceptibility to stomach and colorectal cancers based on six STR loci in a northern Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Shuhong Hao; Ming Ren; Dong Li; Yujie Sui; Qingyu Wang; Gaoyang Chen; Zhaoyan Li; Qiwei Yang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Detection of Microsatellite Instability by High-Resolution Melting Analysis in Colorectal Cancer

Authors:  Nafiseh Raji; Tayebeh Majidi Zadeh; Pegah Babheidarian; Massoud Houshmand
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2022-01-01

5.  Worldwide variation in lynch syndrome screening: case for universal screening in low colorectal cancer prevalence areas.

Authors:  George Kunnackal John; Vipin Das Villgran; Christine Caufield-Noll; Francis Giardiello
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Cell-free DNA as a diagnostic marker for cancer: current insights.

Authors:  Samanta Salvi; Giorgia Gurioli; Ugo De Giorgi; Vincenza Conteduca; Gianluca Tedaldi; Daniele Calistri; Valentina Casadio
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Structural variation and its potential impact on genome instability: Novel discoveries in the EGFR landscape by long-read sequencing.

Authors:  George W Cook; Michael G Benton; Wallace Akerley; George F Mayhew; Cynthia Moehlenkamp; Denise Raterman; Daniel L Burgess; William J Rowell; Christine Lambert; Kevin Eng; Jenny Gu; Primo Baybayan; John T Fussell; Heath D Herbold; John M O'Shea; Thomas K Varghese; Lyska L Emerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients With a Plasma-Based Real-Time PCR Analysis.

Authors:  Namjoo Kim; Sung Min Kim; Beom Jae Lee; Byung Il Choi; Hee Sook Yoon; Sang Hee Kang; Seung Han Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Jong-Jae Park; Chungyeul Kim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.