Literature DB >> 24451863

Gingival margin changes in maxillary anterior sites after single immediate implant placement and provisionalization: a 5-year retrospective study of 47 patients.

Scott B Ross, Gregory A Pette, William B Parker, Patrick Hardigan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate gingival margin changes in the esthetic zone after immediate implant placement and provisionalization over 5 years with a custom anatomic provisional abutment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single maxillary incisor immediate implant placement and provisionalization procedures, completed and followed between February 2006 and August 2006, were analyzed retrospectively. During clinical recalls at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years, changes in gingival margins were recorded with clinical photographs and recorded in millimeters.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients each received a single implant (19 central incisors, 28 lateral incisors) and were followed for 5 years. Implants and restorations had a 100% survival rate during the study. The mean gingival margin changes (recession) were 0.17 mm at the time of definitive restoration, 0.27 mm at 3 months, 0.30 mm at 1 year, and 0.30 mm at 5 years. After 5 years, 24 of the 47 implant crowns had no significant gingival recession. All central incisor sites received 4.3-mm-diameter implants and had a mean change in tooth length of 0.03 mm at 5 years. Lateral incisor sites (n=28) received either a 3.5-mm-diameter implant (n=20) or a 4.3-mm-diameter implant (n=8). Lateral sites with the 3.5-mm implant had a mean change in gingival margin height of 0.08 mm of tooth length at 5 years; lateral sites with a 4.3-mm platform displayed a mean change of 0.82 mm of tooth length.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that implant diameter, gingival biotype, surgical technique, and/or the reason for tooth loss can influence the amount of gingival recession occurring over 5 years. Most recession occurred within the first 3 months, between implant placement/provisionalization and definitive restoration. The use of a customized anatomic provisional abutment can reduce the amount and frequency of recession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24451863     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  4 in total

1.  Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Andreas Künzlberger; Nikolaos Donos; Stefan Fickl; Anton Friedmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Aesthetics outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla: A case series study.

Authors:  Amin Saedi Germi; Vadoud Ghasemi Barghi; Karim Jafari; Rahman Nemati; Saeed Yeganzad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

3.  Facial mucosal level of single immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration: An intermediate-term study.

Authors:  Ali Bushahri; Oliver D Kripfgans; Furat George; I-Ching Wang; Hom-Lay Wang; Hsun-Liang Chan
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  CBCT analysis of the tissue thickness at immediate implant placement with contour augmentation in the maxillary anterior zone: a 1-year prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Yuya Fujita; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Takuya Shimomoto; Keiichiro Mizuno; Hirofumi Yatani; Shoichi Ishigaki
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.