Literature DB >> 24445759

A single-arm, open-label, expanded access study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma in the United States.

Lawrence Flaherty1, Omid Hamid, Gerald Linette, Lynn Schuchter, Sigrun Hallmeyer, Rene Gonzalez, C Lance Cowey, Anna Pavlick, Fred Kudrik, Brendan Curti, David Lawson, Paul B Chapman, Kim Margolin, Antoni Ribas, David McDermott, Keith Flaherty, Lee Cranmer, F Stephen Hodi, Bann-Mo Day, Rolf Linke, John Hainsworth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This open-label, multicenter study was designed to allow access to vemurafenib for patients with metastatic melanoma, bridging the time between end of enrollment in the phase III registration trial (December 2010) and commercial availability following US Food and Drug Administration approval of vemurafenib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma (August 2011). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic melanoma with a BRAF mutation (detected by the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test). Unlike previous vemurafenib trials, patients with poor performance status (PS) and treated brain metastases were permitted. Enrolled patients received oral vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily.
RESULTS: Of 374 patients enrolled at 29 US sites (December 2010 to October 2011), 371 patients received vemurafenib and were followed up for a median of 2.8 months (the study had a prespecified end upon vemurafenib approval and commercial availability). At baseline, most patients (75%) had stage M1c disease, and 19% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 2 or 3; 72% of patients had received prior systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma, 27% received prior ipilimumab, and 29% radiotherapy for prior brain metastases. Because reassessment data to confirm response were not available for most patients, point estimates of objective response rate (ORR) are reported. Among 241 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 54% (median time to response, 1.9 months). The ORR in non-central nervous system sites in patients with previously treated brain metastases (n = 68) was 53%. The ORR in prior ipilimumab-treated patients (n = 68) was 52%. For patients with PS of 0 or 1 (n = 210) and 2 or 3 (n = 31), the ORRs were 55%, and 42%, respectively. The safety profile observed was consistent with that reported in previous studies. The number of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was higher in patients with PS 2 or 3 than in those with PS 0 or 1 (10% vs. 5%, respectively). Adverse events requiring a dose reduction (at least 1 level) occurred in 11% of patients, and 9 patients (2%) experienced events leading to vemurafenib withdrawal, including 2 with repeated QT interval prolongation. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed the established rapid and high tumor response rate achievable with vemurafenib in BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. Several groups not included in previous studies, including patients with previously treated brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 2 to 3, or previous ipilimumab treatment had benefitted from vemurafenib similar to the overall population. No new safety signals were detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445759      PMCID: PMC4705837          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  9 in total

1.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Vemurafenib for melanoma metastases to the brain.

Authors:  Nicole M Rochet; Lisa A Kottschade; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Vemurafenib sensitivity skin reaction after ipilimumab.

Authors:  James J Harding; Melissa Pulitzer; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Mario E Lacouture; Madeleine Duvic; Axel Hauschild; Victor G Prieto; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Caroline C Kim; Christopher J McCormack; Patricia L Myskowski; Olivia Spleiss; Kerstin Trunzer; Fei Su; Betty Nelson; Keith B Nolop; Joseph F Grippo; Richard J Lee; Matthew J Klimek; James L Troy; Andrew K Joe
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline.

Authors:  Claus Garbe; Ketty Peris; Axel Hauschild; Philippe Saiag; Mark Middleton; Alain Spatz; Jean-Jacques Grob; Josep Malvehy; Julia Newton-Bishop; Alexander Stratigos; Hubert Pehamberger; Alexander Eggermont
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States.

Authors:  Eleni Linos; Susan M Swetter; Myles G Cockburn; Graham A Colditz; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 9.  Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  R M MacKie; A Hauschild; A M M Eggermont
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Bowel perforation associated with robust response to BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for BRAF-mutant melanoma: a case report.

Authors:  Samantha L Kass; Allison F Linden; Patrick G Jackson; Pedro A De Brito; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-05-18

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy: Best Practices in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management: Part 2.

Authors:  Hui-Ming Chang; Tochukwu M Okwuosa; Tiziano Scarabelli; Rohit Moudgil; Edward T H Yeh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Cytotoxic and Targeted Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Sanjay Chandrasekhar; Michael G Fradley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-25

4.  Primary and Metastatic Cutaneous Melanomas Express ALK Through Alternative Transcriptional Initiation.

Authors:  Klaus J Busam; Ricardo E Vilain; Trina Lum; Jonathan A Busam; Travis J Hollmann; Robyn P M Saw; Daniel C Coit; Richard A Scolyer; Thomas Wiesner
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Primary and Metastatic Melanoma With NTRK Fusions.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Alexander N Shoushtari; Charlotte Ariyan; Travis J Hollmann; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Advances in the treatment of aortic valve disease: is it time for companion diagnostics?

Authors:  Robert B Hinton
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 7.  Electrophysiologic Toxicity of Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Merna A Armanious; Shreya Mishra; Michael G Fradley
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Preliminary analysis of distinct clinical and biologic features of bone metastases in melanoma.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson; Judy Zhong; Paul Johannet; Yesung Lee; Natasha Masub; Todd Wechter; Una Moran; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Jeffrey Weber; Anna Pavlick; Iman Osman
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Long-term drug costs per life-month gained associated with first-line treatments for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Jun S Liu; Sumati Rao
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-11

10.  Melanoma Expressed-CD70 Is Regulated by RhoA and MAPK Pathways without Affecting Vemurafenib Treatment Activity.

Authors:  Christine Pich; Iotefa Teiti; Guillaume Sarrabayrouse; Franck Gallardo; Rémi Gence; Anne-Françoise Tilkin-Mariamé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.