| Literature DB >> 24448401 |
Arnab Datta1, Jingru Qian2, Ruifen Chong1, Raj N Kalaria3, Paul Francis4, Mitchell K P Lai5, Christopher P Chen6, Siu Kwan Sze7.
Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a leading cause of dementia in the elderly together with Alzheimer's disease with limited treatment options. Poor understanding of the pathophysiology underlying VaD is hindering the development of new therapies. Hence, to unravel its underlying molecular pathology, an iTRAQ-2D-LC-MS/MS strategy was used for quantitative analysis of pooled lysates from Brodmann area 21 of pathologically confirmed cases of VaD and matched non-neurological controls. A total of 144 differentially expressed proteins out of 2281 confidently identified proteins (false discovery rate=0.3%) were shortlisted for bioinformatics analysis. Western blot analysis of selected proteins using samples from individual patients (n=10 per group) showed statistically significant increases in the abundance of SOD1 and NCAM and reduced ATP5A in VaD. This suggested a state of hypometabolism and vascular insufficiency along with an inflammatory condition during VaD. Elevation of SOD1 and increasing trend for iron-storage proteins (FTL, FTH1) may be indicative of an oxidative imbalance that is accompanied by an aberrant iron metabolism. The synaptic proteins did not exhibit a generalized decrease in abundance (e.g. syntaxin) in the VaD subjects. This reported proteome offers a reference data set for future basic or translational studies on VaD. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is the first quantitative clinical proteomic study where iTRAQ-2D-LC-MS/MS strategy has been used to identify the differential proteome in the VaD cortex by comparing VaD and matched control subjects. We generate testable hypothesis about the involvement of various proteins in the vascular and parenchymal events during the evolution of VaD that finally leads to malfunction and demise of brain cells. This study also establishes quantitative proteomics as a complementary approach and viable alternative to existing neurochemical, electron microscopic and neuroimaging techniques that are traditionally being used to understand the molecular pathology of VaD. Our study could inspire fellow researchers to initiate similar retrospective studies targeting various ethnicities, age-groups or sub-types of VaD using brain samples available from brain banks across the world. Meta-analysis of these studies in the future may be able to shortlist candidate proteins or pathways for rationale exploration of therapeutic targets or biomarkers for VaD.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical proteomics; Mass spectrometry; Oxidative stress; Vascular dementia; Vascular dysfunction; iTRAQ
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24448401 PMCID: PMC4024194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.01.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteomics ISSN: 1874-3919 Impact factor: 4.044
Demographics and disease variables for groups of control and VaD patients.
| Demographics | Control | VaD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | 10 | 10 | |
| Age at death (mean yrs ± SD) | 80.3 ± 8.9 | 84.0 ± 8.5 | |
| Sex (male/female) | 2 M/8 F | 7 M/3 F | |
| Duration of illness (yrs) | na | 3.8 ± 3.5 | |
| Post-mortem interval (median ± IQR) | 24.5 ± 24.0 | 36.5 ± 41.0 | |
| Disease variables | |||
| Pre-death MMSE (median ± SD/N) | na | 14.3 ± 3.7(6) | |
| Braak staging (N) | 0–II | 5 | 9 |
| III–IV | 3 | 0 | |
| V–VI | 0 | 0 | |
| NA* | 2 | 1 | |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range. na, not applicable; *NA, Not available.
The groups were not significantly different in terms of Age (independent sample t-test, p-value > 0.05) or post-mortem interval (Mann–Whitney U test, p-value > 0.05).
Fig. 1Schematic representation of experimental design showing discovery and validation phase.
Fig. 2Percent variation in iTRAQ ratios (115/114) between the same protein found in various technical and experimental replicates following MS. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of the proteins (bars) having different % co-efficient of variation (%CV) that was plotted in the horizontal axis. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins (lines) where 100% equals to 1878 proteins. These proteins have confidently been identified in at least 3 out of 10 MS runs. Ninety eight percent of the proteins had less than 40% of %CV. Accordingly; the regulation cut-off was set at 1.4-fold.
Significantly regulated proteome of VaD selected from the complete list of confidently identified proteinsa.
| N | Unused | %Cov (95) | Gene symbol | Name | Peptides (95%) | VaD: Control (115:114) | EF† (115:114) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycolysis | |||||||
| 16 | 214.6 | 96.1 | ENO1 | Alpha-enolase | 517 | 1.74 | 1.15 |
| 18 | 212.7 | 99.7 | ALDOA | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A | 421 | 0.53 | 1.19 |
| 27 | 179.8 | 99.8 | PGK1 | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | 296 | 0.47 | 1.31 |
| 43 | 124.9 | 100.0 | ALDOC | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase C | 298 | 0.54 | 1.20 |
| 150 | 56.2 | 66.8 | LDHB | 74 | 0.60 | 1.16 | |
| 311 | 33.7 | 64.2 | LDHA | 30 | 0.52 | 1.29 | |
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex | |||||||
| 332 | 32.2 | 31.3 | PDHA1 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, somatic form, mitochondrial | 19 | 0.61 | 1.19 |
| 355 | 30.5 | 49.9 | PDHB | Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta, mitochondrial | 37 | 0.58 | 1.21 |
| 395 | 27.2 | 29.5 | DLAT | Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, mitochondrial | 20 | 0.34 | 1.57 |
| Tricarboxylic acid cycle | |||||||
| 51 | 113.1 | 68.1 | ACO2 | Aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial | 139 | 0.46 | 1.38 |
| 118 | 65.2 | 60.6 | IDH2 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP], mitochondrial | 39 | 0.35 | 1.45 |
| 222 | 42.8 | 63.9 | FH | Fumarate hydratase, mitochondrial | 40 | 0.44 | 1.50 |
| 253 | 39.1 | 56.6 | IDH3A | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 26 | 0.62 | 1.19 |
| 324 | 32.7 | 40.2 | SUCLG1 | Succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP/GDP-forming] subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 35 | 0.49 | 1.31 |
| 565 | 20.0 | 31.5 | SUCLA2 | Succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial | 12 | 0.51 | 1.26 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | |||||||
| 41 | 130.1 | 72.7 | ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 124 | 0.57 | 1.26 | |
| 42 | 129.9 | 80.5 | ATP5B | ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial | 191 | 0.52 | 1.20 |
| 168 | 51.9 | 77.8 | ATP5J | ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial | 64 | 1.75 | 1.19 |
| 178 | 49.9 | 40.4 | NDUFS1 | NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit, mitochondrial | 35 | 0.49 | 1.36 |
| 193 | 47.6 | 55.4 | DLD | Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, mitochondrial | 29 | 0.53 | 1.26 |
| 202 | 45.6 | 61.6 | Cytochrome b–c1 complex subunit 2, mitochondrial | 36 | 0.53 | 1.36 | |
| 274 | 37.7 | 78.9 | ATP5O | ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrial | 29 | 0.51 | 1.45 |
| 340 | 31.8 | 45.7 | Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron–sulfur subunit, mitochondrial | 22 | 0.72 | 1.13 | |
| 1232 | 6.2 | 19.4 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 | 4 | 1.06 | 1.21 | |
| 1260 | 6.1 | 28.0 | NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 8, mitochondrial | 4 | 0.95 | 1.15 | |
| 17 | 214.3 | 92.1 | ALB | Serum albumin | 235 | 2.03 | 1.29 |
| 30 | 161.4 | 100.0 | HBB | Hemoglobin subunit beta | 356 | 0.26 | 1.39 |
| 126 | 62.3 | 31.3 | L1CAM | Neural cell adhesion molecule L1 | 56 | 1.49 | 1.12 |
| 157 | 53.7 | 38.0 | Neural cell adhesion molecule 1 | 37 | 1.79 | 1.32 | |
| 256 | 38.7 | 31.8 | Intercellular adhesion molecule 5 | 31 | 1.75 | 1.21 | |
| 265 | 38.1 | 27.8 | FGA | Fibrinogen alpha chain | 25 | 2.23 | 1.53 |
| 326 | 32.5 | 57.8 | IGHA1 | Ig alpha-1 chain C region | 24 | 5.55 | 2.36 |
| 383 | 28.3 | 47.5 | IGHG2 | Ig gamma-2 chain C region | 20 | 4.02 | 1.84 |
| 419 | 26.0 | 96.6 | HBD | Hemoglobin subunit delta | 152 | 0.54 | 1.21 |
| 442 | 25.2 | 26.8 | IGSF8 | Immunoglobulin superfamily member 8 | 15 | 2.13 | 1.46 |
| 461 | 24.2 | 47.9 | FGB | Fibrinogen beta chain | 15 | 1.94 | 1.46 |
| 609 | 18.4 | 74.5 | IGLC2 | Ig lambda-2 chain C regions | 13 | 3.77 | 1.96 |
| 734 | 14.5 | 90.6 | IGKC | Ig kappa chain C region | 20 | 4.41 | 2.17 |
| 1256 | 6.1 | 3.0 | COL6A3 | Collagen alpha-3(VI) chain | 8 | 1.79 | 1.29 |
| 9 | 266.6 | 99.8 | ENO2 | Gamma-enolase | 586 | 1.58 | 1.14 |
| 26 | 181.9 | 98.4 | PEBP1 | Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 | 342 | 1.57 | 1.17 |
| 119 | 65.0 | 39.9 | ATP1A3 | Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-3 | 45 | 2.96 | 1.53 |
| 121 | 63.7 | 80.1 | RPS27A | Ubiquitin-40S ribosomal protein S27a | 55 | 3.87 | 1.74 |
| 133 | 60.1 | 43.8 | Synaptopodin | 46 | 0.73 | 1.10 | |
| 141 | 58.2 | 52.8 | PPP3CA | Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoform | 52 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| 218 | 43.3 | 49.2 | ABAT | 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial | 26 | 0.59 | 1.21 |
| 244 | 40.1 | 40.5 | ALDH9A1 | 4-Trimethylaminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase | 29 | 0.56 | 1.26 |
| 345 | 31.6 | 65.0 | SNAP25 | Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 | 34 | 1.64 | 1.20 |
| 358 | 30.3 | 36.5 | Syntaxin-1B | 23 | 1.89 | 1.29 | |
| 463 | 24.1 | 14.3 | SLC1A2 | Excitatory amino acid transporter 2 | 22 | 2.63 | 1.51 |
| 667 | 16.5 | 29.5 | Syntaxin-1A | 9 | 1.85 | 1.26 | |
| 783 | 13.3 | 26.0 | ATP1A2 | Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-2 | 32 | 2.21 | 1.60 |
| 63 | 99.0 | 99.3 | Superoxide dismutase [Cu–Zn] | 188 | 3.02 | 1.72 | |
| 134 | 59.8 | 82.5 | Ferritin heavy chain | 135 | 2.05 | 1.41 | |
| 152 | 55.4 | 63.4 | Ferritin light chain | 80 | 2.21 | 1.41 | |
| 208 | 44.5 | 85.7 | PRDX6 | Peroxiredoxin-6 | 48 | 0.41 | 1.45 |
| 279 | 37.2 | 84.7 | GPX1 | Glutathione peroxidase 1 | 30 | 1.18 | 1.13 |
| 898 | 11.0 | 14.2 | GSR | Glutathione reductase, mitochondrial | 8 | 0.63 | 1.26 |
| 70 | 90.8 | 60.9 | HSPA5 | 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein | 94 | 1.42 | 1.12 |
| 72 | 88.6 | 61.1 | HSP90AA1 | Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha | 79 | 0.43 | 1.45 |
| 92 | 76.2 | 67.2 | STIP1 | Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 | 61 | 1.45 | 1.15 |
| 132 | 60.2 | 53.5 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 | 40 | 0.46 | 1.42 | |
| 255 | 38.7 | 96.1 | HSPB1 | Heat shock protein beta-1 | 63 | 1.77 | 1.17 |
| 330 | 32.3 | 44.0 | CCT8 | T-complex protein 1 subunit theta | 19 | 1.80 | 1.29 |
| 656 | 17.0 | 80.6 | TBCA | Tubulin-specific chaperone A | 16 | 1.57 | 1.20 |
| 71 | 90.6 | 37.6 | NFASC | Neurofascin | 72 | 1.75 | 1.26 |
| 73 | 87.9 | 96.1 | Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 | 91 | 0.56 | 1.17 | |
| 84 | 80.6 | 100 | SNCG | Gamma-synuclein | 91 | 1.08 | 1.04 |
| 200 | 46.0 | 33.4 | NPEPPS | Puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase | 27 | 0.42 | 1.47 |
| 203 | 45.4 | 97.7 | Astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA-15 | 42 | 1.56 | 1.15 | |
| 651 | 17.2 | 15.1 | PREP | Prolyl endopeptidase | 10 | 0.58 | 1.20 |
| 799 | 12.8 | 37.4 | PSMA6 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-6 | 8 | 0.64 | 1.26 |
The gene symbols of the proteins selected for WB validation are shown in bold. The proteins have been classified based on their respective primary function/pathway. The energy metabolism category is sub-divided into four groups. Majority of the proteins related to energy metabolism were down-regulated, while proteins related to inflammation (immune response and cell adhesion) were up-regulated. Proteins participating in synaptic transmission and chaperonic function displayed a mixed trend.
The list of proteins qualified through the preset selection criteria (unused prot score > 2.0, p < 0.05, regulation cut-off : 1.4 fold compared to the control group) along with their relative quantitative values. The gene symbols of the proteins selected for WB validation are shown in bold. The proteins have been classified based on their respective primary function/pathway. The energy metabolism category is sub-divided into four groups. Majority of the proteins related to energy metabolism were down-regulated, while proteins related to inflammation (immune response and cell adhesion) were up-regulated. Proteins participating in synaptic transmission and chaperonic function displayed a mixed trend.
Proteins incorporated in the list due to their close association with the regulated proteins although they did not meet the above-mentioned preset selection criteria. For example, the fold of down-regulation was < 1.4 fold for SYNPO, while others (e.g. SDHB, SNCG) doesn't have a significant p-value (i.e. p > 0.05).
Fig. 3Post-proteomic validation of the selected proteins using individual patients from control and VaD groups by WB analysis. Equal amount of protein was loaded as measured by the 2D Quant kit. A) Representative immunoblots showing the protein levels in B21 area of all twenty patients (n = 10 per group). Details of the patients can be found in the Supplemental Table 1. ACTB was used as a loading control. B) Bar chart of densitometric analysis for comparing the protein expression levels by the statistical analysis. SOD1 and NCAM were significantly increased whereas ATP5A was reduced significantly in the VaD brain. Trends were observed for SYNPO, HSPA4, VADC1, ferritin, PEA15 and ICAM5 without reaching a statistical significance. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10), where *p < 0.05, significantly different from control using independent-sample t-test.
Fig. 4Schematic diagram showing the interplay of various vascular and parenchymal events during the evolution of VaD. ↑, up-regulation; ↓, down-regulation.
Fig. 5Schematic diagram showing the probable involvement of SOD1 and ferritin (FTL, FTH1) in detoxifying the demented brain cells from iron overload and oxidative imbalance.
Fig. 6A. Representative immunoblots showing the levels of important markers of apoptosis in the temporal cortex of control and VaD patients. B. Bar chart of band densities (in arbitrary units) involving all twenty individuals and normalized with the expression of muscle actin, which was used as a loading control. There were no statistically significant difference in the abundance of BCL2 and pro-caspase 3 between control and VaD group. Data was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10), where *p < 0.05, significantly different from control using independent-sample t-test.