Literature DB >> 24449281

[Improvement of the processes around the radiology workplace : avoidance of time delays].

U Grupp1, M Maurer.   

Abstract

Radiologists have been confronted with multiple new challenges in recent years. While there has been a steady increase in the number of radiological examinations and imaging material per examination, examination protocols have become more complex and highly time-consuming whereas case-based remuneration is on the decline. The identification of inefficient components in examination processes and reporting is therefore essential. Where and why do time delays occur? How can they be avoided? The following article provides a brief overview and is designed to stimulate discussion.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449281     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2556-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  8 in total

1.  Critical pathways intervention to reduce length of hospital stay.

Authors:  S D Pearson; S F Kleefield; J R Soukop; E F Cook; T H Lee
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  [Methods of process management in radiology].

Authors:  U K M Teichgräber; C Gillessen; F Neumann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-12

3.  ServiceBlueprinting as a service management tool in radiology.

Authors:  Martin H Maurer; Bernd Hamm; Ulf Teichgräber
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Tomi Kauppinen; Mika P Koivikko; Juhani Ahovuo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Can academic radiology departments become more efficient and cost less?

Authors:  S E Seltzer; S Saini; R T Bramson; P Kelly; L Levine; B F Chiango; P Jordan; A Seth; J Elton; J Elrick; D Rosenthal; B L Holman; J H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Improving the efficiency and service of computed tomographic scanning.

Authors:  J T Rhea; J H Thrall; S Saini; J Sumner
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Workload of consultant radiologists in a large DGH and how it compares to international benchmarks.

Authors:  S H M Khan; W P Hedges
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  [Process-oriented cost calculation in interventional radiology. A case study].

Authors:  A H Mahnken; P Bruners; R W Günther; C Rasche
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.