Literature DB >> 24450342

Evaluation of pain scores after single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized control trial in a rural Indian population.

Firoz R Borle1, Bhupendra K Mehra, Sheelchand Jain.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is considered to be less invasive and have less morbidity than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). However, there is a relative paucity of data regarding postoperative pain scores in rural Indian populations following SILC. Also, data pertaining to the applicability of SILC in rural Indian population are scant.
METHODS: In the present randomized control trial, pain scores after SILC and CLC were evaluated. Sixty patients with gallstone disease were randomly assigned to one of two groups with 30 patients each: the CLC group and the SILC group. Postoperative pain scores were recorded on the visual analog scale at 8 hours, 24 hours and 7 days after surgery.
RESULTS: The patients were comparable with respect to age, sex and BMI. Operative time was longer for the SILC group (47.73 ± 5.57 min vs 69.53 ± 8.96 min; P < 0.0001).The pain scores were similar in both groups at 8 hours (3.61 ± 0.41 vs 3.50 ± 0.51; P = 0.36) and 24 hours (3.30 ± 0.59 vs 3.20 ± 0.40; P = 0.44) postoperatively. On day 7, the SILC group had lower pain scores than the CLC group (2.56 ± 0.56 vs 1.16 ± 0.37; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: There was no distinct advantage to SILC with regard to immediate postoperative pain. Pain was significantly less (P < 0.01) in the SILC group on postoperative day 7.
© 2013 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain scores; SILC; rural

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24450342     DOI: 10.1111/ases.12071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg        ISSN: 1758-5902


  4 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with curved versus linear instruments assessed by systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Salvador Morales-Conde; George A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Higher cost of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to longer operating time. A study of opportunity cost based on meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Fuertes-Guirò; M Girabent-Farrés
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Moira Cruickshank; Rumana Newlands; Jane Blazeby; Irfan Ahmed; Mohamed Bekheit; Miriam Brazzelli; Bernard Croal; Karen Innes; Craig Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.