Literature DB >> 24451941

A matched cohort study of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer without serosa invasion.

Jianxian Lin1, Changming Huang2, Chaohui Zheng1, Ping Li1, Jianwei Xie1, Jiabin Wang1, Jun Lu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) with extended lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study compared the technical feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy of LATG with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for AGC without serosa invasion.
METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2011, 235 patients underwent LATG and 153 patients underwent OTG for AGC without serosa invasion. Age, gender, and depth of invasion (pT2 and pT3) were matched by propensity scoring, and 116 patients (58 LATG and 58 OTG) were selected for analysis. Their clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival were compared.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two propensity-matched groups. Median number of lymph nodes per patient was 29, and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar in the LATG and OTG groups (30.8±10.2 vs. 29.0±8.3). Peri-operative characteristics, operation time, number of transfused units per patient, and time to resumption of activities were similar in the two groups; while blood loss, times to first flatus and resumption of soft diet, and post-operative stay were significantly lower in the LATG group (P < 0.05, respectively). Rates of post-operative complications (12.1% vs. 15.5%) and postoperative mortality (0% vs. 1.7%), as well as cumulative survival rates, were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: LATG with D2 lymphadenectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for AGC patients without serosa invasion. Prospective, multicenter, randomized trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of LATG in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24451941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  N Coburn; R Cosby; L Klein; G Knight; R Malthaner; J Mamazza; C D Mercer; J Ringash
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Jun Kimura; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Akiharu Kimura; Kyoichi Ogata; Norimichi Kogure; Toru Yanoma; Masaki Suzuki; Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Tetsuro Ohno; Erito Mochiki; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongpu Yang; Yuyan Chen; Yilin Hu; Ying Feng; Qinsheng Mao; Wanjiang Xue
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Zu Chen; Lei Wen; Yuan-Yi Rui; Chao-Xu Liu; Qing-Chuan Zhao; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shihou Sheng; Yahong Chen; Chunsheng Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Xingyu Feng; Xin Chen; Zaisheng Ye; Wenjun Xiong; Xueqing Yao; Wei Wang; Junjiang Wang; Luchuan Chen; Yong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Clinical significance of No. 10 and 11 lymph nodes posterior to the splenic vessel in D2 radical total gastrectomy: An observational study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Wenjun Xiong; Zhiwei Liu; Lijie Luo; Yansheng Zheng; Ping Tan; Dechang Diao; Liaonan Zou; Jin Wan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.