Literature DB >> 24447114

Predictors of clinical effectiveness of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy.

F Ruëff1, B Vos, J Oude Elberink, A Bender, R Chatelain, S Dugas-Breit, H-P Horny, H Küchenhoff, A Linhardt, S Mastnik, K Sotlar, E Stretz, R Vollrath, B Przybilla, M Flaig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment failure during venom immunotherapy (VIT) may be associated with a variety of risk factors, of which the relative importance is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC), mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) and of other parameters with the frequency of objective systemic reactions during in-hospital sting challenge (SC).
METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, we enrolled 1532 patients (1609 cases due to double SC) with established honeybee or vespid venom allergy who had undergone VIT and a subsequent SC. Data were collected on various putative risk factors. Adult-onset MIS and/or a BTC > 20.0 μg/L was defined as clinical indicators of systemic mastocytosis. Relative rates were calculated with logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (6.4%) presented with MIS and/or BTC > 20.0 μg/L. 104 cases (6.5%) developed objective generalized symptoms during SC. In the absence of MIS, a BTC ≤ 20 μg/L did not increase the risk for VIT failure. The most important factors associated with a worse outcome were ACE inhibitor medication (OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.83-13.00, P < 0.001), honeybee venom allergy (OR 5.09, 95% CI 3.17-8.15, P < 0.001), systemic allergic reaction during VIT (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.79-5.14, P < 0.001), and a substantial likelihood to suffer from SM (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.37-5.22, P = 0.003), whereas a double VIT (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.90, P = 0.027) and a longer duration of therapy (OR 0.68 per treatment month, 95% CI 0.50-0.93, P = 0.017) reduced the failure rate.
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of therapeutic success correlates with type of venom, duration of therapy, and venom dose. Adult-onset MIS and/or a BTC > 20 μg/L is a significant, albeit not the strongest determinant for VIT failure. According to its odds ratio, ACE inhibitor therapy appears to be associated with the highest risk for VIT failure.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hymenoptera venom; allergy; mastocytosis in the skin; risk factors; sting challenge; tryptase; venom dose; venom immunotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447114     DOI: 10.1111/cea.12275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  21 in total

1.  Long-lasting complete response to imatinib in a patient with systemic mastocytosis exhibiting wild type KIT.

Authors:  Peter Valent; Sabine Cerny-Reiterer; Gregor Hoermann; Wolfgang R Sperr; Leonhard Müllauer; Christine Mannhalter; Hubert Pehamberger
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  [Sting challenge: indications and execution].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.

Authors:  Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 4.  Hymenoptera allergens: from venom to "venome".

Authors:  Edzard Spillner; Simon Blank; Thilo Jakob
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Safety and efficacy of venom immunotherapy: a real life study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kołaczek; Dawid Skorupa; Monika Antczak-Marczak; Piotr Kuna; Maciej Kupczyk
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Worldwide perspectives on venom allergy.

Authors:  Peter Korošec; Thilo Jakob; Harfi Harb; Robert Heddle; Sarah Karabus; Ricardo de Lima Zollner; Julij Selb; Bernard Yu-Hor Thong; Fares Zaitoun; David B K Golden; Michael Levin
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 7.  Clinical Utility of Rush Venom Immunotherapy: Current Status.

Authors:  Vianney Gruzelle; Claire Mailhol; David W Waters; Laurent Guilleminault
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2020-01-07

Review 8.  Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy: Immune Mechanisms of Induced Protection and Tolerance.

Authors:  Ajda Demšar Luzar; Peter Korošec; Mitja Košnik; Mihaela Zidarn; Matija Rijavec
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines.

Authors:  F Estelle R Simons; Motohiro Ebisawa; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Bernard Y Thong; Margitta Worm; Luciana Kase Tanno; Richard F Lockey; Yehia M El-Gamal; Simon Ga Brown; Hae-Sim Park; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 10.  Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: How Does Venom Immunotherapy Prevent Anaphylaxis From Bee and Wasp Stings?

Authors:  Umit Murat Sahiner; Stephen R Durham
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.