Literature DB >> 24451474

The magnetic resonance imaging-based approach for identification of high-risk patients with upper rectal cancer.

Jee Suk Chang1, Youngin Lee, Joon Seok Lim, Nam Kyu Kim, Seung Hyuk Baik, Byung So Min, Hyuk Huh, Woong Sub Koom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying upper rectal cancer patients who are at high risk for local recurrence.
METHODS: 110 upper rectal cancer patients with locally advanced (pT3-4N0 or pTanyN+) tumors treated with tumor-specific mesorectal excision and no adjuvant radiotherapy were identified from an institutional database at a large academic medical center in Korea. Information on the extent of mesorectal invasion, sacral-side involvement was collected from preoperative MRI.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 47 months, 5 patients (4.5%) experienced local recurrence (LR). LR rates for patients with intermediate risk (T1-2/N1, T3N0), moderately high risk (T1-2/N2, T3N1, T4N0), and high risk (T3N2, T4/N1-2) were 3%, 4.8%, and 8.7%, respectively. Patients who did not have sacral-side involvement or mesorectal invasion of 5 mm or less did not experience LR. The patients with sacral-side involvement and intermediate risk, moderately high risk, and high risk had an LR rate of 4.2%, 5.6%, and 10%, respectively, or 11.1%, 33.3%, and 18.2%, respectively, when combined with those with mesorectal invasion of greater than 5 mm. Multivariate analyses demonstrated the presence of both sacral-side location and mesorectal invasion of greater than 5 mm was significantly associated with adverse disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mesorectal invasion of greater than 5 mm and sacral-side involvement identified on MRI were at an increased risk of local recurrence. The detection of these features on MRI provides prognostic information that is not available in conventional risk classification systems. Improved identification of a high-risk subset of upper rectal cancer patients may guide indications for preoperative chemoradiotherapy in this subset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24451474     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant Strategies: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shahab Ahmed; Cathy Eng
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Facility Variation in Local Staging of Rectal Adenocarcinoma and its Contribution to Underutilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Benjamin S Brooke; David E Skarda; Gregory J Stoddard; H Tae Kim; William T Sause; Courtney L Scaife
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Mapping of lateral pelvic lymph node recurrences in rectal cancer: a radiation oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jee Suk Chang; Hong In Yoon; Dong-Su Jang; Nam Kyu Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Byung So Min; Hyuk Huh; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Surgeon-Level Variation in Utilization of Local Staging and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Stage II-III Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; David E Skarda; William T Sause; Ute Gawlick; George M Cannon; Mark A Lewis; Courtney L Scaife; Jesse A Gygi; H Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Circumferential resection margin positivity after preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal cancer: implication of boost radiotherapy to the involved mesorectal fascia.

Authors:  Kyung Hwan Kim; Min Jung Park; Joon Seok Lim; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min; Joong Bae Ahn; Tae Il Kim; Ho Geun Kim; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reduced pelvic field sparing anastomosis for postoperative radiotherapy in selected patients with mid-upper rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jee Suk Chang; Nam Kyu Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Byung So Min; Hyuk Hur; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Yong Bae Kim; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 7.  Essential Items for Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendation from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Role of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Clinical Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Jii Bum Lee; Han Sang Kim; Ahrong Ham; Jee Suk Chang; Sang Jun Shin; Seung-Hoon Beom; Woong Sub Koom; Taeil Kim; Yoon Dae Han; Dai Hoon Han; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Yu Rang Park; Joon Seok Lim; Joong Bae Ahn
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Impact of a multidisciplinary training programme on outcome of upper rectal cancer by critical appraisal of the extent of mesorectal excision with postoperative MRI.

Authors:  P Bondeven; S Laurberg; R H Hagemann-Madsen; B G Pedersen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-12-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.