Literature DB >> 24449003

Biomechanical effects of pedicle screw fixation on adjacent segments.

Thein Aung Kyaw1, Zhuo Wang, Toshihiko Sakakibara, Takamasa Yoshikawa, Tadashi Inaba, Yuichi Kasai.   

Abstract

Various biomechanical investigations have attempted to clarify the aetiology of adjacent segment disease (ASD). However, no biomechanical study has examined in detail the deformation behaviour of the adjacent segments when both pure torque and an angular displacement load are applied to the vertebrae along multiple segments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effects of pedicle screw fixation on adjacent segments. Ten cadaveric lumbar spines (L2-L5) of boars were used. Control and fusion models were prepared by disc damage and pedicle screw fixation of each specimen, and then, bending and rotation tests were performed using a six-axis material tester. In the biomechanical tests regulated by an angular displacement load, the range of motion (ROM) of the cranial and caudal adjacent segments in antero-posterior flexion and lateral bending was increased by about 20 % (p < 0.05), and the maximal torque in the fusion model was about threefold (p < 0.05) that in the control model. And in axial rotation, the ROM of cranial and caudal adjacent segments was increased by about 100 % (p < 0.001), and the maximal torque was about sixfold (p < 0.01) that in the control model. The ROM of adjacent segments was significantly increased after pedicle screw fixation as assessed by biomechanical tests regulated by an angular displacement load, but not in those regulated by torque. We present the results of biomechanical tests regulated by torque and angular displacement and show that the maximum torque of the fusion model was larger than that of the control model in the biomechanical test regulated by an angular displacement load, suggesting that mechanical stress on the segments adjacent to the fused segment is large. We think that ASD arises after spinal fusion surgery as a mechanism to compensate for the ROM lost due to excessive fusion by pedicle screw fixation, so that a large torque may be applied to adjacent segments within a physiologically possible range, and it might gradually lead to a degenerative intervertebral disc or progression of spondylolisthesis in the adjacent segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449003     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1416-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  17 in total

1.  Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space.

Authors:  Takashi Kaito; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Takahiro Makino; Takeshi Fuji; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-06

2.  Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system.

Authors:  Yuichi Kasai; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Yoshihiro Matsumura; Koji Akeda; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments.

Authors:  D H Chow; K D Luk; J H Evans; J C Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions.

Authors:  J D Schlegel; J A Smith; R L Schleusener
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  C K Lee; N A Langrana
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion.

Authors:  P Axelsson; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation.

Authors:  Daniel Gelb; Steven Ludwig; Jacqueline E Karp; Edward H Chung; Clément Werner; Terrence Kim; Kornelis Poelstra
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Ali Kiapour; Scott A Yerby; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

Review 2.  Full-field in vitro investigation of hard and soft tissue strain in the spine by means of Digital Image Correlation.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Ruspi; Marco Palanca; Cesare Faldini; Luca Cristofolini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Adjacent level disease following lumbar spine surgery: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary?

Authors:  Ziyang Liang; Jianchao Cui; Jiarui Zhang; Jiahui He; Jingjing Tang; Hui Ren; Linqiang Ye; Xiaobing Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.