Literature DB >> 24446817

Measures of stored red blood cell quality.

J R Hess1.   

Abstract

Blood banking underpins modern medical care, but blood storage, necessary for testing and inventory management, reduces the safety and efficacy of individual units of red blood cells (RBCs). Stored RBCs are damaged by the accumulation of their own waste products, by enzymatic and oxidative injury, and by metabolically programmed cell death. These chemical activities lead to a complex RBC storage lesion that includes haemolysis, reduced in vivo recovery, energy and membrane loss, altered oxygen release, reduced adenosine tri-phosphate and nitric oxide secretion, and shedding of toxic products. These toxic products include lysophospholipids that can cause transfusion-related acute lung injury, free iron that can potentiate infections and cause inflammation, and shed microvesicles that can scavenge nitric oxide and potentiate inflammation and thrombosis. However, most of the obvious negative outcomes of RBC storage are uncommon and appear to be related to exceptionally bad units. Generally, the quality of stored RBCs is highly related to the conditions of storage, so refrigerator temperature, intact bags, residual leucocyte counts and visible haemolysis remain excellent general measures. Specific biochemical measures, such as adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (DPG) concentrations, calcium and potassium content or lipid breakdown products, require specialized measures that are not widely available, involve destructive testing and generally reflect only a part of the storage lesion. This review describes a number of components of the storage lesion and their measurement and attempts to access the utility of the measures.
© 2014 International Society of Blood Transfusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood product development; blood product regulation; blood safety; erythrocytes; transfusion safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446817     DOI: 10.1111/vox.12130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  46 in total

Review 1.  Red blood cell components: time to revisit the sources of variability.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Hemolysis During Sepsis.

Authors:  Katharina Effenberger-Neidnicht; Matthias Hartmann
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.092

3.  Quantifying morphological heterogeneity: a study of more than 1 000 000 individual stored red blood cells.

Authors:  N Z Piety; S C Gifford; X Yang; S S Shevkoplyas
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Established and theoretical factors to consider in assessing the red cell storage lesion.

Authors:  James C Zimring
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Duration of red blood cell storage and inflammatory marker generation.

Authors:  Caroline Sut; Sofiane Tariket; Ming Li Chou; Olivier Garraud; Sandrine Laradi; Hind Hamzeh-Cognasse; Jerard Seghatchian; Thierry Burnouf; Fabrice Cognasse
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  Purinergic control of red blood cell metabolism: novel strategies to improve red cell storage quality.

Authors:  Kaiqi Sun; Angelo D'alessandro; Yang Xia
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Multi-omics Evidence for Inheritance of Energy Pathways in Red Blood Cells.

Authors:  Erin M M Weisenhorn; Thomas J van T Erve; Nicholas M Riley; John R Hess; Thomas J Raife; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Transfusion of fresh vs. older red blood cells in the context of infection.

Authors:  H Klein; C Natanson; W Flegel
Journal:  ISBT Sci Ser       Date:  2015-04-13

Review 9.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 10.  Haemolysis index for the screening of intravascular haemolysis: a novel diagnostic opportunity?

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.