Literature DB >> 24447838

In-center hemodialysis attendance: patient perceptions of risks, barriers, and recommendations.

Kara B Chenitz1, Michael Fernando, Judy A Shea.   

Abstract

Missed hemodialysis treatments lead to increased morbidity and mortality in the end-stage renal disease population. Little is known about why patients have difficulty attending their scheduled in-center dialysis treatments. Semistructured interviews with 15 adherent and 15 nonadherent hemodialysis patients were conducted to determine patients' attitudes about dialysis, health beliefs and risk perception regarding missed treatments, barriers and facilitators to hemodialysis attendance, and recommendations to improve the system to facilitate dialysis attendance. Average time on dialysis was 2.5 years for the nonadherent group and 7.3 years in the adherent group. In both groups, patients felt that dialysis is life-saving and a necessity. A substantial number of patients in both groups understood that missing hemodialysis treatments is dangerous and several patients could clearly communicate the risk of skipping. The most common barriers to hemodialysis were inadequate or unreliable transportation (mentioned in both groups) and a lack of motivation to get to dialysis or that dialysis is not a priority (typically mentioned by the nonadherent group). Facilitators to hemodialysis attendance included explanations from the health care team regarding the risk of skipping and relationships with other dialysis patients. Patient recommendations to improve dialysis attendance included continued education about the risk of poor attendance and more accessible transportation. Patients did not feel that home dialysis would improve adherence. Hemodialysis patients must adhere to a complex and burdensome regimen. Through the elucidation of barriers and facilitators to hemodialysis attendance and through specific patient recommendations, at least three interventions may be further investigated to improve hemodialysis attendance: Improvement of the transportation system, education and supportive encouragement from the health care team, and peer support mentorship.
© 2014 International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; attendance; hemodialysis; nonadherence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447838     DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  14 in total

1.  Adherence barriers to chronic dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin E Chan; Ravi I Thadhani; Franklin W Maddux
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Delivering direct patient care in the haemodialysis unit: a focused ethnographic study of care delivery.

Authors:  Alison F Wood; Jennifer Tocher; Sheila Rodgers
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-12-04

Review 3.  Applying A Biopsychosocial Framework to Achieve Durable Behavior Change in Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Devika Nair; Daniel Cukor; Warren D Taylor; Kerri L Cavanaugh
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  Applying a Geriatrics Framework to Older Dialysis Patients' Needs: Getting There Is Half the Battle.

Authors:  O Alison Potok; Dena E Rifkin
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2020-09-01

5.  Explore Transplant at Home: a randomized control trial of an educational intervention to increase transplant knowledge for Black and White socioeconomically disadvantaged dialysis patients.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; Anna-Michelle M McSorley; John D Peipert; Christina J Goalby; Leanne J Peace; Patricia A Lutz; Jessica L Thein
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  The perspectives of Aboriginal patients and their health care providers on improving the quality of hemodialysis services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Rix; Lesley Barclay; Janelle Stirling; Allison Tong; Shawn Wilson
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 1.812

7.  Barriers to and facilitators of care for hemodialysis patients; a qualitative study.

Authors:  Monir Nobahar; Mohammad Reza Tamadon
Journal:  J Renal Inj Prev       Date:  2016-02-28

8.  Does Rescheduling a Missed In-Center Hemodialysis Treatment Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Authors:  Nasim Wiegley; Andrew I Chin
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2020-02-01

9.  Work of being an adult patient with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Javier Roberti; Amanda Cummings; Michelle Myall; Jonathan Harvey; Kate Lippiett; Katherine Hunt; Federico Cicora; Juan Pedro Alonso; Carl R May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient reactions to witnessed medical events in the dialysis center or to the sudden absence of other patients from the center: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah J Ramer; M Carrington Reid; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 1.812

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.