Literature DB >> 24447825

Stage, grade and pathological characteristics of bladder cancer in the UK: British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) urological tumour registry.

Gregory B Boustead1, Sarah Fowler, Rajiv Swamy, Roger Kocklebergh, Luke Hounsome.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and demographics at presentation in a very large, contemporary UK cohort of patients with bladder cancer and compare them with other published series, as little published data exists on the pathological characteristics of bladder cancer at presentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Section of Oncology started a new urological tumour registry in 1998. We performed a data analysis of all bladder cancer cases between 1999 and 2008. Tumour TNM stage, grade and histopathological diagnosis were reviewed along with standard epidemiological data.
RESULTS: In all, 69,712 bladder cancer registrations were recorded. Complete T, N and M stage and grade was available for 32,240 patients. The male to female ratio of the study population was 3:1 and the overall median (sd, range) age at presentation was 73 (11.6, 6-108) years. Final pathological T staging showed that non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer accounted for 75% of cases with the remaining 25% being muscle-invasive disease. Of these patients, 8% had nodal disease and 4% other metastatic sites at presentation. The tumour grade was G1-2 in 65% and G3 in 35% of cases. Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) accounted for 92%, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinomas 1.5% each, with 5% other histological variants.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-muscle-invasive TCC accounted for 75% of bladder cancer cases in the UK. The 1973 World Health Organization classification remains in widespread use amongst pathologists in the UK. Obtaining complete and standardised staging and pathology reporting systems in bladder cancer remains a challenge.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grade; Stage; TNM classification; bladder cancer; classification of bladder cancer; histopathology; muscle-invasive bladder cancer; non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447825     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative genome-wide methylation analysis of high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mark O Kitchen; Richard T Bryan; Richard D Emes; John R Glossop; Christopher Luscombe; K K Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Nicholas D James; Adam J Devall; Charles A Mein; Lyndon Gommersall; Anthony A Fryer; William E Farrell
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Canada: A survey of genitourinary medical oncologists and urologists.

Authors:  Tina Hsu; Peter C Black; Kim N Chi; Christina M Canil; Bernhard J Eigl; Girish Kulkarni; Scott North; Lori Wood; Alexandre R Zlotta; Anthea Lau; Tony Panzarella; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prognostic values of distal ureter involvement and survival outcomes in bladder cancer at T1 and T2 stages: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Song Xiao; Xiangpeng Zhan; Tao Chen; Jingxin Wu; Linhao Xu; Ming Jiang; Wen Deng; Ke Zhu; Zhenhao Zeng; Xiaofeng Cheng; Qiang Zhou; Wei Huang; Xiaochen Zhou; Cheng Zhang; Bin Fu; Gongxian Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Prognostic Model for Urologic Cancers: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Eugene Shkolyar; Bernhard Breil; Axel Semjonow; Martin Boegemann; Lei Xing; Ilker Tinay; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Proteomic analysis reveals key differences between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas across multiple tissues.

Authors:  Qi Song; Ye Yang; Dongxian Jiang; Zhaoyu Qin; Chen Xu; Haixing Wang; Jie Huang; Lingli Chen; Rongkui Luo; Xiaolei Zhang; Yufeng Huang; Lei Xu; Zixiang Yu; Subei Tan; Minying Deng; Ruqun Xue; Jingbo Qie; Kai Li; Yanan Yin; Xuetong Yue; Xiaogang Sun; Jieakesu Su; Fuchu He; Chen Ding; Yingyong Hou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Investigation of urinary volatile organic compounds as novel diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lauren Lett; Michael George; Rachael Slater; Ben De Lacy Costello; Norman Ratcliffe; Marta García-Fiñana; Henry Lazarowicz; Chris Probert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 7.  Cell adhesion and urothelial bladder cancer: the role of cadherin switching and related phenomena.

Authors:  Richard T Bryan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Methylation of HOXA9 and ISL1 Predicts Patient Outcome in High-Grade Non-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Mark O Kitchen; Richard T Bryan; Kim E Haworth; Richard D Emes; Christopher Luscombe; Lyndon Gommersall; K K Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Nicholas D James; Adam J Devall; Anthony A Fryer; William E Farrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jamie J D'Costa; James C Goldsmith; Jayne S Wilson; Richard T Bryan; Douglas G Ward
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27

10.  HumanMethylation450K Array-Identified Biomarkers Predict Tumour Recurrence/Progression at Initial Diagnosis of High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Mark O Kitchen; Richard T Bryan; Richard D Emes; Christopher J Luscombe; K K Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Nicholas D James; Lyndon M Gommersall; Anthony A Fryer
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2018-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.