| Literature DB >> 24448675 |
Cory S Harris1, Alain Cuerrier, Erin Lamont, Pierre S Haddad, John T Arnason, Steffany A L Bennett, Timothy Johns.
Abstract
Evidence supports the health promoting benefits of berries, particularly with regard to the prevention and management of chronic diseases such cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Two related pathophysiological features common to many of these conditions are oxidative stress and the accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). Whereas antioxidant properties are well-established in several species of berries and are believed central to their protective mechanisms, few studies have investigated the effects of berries on AGE formation. Here, employing a series of complementary in vitro assays, we evaluated a collection of wild berry extracts for 1) inhibitory effects on fluorescent-AGE and Nε- (carboxymethyl)lysine-albumin adduct formation, 2) radical scavenging activity and 3) total phenolic and anthocyanin content. All samples reduced AGE formation in a concentration-dependent manner that correlated positively with each extract's total phenolic content and, to a lesser degree, total anthocyanin content. Inhibition of AGE formation was similarly related to radical scavenging activities. Adding antiglycation activity to the list of established functional properties ascribed to berries and their phenolic metabolites, our data provide further insight into the active compounds and protective mechanisms through which berry consumption may aid in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases associated with AGE accumulation and toxicity. As widely available, safe and nutritious foods, berries represent a promising dietary intervention worthy of further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24448675 PMCID: PMC3930840 DOI: 10.1007/s11130-014-0403-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Foods Hum Nutr ISSN: 0921-9668 Impact factor: 3.921
List of sampled berry species with collection details and extraction data
| Species | Family | Common name | Source a | Colour | % water b | % yield c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ericaceae | Black bearberry | 1 | Dark purple | 79.5 | 35.6 |
|
| Cornaceae | Bunchberry | 2 | Red | 89 | 48.8 |
|
| Ericaceae | Crowberry | 2 | Dark purple | 86 | 42.1 |
|
| Pinaceae | Common juniper | 2 | Blue | 68 | 47.2 |
|
| Grossulariaceae | Swamp currant | 2 | Red | 78.5 | 64.8 |
|
| Grossulariaceae | Smooth currant | 2 | Red | 76 | 43.5 |
|
| Rosaceae | Cloudberry | 1 | Orange | 84 | 62.7 |
|
| Rosaceae | Showy mountain ash | 2 | Orange-red | 81 | 72.8 |
|
| Ericaceae | Lowbush blueberry | 3 | Blue | 85 | 74.1 |
|
| Ericaceae | Bog cranberry | 4 | Red | 77.5 | 44.0 |
|
| Ericaceae | Bog bilberry | 1 | Blue | 84.5 | 73.3 |
|
| Ericaceae | 2 | Blue | 85.5 | 76.0 | |
|
| Ericaceae | 2 | Dark purple | 87 | 78.1 | |
|
| Ericaceae | Lingonberry | 4 | Crimson | 85 | 79.2 |
aBerry samples were collected in August and September near: 1) Kuujuac, Québec, Canada; 2) Great Whale River, Québec, Canada; 3) La Vérendrye Wildlife Reserve, Québec, Canada; 4) Chibougamau, Québec, Canada
bPercent water of berry samples is expressed as [1 − (g dry wt/g fresh wt)] × 100%
cPercent yield is expressed as (g extract/g dry wt) × 100%
Fig. 1Inhibition of AGE formation by representative berry extracts and correlations with phenolic and anthocyanin content as well as radical scavenging activity. a Concentration-dependent inhibition of fluorescent AGE formation by various extracts (mean ± SEM, n = 3–4). Corresponding IC50 values are listed in Table 2. b Western blot using CML-specific antibodies on protein samples incubated with glucose/fructose, vehicle, and quercetin (positive control, 16 μM), or 50 μg of berry extract. BSA incubated without sugar was used as a negative control for the CML-BSA antibody. Each SDS-PAGE separation was performed in duplicate; the first was used for Western blotting (upper panels) and the second to control for protein loading (Coomassie Blue staining – lower panels). c-f Pearson’s correlation analyses of fluorescent AGE (fluor-AGE) and carboxymethyl lysine (CML) inhibition relative to total phenolic content (TPH, expressed as quercetin equivalents), total monomeric anthocyanin content (TMAC, expressed as cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC, expressed as Trolox equivalents), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity expressed as percent ascorbic acid equivalents (% AAE). [(c) fluor-AGE vs. TPH: p < 0.001; r 2 = 0.760; CML vs TPH: p = 0.001; r 2 = 0.594; (d) fluor-AGE vs. TMAC: p = 0.097; r 2 = 0.213; CML vs TMAC: p = 0.047; r 2 = 0.291; (e) fluor-AGE vs. Trolox eq: p < 0.001; r 2 = 0.928; CML vs Trolox eq: p = 0.002; r 2 = 0.578; (f) fluorAGE vs. %AAE: p < 0.008; r 2 = 0.452; CML vs %AAE: p = 0.059; r 2 = 0.266]
Antiglycation activities, total phenolic and total anthocyanin contents, and radical scavenging activities of berry extracts
| Treatment | AGE inhibition | Phenolic & anthocyanin content | Anti-oxidant activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent AGE - IC50 a | CML-BSA % inhibition b | TPH c (mg/g) | TMAC d (mg/g) | ORAC e Trolox eq. | DPPH f % AAE | |
| Quercetin | 6.1 ± 1.8 | 81.4 ± 5.6 | – | – | 91845 ± 9437 | 205 ± 13.3 |
| Ascorbic acid | No effect | – | – | – | 3669 ± 274 | 100 ± 4.7 |
|
| 35.6 ± 9.5 | 62.6 ± 82.0 | 71.9 ± 3.1 | 2.91 ± 0.20 | 1660 ± 136 | 75.4 ± 8.9 |
|
| 120.3 ± 6.9 | 54.6 ± 4.0 | 19.2 ± 4.2 | 1.93 ± 0.03 | 624 ± 38 | 19.4 ± 2.2 |
|
| 38.2 ± 2.5 | 76.7 ± 7.2 | 70.0 ± 5.7 | 23.27 ± 1.37 | 2247 ± 225 | 40.2 ± 6.9 |
|
| 27.4 ± 2.6 | 64.9 ± 4.4 | 99.2 ± 4.7 | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 3876 ± 142 | 48.6 ± 2.3 |
|
| 46.0 ± 4.2 | 59.4 ± 5.0 | 45.4 ± 6.5 | 1.17 ± 0.12 | 2182 ± 109 | 16.8 ± 2.5 |
|
| 208.6 ± 34.4 | 53.0 ± 4.4 | 34.2 ± 7.7 | 0.36 ± 0.15 | 510 ± 34 | 22.8 ± 5.7 |
|
| 4009 ± 1753 | 37.4 ± 14.8 | 13.2 ± 2.3 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 438 ± 57 | 19.4 ± 1.9 |
|
| 192.7 ± 37.1 | 52.6 ± 1.5 | 10.3 ± 1.7 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 657 ± 88 | 10.8 ± 1.7 |
|
| 177.8 ± 22.4 | 39.0 ± 3.7 | 12.4 ± 2.1 | 6.81 ± 0.50 | 732 ± 38 | 9.5 ± 1.6 |
|
| 60.2 ± 1.5 | 60.9 ± 4.1 | 19.8 ± 3.1 | 0.50 ± 0.13 | 1049 ± 260 | 7.7 ± 0.7 |
|
| 75.5 ± 14.7 | 53.6 ± 3.9 | 14.9 ± 1.9 | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 747 ± 29 | 8.0 ± 0.7 |
|
| 57.5 ± 14.6 | 61.5 ± 7.1 | 29.8 ± 5.1 | 8.55 ± 0.32 | 1075 ± 132 | 13.8 ± 2.2 |
|
| 57.8 ± 8.2 | 61.4 ± 4.4 | 26.3 ± 6.4 | 9.07 ± 0.35 | 1216 ± 112 | 15.3 ± 3.2 |
|
| 44.5 ± 12.4 | 62.1 ± 4.7 | 32.6 ± 2.2 | 9.84 ± 0.37 | 1725 ± 66 | 8.1 ± 0.8 |
aIC50 concentrations ± SEM calculated as the extract (μg/mL) or control (μM) concentration required to reduce fluorescent AGE formation by 50 % as determined by regression analysis (n = 3–4)
b% inhibition ± SEM of Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine-BSA (CML-BSA) adduct formation as determined by densitometry of Western blot analyses of purified protein following treatment with sugar, vehicle, 16 μM quercetin or 50 μg extract/mL (n = 4–5)
cTotal phenolic content (TPH) as determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method, expressed as mg quercetin equivalents/g extract ± SEM (n = 3–4)
dTotal monomeric anthocyanin content (TMAC) as determined by the acid differential method, expressed as mg cyaniding-3-glucoside equivalents/g extract ± SEM (n = 3–4)
eOxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) is expressed in μM Trolox equivalents ± SEM at a concentration of 1 mg/mL for extracts and 1 mM for quercetin and ascorbic acid (n = 4–5)
fPercent ascorbic acid equivalents (% AAE) as determined by the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay (n = 4–5)