Literature DB >> 24450671

Patient-tailored scan delay for multiphase liver CT: improved scan quality and lesion conspicuity with a novel timing bolus method.

J Gabriel Schneider1, Zhen J Wang, Wilbur Wang, Judy Yee, Yanjun Fu, Benjamin M Yeh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare scan quality and lesion conspicuity for late arterial and portal venous phase liver CT scans using fixed versus patient-tailored scan delay derived with an evidence-based timing bolus method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified the cases of 73 patients who underwent both multiphase liver CT with fixed late arterial and portal venous phase scan delay times of 45 and 80 seconds and subsequent multiphase liver CT with patient-tailored scan delay determined with a timing bolus and a previously reported relation between the time to peak aortic and liver enhancement. Both late arterial and portal venous phase scans were graded in terms of scan quality. Hepatic lesion conspicuity (difference in attenuation between lesion and liver parenchyma) for hypervascular lesions (late arterial phase) and hypovascular lesions (portal venous phase) was recorded.
RESULTS: Patient-tailored scan delay reflected a wide range of times to peak aortic enhancement (mean, 24 seconds; range, 18-32 seconds) and yielded a greater proportion of optimal scans compared with fixed scan delay for both late arterial phase (92% versus 74%, p < 0.01) and portal venous phase (86% versus 70%, p < 0.05) scans. Mean hypervascular lesion conspicuity was greater for lesions imaged with patient-tailored scan delay rather than fixed scan delay (84.0 versus 57.0 HU, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Compared with examinations with fixed scan delay, multiphase liver CT that incorporates patient-tailored scan delay produces more optimally timed late arterial and portal venous phase CT scans with greater lesion conspicuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24450671     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  We Built This House; It's Time to Move in: Leveraging Existing DICOM Structure to More Completely Utilize Readily Available Detailed Contrast Administration Information.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Hirsch; Eliot L Siegel; Sridhar Balasubramanian; Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Liver CT for vascular mapping during radioembolisation workup: comparison of an early and late arterial phase protocol.

Authors:  Andor F van den Hoven; Manon N G J A Braat; Jip F Prince; Pieter J van Doormaal; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Marnix G E H Lam; Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Computed Tomography Techniques, Protocols, Advancements, and Future Directions in Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Alice Fung; Avinash R Kambadakone; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.376

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.