Literature DB >> 24446240

Implementation of a quality improvement initiative in Belgian diabetic foot clinics: feasibility and initial results.

Kris Doggen, Kristien Van Acker, Hilde Beele, Isabelle Dumont, Patricia Félix, Patrick Lauwers, Astrid Lavens, Giovanni A Matricali, Caren Randon, Eric Weber, Viviane Van Casteren, Frank Nobels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article aims to describe the implementation and initial results of an audit-feedback quality improvement initiative in Belgian diabetic foot clinics.
METHODS: Using self-developed software and questionnaires, diabetic foot clinics collected data in 2005, 2008 and 2011, covering characteristics, history and ulcer severity, management and outcome of the first 52 patients presenting with a Wagner grade ≥ 2 diabetic foot ulcer or acute neuropathic osteoarthropathy that year. Quality improvement was encouraged by meetings and by anonymous benchmarking of diabetic foot clinics.
RESULTS: The first audit-feedback cycle was a pilot study. Subsequent audits, with a modified methodology, had increasing rates of participation and data completeness. Over 85% of diabetic foot clinics participated and 3372 unique patients were sampled between 2005 and 2011 (3312 with a diabetic foot ulcer and 111 with acute neuropathic osteoarthropathy). Median age was 70 years, median diabetes duration was 14 years and 64% were men. Of all diabetic foot ulcers, 51% were plantar and 29% were both ischaemic and deeply infected. Ulcer healing rate at 6 months significantly increased from 49% to 54% between 2008 and 2011. Management of diabetic foot ulcers varied between diabetic foot clinics: 88% of plantar mid-foot ulcers were off-loaded (P10-P90: 64-100%), and 42% of ischaemic limbs were revascularized (P10-P90: 22-69%) in 2011.
CONCLUSIONS: A unique, nationwide quality improvement initiative was established among diabetic foot clinics, covering ulcer healing, lower limb amputation and many other aspects of diabetic foot care. Data completeness increased, thanks in part to questionnaire revision. Benchmarking remains challenging, given the many possible indicators and limited sample size. The optimized questionnaire allows future quality of care monitoring in diabetic foot clinics.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audit-feedback; diabetic foot; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446240     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  4 in total

1.  Does the Belgian diabetes type 2 care trajectory improve quality of care for diabetes patients?

Authors:  Viviane F A Van Casteren; Nathalie H E Bossuyt; Sarah J S Moreels; Geert Goderis; Katrien Vanthomme; Johan Wens; Etienne W De Clercq
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2015-07-13

2.  Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Integrated Care: The Case of the Diabetic Foot Pathway in Tuscany.

Authors:  Sabina Nuti; Barbara Bini; Tommaso Grillo Ruggieri; Alberto Piaggesi; Lucia Ricci
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulceration: study protocol for adaptation and validation of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in Dutch-speaking patients.

Authors:  Wahid Rezaie; Flora Lusendi; Kris Doggen; Giovanni Matricali; Frank Nobels
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Decreasing rates of major lower-extremity amputation in people with diabetes but not in those without: a nationwide study in Belgium.

Authors:  Heiner Claessen; Herve Avalosse; Joeri Guillaume; Maria Narres; Tatjana Kvitkina; Werner Arend; Stephan Morbach; Patrick Lauwers; Frank Nobels; Jacques Boly; Chris Van Hul; Kris Doggen; Isabelle Dumont; Patricia Felix; Kristien Van Acker; Andrea Icks
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 10.122

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.