Literature DB >> 2445213

Magnetic resonance imaging of knee hyaline cartilage and intraarticular pathology.

E Wojtys1, M Wilson, K Buckwalter, E Braunstein, W Martel.   

Abstract

Injuries to the hyaline cartilage of the knee joint are difficult to diagnose without invasive techniques. Even though these defects may be the most important prognostic factors in assessing knee joint injury, they are usually not diagnosed until arthrotomy or arthroscopy. Once injuries to hyaline cartilage are found and/or treated, no technique exists to follow these over time. Plain radiographs, arthrograms, and even computed tomography fail to detail most hyaline cartilage defects. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate five fresh frozen cadaver limbs and 10 patients whose pathology was known from arthrotomy or arthroscopic examination. Using a 0.35 Tesla superconducting magnet and spin-echo imaging technique with a head coil, we found that intraarticular fluid or air helped to delineate hyaline cartilage pathology. The multiplane capability of MRI proved to be excellent in detailing small (3 mm or more) defects on the femoral condyles and patellar surface. Cruciate ligaments were best visualized on sagittal oblique projections while meniscal pathology was best seen on true sagittal and coronal projections. MRI shows great promise in providing a noninvasive technique of evaluating hyaline cartilage defects, their response to treatment, and detailed anatomical information about cruciate ligaments and menisci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2445213     DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jingzhou Yang; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kan Yue; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Are fluoroquinolones safe in children?

Authors:  N K Arora
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis and magnetic resonance imaging: potential and problems.

Authors:  C W Hutton; W Vennart
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Articular cartilage defects of the knee: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and gross pathology.

Authors:  R L Karvonen; W G Negendank; S M Fraser; M D Mayes; T An; F Fernandez-Madrid
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging reflects cartilage proteoglycan degradation in the rabbit knee.

Authors:  P K Paul; E O'Byrne; V Blancuzzi; D Wilson; D Gunson; F L Douglas; J Z Wang; R S Mezrich
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of patellar cartilage lesions: a prospective study.

Authors:  J A Vallotton; R A Meuli; P F Leyvraz; M Landry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The morphology of articular cartilage assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Reproducibility and anatomical correlation.

Authors:  F Eckstein; H Sittek; S Milz; R Putz; M Reiser
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: current status, new directions.

Authors:  P L Munk; C A Helms; H K Genant; R G Holt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  MRI of the knee joint with a 3-D gradient echo sequence. Equivalent to diagnostic arthroscopy?

Authors:  K Glückert; B Kladny; A Blank-Schäl; G Hofmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Magnetic resonance in cartilaginous lesions of the knee joint with three-dimensional gradient-echo imaging.

Authors:  M F Reiser; G Bongartz; R Erlemann; M Strobel; T Pauly; K Gaebert; U Stoeber; P E Peters
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.