Literature DB >> 24446651

Intraoperative ultrasonography with a surgeon-manipulated microtransducer during robotic radical prostatectomy.

Sunao Shoji1, Monish Aron, Andre Luis de Castro Abreu, Scott Leslie, Hamed Ahmadi, Mihir M Desai, Inderbir S Gill, Osamu Ukimura.   

Abstract

Intraoperative transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been reported to lead to a reduction in surgical margin rates. However, the use of a surgeon-controlled ultrasound probe that allows for precise manipulation and direct interpretation of the image by a console surgeon has yet to be studied. The aim of the present study was to show initial feasibility using the microtransducer with 9-mm scan length controlled by the console surgeon during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 10 patients. The transducer is designed as a drop-in probe with a flexible cord for insertion through a laparoscopic port, and is controlled by a robotic arm with the ultrasonographic image shown as a console Tile-pro display. Intraoperative localization of the biopsy-proven cancerous hypoechoic lesion was feasible in four out of four cases. The microtransducer facilitated identification of the bladder neck as well as the appropriate level of neurovascular bundle release. Negative surgical margin was achieved in all 10 cases (100%), even though five of 10 patients (50%) had extraprostatic (pT3) disease. Recovery of erectile function and continence was encouraging. In conclusion, intraoperative ultrasound navigation using a drop-type microtransducer is a novel technique that could enhance the incremental value of the standard information.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraoperative; prostate cancer; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; surgical navigation; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446651     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel Technologies in Urologic Surgery: a Rapidly Changing Scenario.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Peter Schatteman; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Development and future prospective of treatment for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Norihiro Koizumi; Soichiro Yuzuriha; Tatsuo Kano; Takahiro Ogawa; Mayura Nakano; Masayoshi Kawakami; Masahiro Nitta; Masanori Hasegawa; Akira Miyajima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  The evolution of image guidance in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Joshua Makary; Danielle C van Diepen; Ranjan Arianayagam; George McClintock; Jeremy Fallot; Scott Leslie; Ruban Thanigasalam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-04

4.  Robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a patient with situs inversus totalis and a vascular anomaly.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sagawa; Sunao Ito; Shunsuke Hayakawa; Shuhei Ueno; Tomotaka Okubo; Tatsuya Tanaka; Ryo Ogawa; Hiroki Takahashi; Yoichi Matsuo; Akira Mitsui; Masahiro Kimura; Shuji Takiguchi
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Direct comparison of low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy using the surgical definition of biochemical recurrence for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideyasu Tsumura; Nobumichi Tanaka; Tomohiko Oguchi; Takuya Owari; Yasushi Nakai; Isao Asakawa; Kazuyoshi Iijima; Haruaki Kato; Iwao Hashida; Ken-Ichi Tabata; Takefumi Satoh; Hiromichi Ishiyama
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.