Literature DB >> 24446962

Fever survey highlights significant variations in how infants aged ≤60 days are evaluated and underline the need for guidelines.

Havatzelet Yarden-Bilavsky1, Shai Ashkenazi, Jacob Amir, Yechiel Schlesinger, Efraim Bilavsky.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the common practices for evaluating and treating febrile infants aged ≤60 days in a nationwide survey.
METHODS: Questionnaires were administrated to inpatient paediatric departments in all 25 hospitals in Israel.
RESULTS: Of the 25 centres surveyed (100% response rate), only 36% had written protocols concerning the approach to young febrile infants. The existence of a written protocol was significantly associated with the level of medical centre (tertiary versus primary and secondary, p = 0.041) and with the number of local paediatric infectious disease specialists (p = 0.034). In 13 (52%) hospitals, a normal white blood cell count was defined as 5000-15 000 cells/mL and 20 (80%) centres use C-reactive protein. Hospitalisation was mandatory in most (96%) centres for all neonates aged ≤28 days. Low-risk infants aged 29-60 days were hospitalised in 68.4% of the primary and secondary hospitals, compared with 33.3% tertiary centres. Ampicillin and gentamicin was the routine empiric antibiotic treatment for febrile infant in 92% of centres.
CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist among centres in the evaluation of febrile infants aged ≤60 days exist. These differences reflect the lack of, and highlight the need for, national or international guidelines for the evaluation of fever in this age group. ©2014 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteremia; National survey; Neonatal fever; Rochester criteria; Sepsis work-up; Serious bacterial infection; Urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446962     DOI: 10.1111/apa.12560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  4 in total

1.  Association of clinical practice guidelines with emergency department management of febrile infants ≤56 days of age.

Authors:  Paul L Aronson; Cary Thurm; Derek J Williams; Lise E Nigrovic; Elizabeth R Alpern; Joel S Tieder; Samir S Shah; Russell J McCulloh; Fran Balamuth; Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Evaline A Alessandrini; Whitney L Browning; Angela L Myers; Mark I Neuman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Emergency department and inpatient clinical decision tools for the management of febrile young infants among tertiary paediatric centres across Canada.

Authors:  Brett Burstein; Jocelyn Gravel; Paul L Aronson; Mark I Neuman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Expectant parents' understanding of the implications and management of fever in the neonate.

Authors:  Sara R Ahronheim; David McGillivray; Skye Barbic; David Barbic; Stephanie Klam; Paul Brisebois; Kristen Lambrinakos-Raymond; Joe Nemeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Affecting Length of Stay in Well-appearing Febrile Infants.

Authors:  Madeline Mier; James W Antoon; Sarah Sefcovic; Seema Awatramani; Andrew Kreppel; Sara Boblick Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.