Literature DB >> 24447383

The reach, transferability, and impact of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: a methodological and narrative literature review.

Dominic Upton1, Penney Upton, Laura Scurlock-Evans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice (EBP) has been increasingly emphasized in nursing, but its implementation is still sometimes met with confusion and resistance. Therefore, identifying factors affecting its implementation is crucial. The Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ) was published in 2006, addressing a need for a robust measure of nurses' practice of, attitudes toward, and knowledge of EBP. The growing body of professionals using the questionnaire means that a review of its reach, transferability, and impact is timely. AIMS: The aims of this review were threefold: (a) identify the situations in which the EBPQ has been used in both published and unpublished research internationally (Reach); (b) collate the psychometric properties of the EBPQ from the research reviewed (Transferability); and (c) discuss the study's findings to shed new light on issues facing professionals in implementing EBP, and possible future directions for research (Impact).
METHODS: Literature searches on studies reported between 2006 and July 2012 inclusive were conducted using the terms "Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire" and "EBPQ." Green, Johnson and Adams's guidelines for completing narrative literature reviews and Terwee et al.'s framework for reporting questionnaires' psychometric properties were adopted to ensure rigor.
FINDINGS: Twenty-seven studies were reviewed in which the EBPQ had been translated into five different languages and used with a variety of professional groups. The questionnaire demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity and good internal reliability. Research adopting the questionnaire identified a range of variables related to EBP implementation, including qualification route and job role. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Assessment of organizational culture and workforce training needs prior to developing educational interventions is crucial. The EBPQ has the potential to provide further understanding of these and other issues faced by professionals when implementing EBP.
© 2014 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire; evidence-based practice; methodological and narrative literature review; nursing; psychometric analysis; staff development

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447383     DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  9 in total

1.  Attitudes Towards and Perceptions Regarding the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Among Omani Nurses.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Maskari; Barbara J Patterson
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2018-12-19

2.  Validation study of the Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire.

Authors:  Mariusz Panczyk; Jarosława Belowska; Aleksander Zarzeka; Łukasz Samoliński; Halina Żmuda-Trzebiatowska; Joanna Gotlib
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes of Polish Nurses As Compared With Evidence-Based Practice in Relation to the Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council.

Authors:  Dorota Ozga; Marzena Jędrzejczyk-Cwanek; Krystyna Woźniak; Edyta Niemczyk; Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2019-12-26

4.  Design and validity of an instrument to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions, behaviour, self-efficacy and attitudes towards evidence-based health practice: I-SABE.

Authors:  Arielly Souza Mariano Ruano; Fabiane Raquel Motter; Luciane Cruz Lopes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Attitude, Knowledge, and Practice on Evidence-Based Nursing among Registered Nurses in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals: A Multiple Center Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Authors:  Fen Zhou; Yufang Hao; Hong Guo; Hongxia Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Belita; Janet E Squires; Jennifer Yost; Rebecca Ganann; Trish Burnett; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2020-05-27

7.  Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire (HS-EBP): Normative Data and Differential Profiles in Spanish Osteopathic Professionals.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Fernández-Domínguez; Isabel Escobio-Prieto; Albert Sesé-Abad; Rafael Jiménez-López; Natalia Romero-Franco; Ángel Oliva-Pascual-Vaca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.

Authors:  María Ruzafa-Martínez; Serafín Fernández-Salazar; César Leal-Costa; Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Amédé Gogovor; Mamane Abdoulaye Samri; José Massougbodji; Luke Wolfenden; Jenny Ploeg; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew J Milat; Nathalie Rheault; Youssoufa M Ousseine; Jennifer Salerno; Maureen Markle-Reid; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.