Literature DB >> 24452604

Assessing "economic value": symbolic-number mappings predict risky and riskless valuations.

Dan R Schley1, Ellen Peters.   

Abstract

Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is a basic tenet of economic and psychological models of judgment and choice, but its determinants are little understood. In the research reported here, we tested whether insensitivities in valuations of dollar amounts (e.g., $40, $100) may be due to inexact mappings of symbolic numbers (i.e., "40," "100") onto mental magnitudes. In three studies, we demonstrated that inexact mappings appear to guide valuation and mediate numeracy's relations with riskless valuations (Studies 1 and 1a) and risky choices (Study 2). The results highlight the fundamental notion that individuals' valuations of $100 depend critically on how individuals perceive and map the symbolic quantity "100." This notion has implications for conceptualizations of value, risk aversion, intertemporal choice, and dual-process theories of decision making. Normative implications are also briefly discussed.

Keywords:  decision making; dual processes; individual differences; intertemporal choice; mathematical ability; numeracy; numerical cognition; risk aversion; valuation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452604     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613515485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

1.  The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion.

Authors:  Andrea L Patalano; Jason R Saltiel; Laura Machlin; Hilary Barth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Subjective numeracy and preference to stay with the status quo.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Meaghan Cunningham; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2017-05-29

Review 4.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Risk approximation in decision making: approximative numeric abilities predict advantageous decisions under objective risk.

Authors:  Silke M Mueller; Johannes Schiebener; Margarete Delazer; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-01-22

6.  The role of ANS acuity and numeracy for the calibration and the coherence of subjective probability judgments.

Authors:  Anders Winman; Peter Juslin; Marcus Lindskog; Håkan Nilsson; Neda Kerimi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-05

7.  Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes.

Authors:  Emanuel Querino; Lafaiete Dos Santos; Giuliano Ginani; Eduardo Nicolau; Débora Miranda; Marco Romano-Silva; Leandro Malloy-Diniz
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.757

8.  Compassion fade: affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need.

Authors:  Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; Marcus Mayorga; Ellen Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Divergence and Convergence of Risky Decision Making Across Prospective Gains and Losses: Preferences and Strategies.

Authors:  Yoanna A Kurnianingsih; O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The effect of fast and slow decisions on risk taking.

Authors:  Michael Kirchler; David Andersson; Caroline Bonn; Magnus Johannesson; Erik Ø Sørensen; Matthias Stefan; Gustav Tinghög; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2017-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.