Literature DB >> 24447025

The pH in the microenvironment of human mesenchymal stem cells is a critical factor for optimal osteogenesis in tissue-engineered constructs.

Laurent-Emmanuel Monfoulet1, Pierre Becquart, David Marchat, Katleen Vandamme, Marianne Bourguignon, Elodie Pacard, Véronique Viateau, Herve Petite, Delphine Logeart-Avramoglou.   

Abstract

The present study aimed at elucidating the effect of local pH in the extracellular microenvironment of tissue-engineered (TE) constructs on bone cell functions pertinent to new tissue formation. To this aim, we evaluated the osteogenicity process associated with bone constructs prepared from human Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSC) combined with 45S5 bioactive glass (BG), a material that induces alkalinization of the external medium. The pH measured in cell-containing BG constructs was around 8.0, that is, 0.5 U more alkaline than that in two other cell-containing materials (hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate [HA/TCP] and coral) constructs tested. When implanted ectopically in mice, there was no de novo bone tissue in the BG cell-containing constructs, in contrast to results obtained with either HA/TCP or coral ceramics, which consistently promoted the formation of ectopic bone. In addition, the implanted 50:50 composites of both HA/TCP:BG and coral:BG constructs, which displayed a pH of around 7.8, promoted 20-30-fold less amount of bone tissue. Interestingly, hBMSC viability in BG constructs was not affected compared with the other two types of material constructs tested both in vitro and in vivo. Osteogenic differentiation (specifically, the alkaline phosphatase [ALP] activity and gene expression of RUNX2, ALP, and BSP) was not affected when hBMSC were maintained in moderate alkaline pH (≤7.90) external milieu in vitro, but was dramatically inhibited at higher pH values. The formation of mineralized nodules in the extracellular matrix of hBMSC was fully inhibited at alkaline (>7.54) pH values. Most importantly, there is a pH range (specifically, 7.9-8.27) at which hBMSC proliferation was not affected, but the osteogenic differentiation of these cells was inhibited. Altogether, these findings provided evidence that excessive alkalinization in the microenvironment of TE constructs (resulting, for example, from material degradation) affects adversely the osteogenic differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447025     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  15 in total

Review 1.  Insights into the Role of Magnesium Ions in Affecting Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiantian Qi; Jian Weng; Fei Yu; Weifei Zhang; Guoqing Li; Haotian Qin; Zhen Tan; Hui Zeng
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 2.  Mesenchymal stem cell cultivation in electrospun scaffolds: mechanistic modeling for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ágata Paim; Isabel C Tessaro; Nilo S M Cardozo; Patricia Pranke
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 3.  Clinical and Molecular Perspectives of Reparative Dentin Formation: Lessons Learned from Pulp-Capping Materials and the Emerging Roles of Calcium.

Authors:  Minju Song; Bo Yu; Sol Kim; Marc Hayashi; Colby Smith; Suhjin Sohn; Euiseong Kim; James Lim; Richard G Stevenson; Reuben H Kim
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-01

4.  Vanillin-bioglass cross-linked 3D porous chitosan scaffolds with strong osteopromotive and antibacterial abilities for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jue Hu; Zhuozhi Wang; Jacob M Miszuk; Min Zhu; Thiranjeewa I Lansakara; Alexei V Tivanski; Jeffrey A Banas; Hongli Sun
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 9.381

Review 5.  An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials.

Authors:  Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  The effect of S53P4-based borosilicate glasses and glass dissolution products on the osteogenic commitment of human adipose stem cells.

Authors:  Miina Ojansivu; Ayush Mishra; Sari Vanhatupa; Miia Juntunen; Antonina Larionova; Jonathan Massera; Susanna Miettinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Strategy for achieving standardized bone models.

Authors:  Mikhael Hadida; David Marchat
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  In Vitro Degradation of Borosilicate Bioactive Glass and Poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) Composite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Jenna Tainio; Kaarlo Paakinaho; Niina Ahola; Markus Hannula; Jari Hyttinen; Minna Kellomäki; Jonathan Massera
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Human bone graft cytocompatibility with mesenchymal stromal cells is comparable after thermal sterilization and washing followed by γ-irradiation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Dmitry Labutin; Konstantin Vorobyov; Svetlana Bozhkova; Ekaterina Polyakova; Tatyana Vodopyanova
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  In vitro Evaluation of Porous borosilicate, borophosphate and phosphate Bioactive Glasses Scaffolds fabricated using Foaming Agent for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  E P Erasmus; R Sule; O T Johnson; J Massera; I Sigalas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.