| Literature DB >> 24447057 |
Antonia C Lyons1, Carol Emslie, Kate Hunt.
Abstract
Public health approaches have frequently conceptualised alcohol consumption as an individual behaviour resulting from rational choice. We argue that drinking alcohol needs to be understood as an embodied social practice embedded in gendered social relationships and environments. We draw on data from 14 focus groups with pre-existing groups of friends and work colleagues in which men and women in mid-life discussed their drinking behaviour. Analysis demonstrated that drinking alcohol marked a transitory time and space that altered both women's and men's subjective embodied experience of everyday gendered roles and responsibilities. The participants positioned themselves as experienced drinkers who, through accumulated knowledge of their own physical bodies, could achieve enjoyable bodily sensations by reaching a desired level of intoxication (being in the zone). These mid-life adults, particularly women, discussed knowing when they were approaching their limit and needed to stop drinking. Experiential and gendered embodied knowledge was more important in regulating consumption than health promotion advice. These findings foreground the relational and gendered nature of drinking and reinforce the need to critically interrogate the concept of alcohol consumption as a simple health behaviour. Broader theorising around notions of gendered embodiment may be helpful for more sophisticated conceptualisations of health practices.Entities:
Keywords: alcohol consumption; embodiment; gender; health behaviour
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24447057 PMCID: PMC4211357 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sociol Health Illn ISSN: 0141-9889
Details of focus groups and participants (N = 56)1
| Group type | Participants | Ages | Deprivation category | Alcohol units past week | No. drinking at ‘hazardous’ level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG1 Council workers | 2 M, 2 F | 44–49 | intermediate | 9–15 | 1 F |
| FG2 Male pub friends | 4 M | 44–50 | mixed | 49–90 | 4 M |
| FG3 Lecturers | 2 M, 2 F | 34–49 | mixed | 21–33 | 2 M, 2 F |
| FG4 Female friends | 4 F | 44–48 | affluent/ intermediate | 14–60 | 3 F |
| FG5 Sales workers | 1 M, 4 F | 40–50 | mixed | 9–36 | 1 M, 3 F |
| FG6 Community group (deprived area) | 4 M, 3 F | 41-mid 50s? | deprived | 0–92 | 1 M |
| FG8 Office workers | 4 F | 36–47 | affluent/ intermediate | 0–27 | 2 F |
| FG9 Community group (affluent area) | 3 F | 35–45 | affluent | 3–15 | 1 F |
| FG10 Heterosexual couples | 2 M, 2 F | 32–35 | affluent/ intermediate | 14–28 | 1 M, 1 F |
| FG11 Best friends and girlfriend | 2 M, 1 F | 31–33 | mixed | 25–65 | 2 M, 1 F |
| FG12 Gym group mums | 4 F | 30–31 | deprived | 3–20 | 1 F |
| FG13 Unemployed friends | 2 M | 28–31 | affluent/ intermediate | 29–38 | 2 M |
| FG14 Old school friends | 3 M | 30–32 | deprived | 27–48 | 3 M |
| FG15 Toddler group mums | 5 F | 30–41 | affluent/ intermediate | 1–19 | 1 F |
This dataset excludes group 7, a group of non-drinkers recruited for an alternative perspective on the cultural context of alcohol.
Carstairs scores calculated for residential postcodes: affluent = DEPCAT 1 and 2, intermediate = DEPCAT 3–5, deprived = DEPCAT 6 and 7, mixed = respondents from each of these three categories present in one group.
‘Hazardous’ drinking: more than 21 units/week for men, 14 units/week for women.
Two participants in FG6 did not give their age.
F, female; M, male.