BACKGROUND: Despite hints about the high incidence of pain patients misreporting their pain medication use, there are only a few non-controlled studies on the topic that focus solely on opioids. OBJECTIVE: Using toxicological analyses in a cross-sectional study, we investigated patients' reliability regarding their report of any current pain medication use. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A comprehensive pain center and a surgical unit of a German University Hospital. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients at their first visit to the pain clinic (PG, n = 243) and pre-surgical control patients (SG, n = 100) suffering from pain reported on their current pain medication. The patients' reports were verified in serum and urine using specific toxicological methods. Two types of noncompliance were defined: under-reporting (detection of non-reported substances) and over-reporting (reported substances undetectable). The impact of clinical parameters on compliance was investigated using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of noncompliance was significantly higher in the PG (43.3%) than in the SG (24%; P < 0.05). Under-reporting occurred similarly in both groups (31% PG; 23% SG), whereas over-reporting predominantly appeared in the PG (11% vs. 2%; P < 0.05). Opioids were not most frequently under-reported, but the highest proportion of under-reported drugs (under-reported in relation to detection incidence) was found for non-opioid analgesics (NSAIDs: 29% PG; 25% SG; other: 42% PG; 32% SG) and psychotropic drugs (35% PG; 53% SG). In the PG, logistic regression revealed high depression scores to be predictive for noncompliance (odds ratio 2.12). LIMITATIONS: Due to lack of a structured follow-up interview motives of under- and over-reporting stay speculative. CONCLUSIONS: Under-reporting of non-opioid analgesics is the main type of noncompliance, a disquieting fact in light of their toxicity and adverse effects. Further research is required in terms of drug assessment and compliance improvement strategies in pain clinics; therefore, toxicological monitoring is indispensable. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01625065; Medi-3889-10.
BACKGROUND: Despite hints about the high incidence of painpatients misreporting their pain medication use, there are only a few non-controlled studies on the topic that focus solely on opioids. OBJECTIVE: Using toxicological analyses in a cross-sectional study, we investigated patients' reliability regarding their report of any current pain medication use. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A comprehensive pain center and a surgical unit of a German University Hospital. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients at their first visit to the pain clinic (PG, n = 243) and pre-surgical control patients (SG, n = 100) suffering from pain reported on their current pain medication. The patients' reports were verified in serum and urine using specific toxicological methods. Two types of noncompliance were defined: under-reporting (detection of non-reported substances) and over-reporting (reported substances undetectable). The impact of clinical parameters on compliance was investigated using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of noncompliance was significantly higher in the PG (43.3%) than in the SG (24%; P < 0.05). Under-reporting occurred similarly in both groups (31% PG; 23% SG), whereas over-reporting predominantly appeared in the PG (11% vs. 2%; P < 0.05). Opioids were not most frequently under-reported, but the highest proportion of under-reported drugs (under-reported in relation to detection incidence) was found for non-opioid analgesics (NSAIDs: 29% PG; 25% SG; other: 42% PG; 32% SG) and psychotropic drugs (35% PG; 53% SG). In the PG, logistic regression revealed high depression scores to be predictive for noncompliance (odds ratio 2.12). LIMITATIONS: Due to lack of a structured follow-up interview motives of under- and over-reporting stay speculative. CONCLUSIONS: Under-reporting of non-opioid analgesics is the main type of noncompliance, a disquieting fact in light of their toxicity and adverse effects. Further research is required in terms of drug assessment and compliance improvement strategies in pain clinics; therefore, toxicological monitoring is indispensable. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01625065; Medi-3889-10.
Authors: Winfried Häuser; Fritjof Bock; Peter Engeser; Thomas Tölle; Anne Willweber-Strumpfe; Frank Petzke Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Bethea A Kleykamp; Jerry Draper-Rodi; Jan Vollert; Jessica Chan; McKenzie Ferguson; Ewan McNicol; Jules Phalip; Scott R Evans; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Andrew S C Rice Journal: Pain Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 6.961