Literature DB >> 24450604

Development of an equation for estimating appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Japanese older adults using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Daisuke Yoshida1, Hiroyuki Shimada, Hyuntae Park, Yuya Anan, Tadashi Ito, Atsushi Harada, Takao Suzuki.   

Abstract

AIM: Bioelectrical impedance analysis has been reported to have high reliability and accuracy in assessing body composition. However, equations for estimating appendicular skeletal muscle mass are population-specific, and few have been developed for older Japanese adults. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to develop and validate an estimate equation for appendicular skeletal muscle mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis.
METHODS: A total of 250 older adults aged 65 years and older participated in this study. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bioelectrical resistance was measured using a multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer. Multiple regression analysis was applied to derive sex-specific estimation formulae using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and a Bland-Altman analysis was used to test agreement.
RESULTS: The cross-validation results showed that the slopes and intercepts of the regression lines were approximately one and zero, respectively, and the coefficients of determination and standard errors of the estimate of the newly developed equations were similar between the two groups. Thus, the single sex-specific equations were developed using all participants as follows. Men: appendicular skeletal muscle mass=0.197 × (impedance index) +0.179 × (weight) -0.019 (R(2)  =0.87, standard error of the estimate=0.98 kg). Women: appendicular skeletal muscle mass=0.221 × (impedance index) +0.117 × (weight) +0.881 (R(2)  =0.89, standard error of the estimate=0.81 kg).
CONCLUSION: These new equations offer a valid option for assessing appendicular skeletal muscle mass in older Japanese adults.
© 2014 Japan Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; bioelectrical impedance; body composition; sarcopenia; skeletal muscle mass

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24450604     DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int        ISSN: 1447-0594            Impact factor:   2.730


  20 in total

1.  The association of back muscle strength and sarcopenia-related parameters in the patients with spinal disorders.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Toyoda; Masatoshi Hoshino; Shoichiro Ohyama; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Kentaro Yamada; Shinji Takahashi; Kazunori Hayashi; Koji Tamai; Yusuke Hori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Total Psoas Area Index is Valuable to Assess Sarcopenia, Sarcopenic Overweight/Obesity and Predict Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jing-Yong Xu; Chen Li; He Zhang; Yuan Liu; Jun-Min Wei
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  Imaging body composition in cancer patients: visceral obesity, sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity may impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Connie Yip; Charlotte Dinkel; Abhishek Mahajan; Musib Siddique; Gary J R Cook; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-06-13

4.  Skeletal muscle mass adjusted by height correlated better with muscular functions than that adjusted by body weight in defining sarcopenia.

Authors:  Der-Sheng Han; Ke-Vin Chang; Chia-Ming Li; Yu-Hong Lin; Tung-Wei Kao; Keh-Sung Tsai; Tyng-Grey Wang; Wei-Shiung Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Developing and Validating an Age-Independent Equation Using Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Estimation of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass and Establishing a Cutoff for Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Yosuke Yamada; Miyuki Nishizawa; Tomoka Uchiyama; Yasuhiro Kasahara; Mikio Shindo; Motohiko Miyachi; Shigeho Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Quantification of whole-body and segmental skeletal muscle mass using phase-sensitive 8-electrode medical bioelectrical impedance devices.

Authors:  A Bosy-Westphal; B Jensen; W Braun; M Pourhassan; D Gallagher; M J Müller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis for diagnosing sarcopenia and cachexia: what are we really estimating?

Authors:  Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 8.  Differences among skeletal muscle mass indices derived from height-, weight-, and body mass index-adjusted models in assessing sarcopenia.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Kim; Hak Chul Jang; Soo Lim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population.

Authors:  Solomon C Y Yu; Alice Powell; Kareeann S F Khow; Renuka Visvanathan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Developing a toolkit for the assessment and monitoring of musculoskeletal ageing.

Authors:  Graham J Kemp; Fraser Birrell; Peter D Clegg; Daniel J Cuthbertson; Giuseppe De Vito; Jaap H van Dieën; Silvia Del Din; Richard Eastell; Patrick Garnero; Katarzyna Goljanek-Whysall; Matthias Hackl; Richard Hodgson; Malcolm J Jackson; Sue Lord; Claudia Mazzà; Anne McArdle; Eugene V McCloskey; Marco Narici; Mandy J Peffers; Stefano Schiaffino; John C Mathers
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.