Literature DB >> 24447517

Renal function evaluation in patients undergoing orthotopic bladder substitution: a systematic review of literature.

Ahmed M Harraz1, Ahmed Mosbah, Ahmed El-Assmy, Hosam Gad, Atallah A Shaaban.   

Abstract

Renal function (RFn) after orthotopic bladder substitution (OBS) is a critical point to be assessed. We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE for full length peer reviewed English articles from the year 2000 till January 2013. We included only original articles and excluded reviews, editorials and replies and abstracts presented in conferences. The outcome is formulated in research questions; what is the status of RFn after OBS? Which is better, the direct free-refluxing or anti-refluxing ureteroileal anastomosis (UIA) techniques? Studies reporting RFn as secondary outcome were also reported. A total of 129 publications were reviewed for full text and only 41 were included in this review. All studies were of low level of evidence and grade of recommendations. Only 3 randomized controlled trials were included and were of poor quality. Renal function after OBS was poorly described in the literature with no universal definition about RFn deterioration or outcome with no consensus on the best evaluation method. Urinary obstruction, chemotherapy and pyelonephritis appeared significant factors but with insufficient evidence. There is a universal trend to use the free refluxing technique for UIA to avoid complications of anti-refluxing techniques. However, the anti-reflux technique proved acceptable outcome in experienced hands. There is marked heterogeneity and underestimation of RFn evaluation among reported outcomes after OBS with most publications reporting the incidence of UIA and pyelonephritis with paucity reporting absolute figures about RFn measurements. In conclusion, urinary tract obstruction remains the main factor of RFn deterioration after OBS. Methods evaluating RFn, definitions of RFn outcome and factors predicting it are poorly studied in the literature and the current evidence is relatively weak to draw solid conclusions. Further well-designed studies and consensus about method of assessment and definitions of RFn are warranted.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  orthotopic bladder substitution; radical cystectomy; renal function; urinary diversion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447517     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Biphasic decline in renal function after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Makino; Tohru Nakagawa; Atsushi Kanatani; Taketo Kawai; Satoru Taguchi; Masafumi Otsuka; Akihiko Matsumoto; Hideyo Miyazaki; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion: perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Qi Gu; Jiadong Xia; Aiming Xu; Tongtong Zhang; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

4.  Acute kidney injury following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: predictors and associated morbidity.

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Ahmed M Harraz; Samer El-Halwagy; Mahmoud Laymon; Ahmed Mosbah; Hassan Abol-Enein; Atalla A Shaaban
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture.

Authors:  U Krafft; O Mahmoud; J Hess; J P Radtke; A Panic; L Püllen; C Darr; C Kesch; T Szarvas; C Rehme; B A Hadaschik; S Tschirdewahn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.