Literature DB >> 24451111

Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kate E Webster1, Julian A Feller, Warren B Leigh, Anneka K Richmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graft rupture of the same knee or injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the contralateral knee is a devastating outcome after ACL reconstruction surgery. While a number of factors have been identified as potentially increasing the risk of subsequent ACL injury, the literature is far from definitive.
PURPOSE: To determine the rates of graft rupture and contralateral ACL injury in a large cohort and to investigate patient characteristics that may be associated with these. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 750 patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction surgery with a minimum 3-year follow-up were questioned about the incidence of ACL graft rupture, contralateral ACL injury, family history of ACL injury, and current activity level. Patient databases provided details for age, sex, original injury mechanism, meniscus or articular surface injury, and graft diameter.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 561 patients (75%) at a mean ± SD follow-up time of 4.8 ± 1.1 years. Anterior cruciate ligament graft ruptures occurred in 25 patients (4.5%), and contralateral ACL injuries occurred in 42 patients (7.5%). The highest incidence of further ACL injury occurred in patients younger than 20 years at the time of surgery. In this group, 29% sustained a subsequent ACL injury to either knee. The odds for sustaining an ACL graft rupture or contralateral injury increased 6- and 3-fold, respectively, for patients younger than 20 years. Returning to cutting/pivoting sports increased the odds of graft rupture by a factor of 3.9 and contralateral rupture by a factor of 5. A positive family history doubled the odds for both graft rupture and contralateral ACL injury.
CONCLUSION: Patients younger than 20 years who undergo ACL reconstruction are at significantly increased risk for both graft rupture and contralateral ACL injury. Whether age per se is a risk factor or age represents a proxy for other factors remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; age; failure rate; graft survival; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24451111     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513517540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  136 in total

1.  Predictors for additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish national ACL register.

Authors:  Anne Fältström; Martin Hägglund; Henrik Magnusson; Magnus Forssblad; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Incidence and Predictors of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Primary Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  THE INFLUENCE OF HIP STRENGTH ON KNEE KINEMATICS DURING A SINGLE-LEGGED MEDIAL DROP LANDING AMONG COMPETITIVE COLLEGIATE BASKETBALL PLAYERS.

Authors:  Hidetomo Suzuki; Go Omori; Daisuke Uematsu; Katsutoshi Nishino; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10

4.  Younger Patients and Men Achieve Higher Outcome Scores Than Older Patients and Women After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Small hamstring autograft is defined by a cut-off diameter of 7 mm and not recommended with allograft augmentation in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Huijun Kang; Conglei Dong; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mathew J Failla; Amelia J H Arundale; David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 8.  Bridge-enhanced ACL repair: A review of the science and the pathway through FDA investigational device approval.

Authors:  Benedikt L Proffen; Gabriel S Perrone; Gordon Roberts; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Biomechanical Deficits at the Hip in Athletes With ACL Reconstruction Are Ameliorated With Neuromuscular Training.

Authors:  Christopher Nagelli; Samuel Wordeman; Stephanie Di Stasi; Joshua Hoffman; Tiffany Marulli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  A Novel Mass-Spring-Damper Model Analysis to Identify Landing Deficits in Athletes Returning to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Schneider; Alli Gokeler; Egbert Otten; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Jon G Divine; Angelo J Colosimo; Robert S Heidt; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.