Literature DB >> 24449462

Best practices for incorporating non-aphasia-specific apps into therapy.

Gail Ramsberger1, Paula Messamer1.   

Abstract

Given the proliferation of tablets and smartphones, there is a rising desire to use these technologies and apps in clinical practice. This article offers best-practice guidelines for integrating apps into aphasia rehabilitation. In concert with evidence-based practice guidelines, it describes the steps for deciding which apps to consider and how to judge their appropriateness. We recommend a process for selecting apps that involves three stages. The first step is no different than that used in traditional treatment planning. It involves assessing the client's speech and language, selecting the focus of treatment, and identifying evidence-based approaches to addressing this focus. When technology is being considered, however, it is also necessary to assess sensory, motor, and cognitive requirements of the apps and hardware being considered, as well as the client's ability to operate this technology. Finally, the clinician must consider hardware and Internet demands of the app and whether these are accessible to the client. We illustrate the process through a description of three cases for which we used apps that were not specifically designed for aphasia to deliver evidence-based treatments. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449462     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1362992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Speech Lang        ISSN: 0734-0478            Impact factor:   1.761


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform.

Authors:  Carrie A Des Roches; Isabel Balachandran; Elsa M Ascenso; Yorghos Tripodis; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Relationship between Self-Administered Cues and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Individuals with Aphasia: Understanding Individual Responsiveness to a Technology-Based Rehabilitation Program.

Authors:  Carrie A Des Roches; Annette Mitko; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Technology-Based Rehabilitation to Improve Communication after Acquired Brain Injury.

Authors:  Carrie A Des Roches; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Study on Language Rehabilitation for Aphasia.

Authors:  Zeng-Zhi Yu; Shu-Jun Jiang; Zi-Shan Jia; Hong-Yu Xiao; Mei-Qi Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Development of an English-language version of a Japanese iPad application to facilitate collaborative goal setting in rehabilitation: a Delphi study and field test.

Authors:  William Levack; Kounosuke Tomori; Kayoko Takahashi; Aidan J Sherrington
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.