Emma Devenney1, Michael Hornberger2, Muireann Irish3, Eneida Mioshi2, James Burrell2, Rachel Tan2, Matthew C Kiernan4, John R Hodges2. 1. Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia2Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia. 2. Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia3School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 3. Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia4School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 4. Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia5Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: While advances have been made in characterizing the C9ORF72 clinical phenotype, the hallmark features that discriminate between carriers and noncarriers remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of the C9ORF72 mutation in a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohort and to define the clinical, neuropsychological, behavioral, and imaging features of C9ORF72 mutation carriers in comparison with noncarriers in a well-defined behavioral-variant (bv)-FTD cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study of patients assessed during a 5-year period from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012, at an FTD specialist referral center (FRONTIER). A total of 114 consecutive patients with FTD, FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and corticobasal syndrome were assessed at FRONTIER. Patients with bvFTD who carried the C9ORF72 mutation (n = 10) were compared with noncarriers (n = 19) and a healthy control group (n = 35). These were matched for age, sex, and education history. Blood sampling for gene analysis was performed after informed consent was obtained. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical, behavioral, cognitive, and neuropsychological deficits, cortical atrophy on a magnetic resonance imaging visual rating scale, and family history as quantified by the Goldman Scale. RESULTS: In a cohort of 114 FTD cases, 14 patients expressed the C9ORF72 mutation, representing a frequency rate of 34% in bvFTD and 17% in FTD-ALS. Family histories of ALS (P = .001) and psychiatric disorders (P = .02) were significantly more common in mutation carriers. The C9ORF72 carriers were also more likely to experience psychotic symptoms (P = .03). The degree of brain atrophy was significantly less in the C9ORF72 cohort, and in many the progression was slow. Presenting features of C9ORF72 carriers were compared against International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for bvFTD, and most cases failed to satisfy criteria for probable bvFTD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The C9ORF72 mutation appears to be a common cause of bvFTD. Many of the C9ORF72 carriers have a family history of ALS or psychiatric illness. Psychotic features emerged as the most discriminating clinical feature between mutation carriers and noncarriers. Progression is often slow and brain atrophy is less pronounced than in nonmutation cases of bvFTD. These findings have clinical relevance for both diagnosis and selection of patients for genetic testing.
IMPORTANCE: While advances have been made in characterizing the C9ORF72 clinical phenotype, the hallmark features that discriminate between carriers and noncarriers remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of the C9ORF72 mutation in a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohort and to define the clinical, neuropsychological, behavioral, and imaging features of C9ORF72 mutation carriers in comparison with noncarriers in a well-defined behavioral-variant (bv)-FTD cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study of patients assessed during a 5-year period from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012, at an FTD specialist referral center (FRONTIER). A total of 114 consecutive patients with FTD, FTD-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and corticobasal syndrome were assessed at FRONTIER. Patients with bvFTD who carried the C9ORF72 mutation (n = 10) were compared with noncarriers (n = 19) and a healthy control group (n = 35). These were matched for age, sex, and education history. Blood sampling for gene analysis was performed after informed consent was obtained. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical, behavioral, cognitive, and neuropsychological deficits, cortical atrophy on a magnetic resonance imaging visual rating scale, and family history as quantified by the Goldman Scale. RESULTS: In a cohort of 114 FTD cases, 14 patients expressed the C9ORF72 mutation, representing a frequency rate of 34% in bvFTD and 17% in FTD-ALS. Family histories of ALS (P = .001) and psychiatric disorders (P = .02) were significantly more common in mutation carriers. The C9ORF72 carriers were also more likely to experience psychotic symptoms (P = .03). The degree of brain atrophy was significantly less in the C9ORF72 cohort, and in many the progression was slow. Presenting features of C9ORF72 carriers were compared against International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for bvFTD, and most cases failed to satisfy criteria for probable bvFTD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The C9ORF72 mutation appears to be a common cause of bvFTD. Many of the C9ORF72 carriers have a family history of ALS or psychiatric illness. Psychotic features emerged as the most discriminating clinical feature between mutation carriers and noncarriers. Progression is often slow and brain atrophy is less pronounced than in nonmutation cases of bvFTD. These findings have clinical relevance for both diagnosis and selection of patients for genetic testing.
Authors: Nikolas R Block; Sharon J Sha; Anna M Karydas; Jamie C Fong; Mary G De May; Bruce L Miller; Howard J Rosen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Kieren Po; Felicity V C Leslie; Natalie Gracia; Lauren Bartley; John B J Kwok; Glenda M Halliday; John R Hodges; James R Burrell Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mary K Floeter; Bryan J Traynor; Jennifer Farren; Laura E Braun; Michael Tierney; Edythe A Wiggs; Tianxia Wu Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lars M Ittner; Glenda M Halliday; Jillian J Kril; Jürgen Götz; John R Hodges; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mary Clare McKenna; We Fong Siah; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 3.978