Literature DB >> 24446583

Profiling oil sands mixtures from industrial developments and natural groundwaters for source identification.

Richard A Frank1, James W Roy, Greg Bickerton, Steve J Rowland, John V Headley, Alan G Scarlett, Charles E West, Kerry M Peru, Joanne L Parrott, F Malcolm Conly, L Mark Hewitt.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify chemical components that could distinguish chemical mixtures in oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) that had potentially migrated to groundwater in the oil sands development area of northern Alberta, Canada. In the first part of the study, OSPW samples from two different tailings ponds and a broad range of natural groundwater samples were assessed with historically employed techniques as Level-1 analyses, including geochemistry, total concentrations of naphthenic acids (NAs) and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy (SFS). While these analyses did not allow for reliable source differentiation, they did identify samples containing significant concentrations of oil sands acid-extractable organics (AEOs). In applying Level-2 profiling analyses using electrospray ionization high resolution mass spectrometry (ESI-HRMS) and comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOF/MS) to samples containing appreciable AEO concentrations, differentiation of natural from OSPW sources was apparent through measurements of O2:O4 ion class ratios (ESI-HRMS) and diagnostic ions for two families of suspected monoaromatic acids (GC × GC-TOF/MS). The resemblance between the AEO profiles from OSPW and from 6 groundwater samples adjacent to two tailings ponds implies a common source, supporting the use of these complimentary analyses for source identification. These samples included two of upward flowing groundwater collected <1 m beneath the Athabasca River, suggesting OSPW-affected groundwater is reaching the river system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446583     DOI: 10.1021/es500131k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Beyond Naphthenic Acids: Environmental Screening of Water from Natural Sources and the Athabasca Oil Sands Industry Using Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Mark P Barrow; Kerry M Peru; Brian Fahlman; L Mark Hewitt; Richard A Frank; John V Headley
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Petroleum-derived naphthenic acids disrupt hormone-dependent sexual behaviours in male Western clawed frogs.

Authors:  Wo Su Zhang; Elizabeth J Farmer; Daniella Muhanzi; Vance L Trudeau
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Diamondoid naphthenic acids cause in vivo genetic damage in gills and haemocytes of marine mussels.

Authors:  Awantha Dissanayake; Alan G Scarlett; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Peptide-functionalized iron oxide magnetic nanoparticle for gold mining.

Authors:  Wei-Zheng Shen; Sibel Cetinel; Kumakshi Sharma; Elham Rafie Borujeny; Carlo Montemagno
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Fathead Minnows Exposed to Organic Compounds from Oil Sands Tailings as Embryos Have Reduced Survival, Impaired Development, and Altered Behaviors That Persist into Larval Stages.

Authors:  Jessie S Reynolds; Brianna L Jackson; Barry N Madison; Chris K Elvidge; Richard A Frank; Caleb T Hasler; John V Headley; L Mark Hewitt; Kerry M Peru; Sarah B Yakimowski; Diane M Orihel
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 6.  A critical review of the ecological status of lakes and rivers from Canada's oil sands region.

Authors:  Tim J Arciszewski; Roderick R O Hazewinkel; Monique G Dubé
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Evidence of low toxicity of oil sands process-affected water to birds invites re-evaluation of avian protection strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Beck; Judit E G Smits; Colleen Cassady St Clair
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  A deconvolutional Bayesian mixing model approach for river basin sediment source apportionment.

Authors:  William H Blake; Pascal Boeckx; Brian C Stock; Hugh G Smith; Samuel Bodé; Hari R Upadhayay; Leticia Gaspar; Rupert Goddard; Amy T Lennard; Ivan Lizaga; David A Lobb; Philip N Owens; Ellen L Petticrew; Zou Zou A Kuzyk; Bayu D Gari; Linus Munishi; Kelvin Mtei; Amsalu Nebiyu; Lionel Mabit; Ana Navas; Brice X Semmens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Advances in Distinguishing Groundwater Influenced by Oil Sands Process-Affected Water (OSPW) from Natural Bitumen-Influenced Groundwaters.

Authors:  L Mark Hewitt; James W Roy; Steve J Rowland; Greg Bickerton; Amila DeSilva; John V Headley; Craig B Milestone; Alan G Scarlett; Susan Brown; Christine Spencer; Charles E West; Kerry M Peru; Lee Grapentine; Jason M E Ahad; Hooshang Pakdel; Richard A Frank
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Non-target profiling of bitumen-influenced waters for the identification of tracers unique to oil sands processed-affected water (OSPW) in the Athabasca watershed of Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Craig B Milestone; Chenxing Sun; Jonathan W Martin; Greg Bickerton; James W Roy; Richard A Frank; L Mark Hewitt
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.586

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.