Stanley Berent1, Bruno Giordani2, James W Albers3, David H Garabrant4, Sarah S Cohen5, Richard P Garrison4, Rudy J Richardson3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: sberent@umich.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, USA. 5. EpidStat Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphorus (OP) anticholinesterase insecticide, occurs typically in settings where multiple agents are present (e.g., agriculture) and quantitative dose measures may be absent (e.g., pesticide application). Such exposures allow few opportunities to study potential neurobehavioral effects of CPF alone. We studied the relationship between CPF exposure and behavioral function among CPF manufacturing workers, which allowed identification, measurement, and estimation of exposure and important non-exposure variables that potentially could affect study findings. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study design was used to compare neurobehavioral function over a one-year period among 53 CPF workers and 60 referent workers. Quantitative and qualitative measures were used, and potential confounders were identified and tested for possible inclusion in our statistical models. Neurobehavioral function was assessed by neuropsychological tests covering various behavioral domains that may be adversely affected by exposure to CPF in sufficient amount. RESULTS: CPF workers had significantly greater CPF exposures during the study period than did referents at levels where physiologic effects on plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) activity were apparent and with higher 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy/Cr) urinary excretion (p<0.0001) and lower average BuChE activity (p<0.01). No evidence for impaired neurobehavioral domains by either group of workers was observed at baseline, on repeat examination, or between examinations. CPF workers scored higher than referent workers on the verbal memory domain score (p=0.03) at baseline, but there were no significant changes in verbal memory over time and no significant group-by-time interactions. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides important information about CPF exposure in the workplace by not supporting our working hypothesis that CPF exposure associated with various aspects of the manufacturing process would be accompanied by adverse neurobehavioral effects detectable by quantitative neurobehavioral testing. Some aspects making this workplace site attractive for study and also present limitations for the generalization of results to other situations that might have exposures that vary widely between and within different facilities and locations. For example, these results might not apply to occupations such as applicators with higher exposure or to workers with low educational levels.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphorus (OP) anticholinesterase insecticide, occurs typically in settings where multiple agents are present (e.g., agriculture) and quantitative dose measures may be absent (e.g., pesticide application). Such exposures allow few opportunities to study potential neurobehavioral effects of CPF alone. We studied the relationship between CPF exposure and behavioral function among CPF manufacturing workers, which allowed identification, measurement, and estimation of exposure and important non-exposure variables that potentially could affect study findings. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study design was used to compare neurobehavioral function over a one-year period among 53 CPF workers and 60 referent workers. Quantitative and qualitative measures were used, and potential confounders were identified and tested for possible inclusion in our statistical models. Neurobehavioral function was assessed by neuropsychological tests covering various behavioral domains that may be adversely affected by exposure to CPF in sufficient amount. RESULTS:CPF workers had significantly greater CPF exposures during the study period than did referents at levels where physiologic effects on plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) activity were apparent and with higher 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy/Cr) urinary excretion (p<0.0001) and lower average BuChE activity (p<0.01). No evidence for impaired neurobehavioral domains by either group of workers was observed at baseline, on repeat examination, or between examinations. CPF workers scored higher than referent workers on the verbal memory domain score (p=0.03) at baseline, but there were no significant changes in verbal memory over time and no significant group-by-time interactions. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides important information about CPF exposure in the workplace by not supporting our working hypothesis that CPF exposure associated with various aspects of the manufacturing process would be accompanied by adverse neurobehavioral effects detectable by quantitative neurobehavioral testing. Some aspects making this workplace site attractive for study and also present limitations for the generalization of results to other situations that might have exposures that vary widely between and within different facilities and locations. For example, these results might not apply to occupations such as applicators with higher exposure or to workers with low educational levels.
Authors: Paul J Laurienti; Jonathan H Burdette; Jennifer Talton; Carey N Pope; Phillip Summers; Francis O Walker; Sara A Quandt; Robert G Lyday; Haiying Chen; Timothy D Howard; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Boris Andrés Lucero; Verónica Paz Iglesias; María Pía Muñoz; Claudia Alejandra Cornejo; Eduardo Achu; Brittney Baumert; Arianna Hanchey; Carlos Concha; Ana María Brito; Marcos Villalobos Journal: Int J Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-04-29
Authors: Ha T Nguyen; Sara A Quandt; Phillip Summers; Timothy M Morgan; Haiying Chen; Francis O Walker; Timothy D Howard; Leonardo Galván; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ahmed A Ismail; Kai Wang; James R Olson; Matthew R Bonner; Olfat Hendy; Gaafar Abdel Rasoul; Diane S Rohlman Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2017-09-07