BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n = 10, patient n = 409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n = 10, patient n = 469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. SETTING:Trauma centers in the United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). MEASUREMENTS: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). FINDINGS: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8% reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk = 0.88, 95%, confidence interval = 0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n = 10, patient n = 409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n = 10, patient n = 469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. SETTING:Trauma centers in the United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). MEASUREMENTS: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). FINDINGS: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8% reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk = 0.88, 95%, confidence interval = 0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION:Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.
Keywords:
Alcohol; American College of Surgeons; dissemination and implementation research; motivational interviewing; policy mandate; screening and brief intervention; traumatic brain injury
Authors: Douglas Zatzick; Dennis Donovan; Christopher Dunn; Joan Russo; Jin Wang; Gregory Jurkovich; Frederick Rivara; Lauren Whiteside; Richard Ries; Larry Gentilello Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2012-09-19
Authors: Larry M Gentilello; Beth E Ebel; Thomas M Wickizer; David S Salkever; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Steven L Bernstein; Maureen Walton; Kerry Broderick; Federico E Vaca; Robert Woolard; Edward Bernstein; Fred Blow; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michael R Polen; Carla A Green; Tracy Orleans; Jonathan Klein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian Borsari; Timothy R Apodaca; Kristina M Jackson; Anne Fernandez; Nadine R Mastroleo; Molly Magill; Nancy P Barnett; Kate B Carey Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2017-11-27
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; Mary Jo Larson; John D Corrigan; Grant A Ritter; Constance M Horgan; Robert M Bray; Thomas V Williams Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Joel Grossbard; Carol A Malte; Gwen Lapham; Kathleen Pagulayan; Aaron P Turner; Anna D Rubinsky; Katharine A Bradley; Andrew J Saxon; Eric J Hawkins Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Majid Afshar; Andrew Phillips; Niranjan Karnik; Jeanne Mueller; Daniel To; Richard Gonzalez; Ron Price; Richard Cooper; Cara Joyce; Dmitriy Dligach Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Douglas Zatzick; Kathleen Moloney; Lawrence Palinkas; Peter Thomas; Kristina Anderson; Lauren Whiteside; Deepika Nehra; Eileen Bulger Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 2.983