Literature DB >> 24445514

Rapid learning for precision oncology.

Jeff Shrager1, Jay M Tenenbaum2.   

Abstract

The emerging paradigm of Precision Oncology 3.0 uses panomics and sophisticated methods of statistical reverse engineering to hypothesize the putative networks that drive a given patient's tumour, and to attack these drivers with combinations of targeted therapies. Here, we review a paradigm termed Rapid Learning Precision Oncology wherein every treatment event is considered as a probe that simultaneously treats the patient and provides an opportunity to validate and refine the models on which the treatment decisions are based. Implementation of Rapid Learning Precision Oncology requires overcoming a host of challenges that include developing analytical tools, capturing the information from each patient encounter and rapidly extrapolating it to other patients, coordinating many patient encounters to efficiently search for effective treatments, and overcoming economic, social and structural impediments, such as obtaining access to, and reimbursement for, investigational drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445514     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  58 in total

Review 1.  Diseases as network perturbations.

Authors:  Antonio del Sol; Rudi Balling; Lee Hood; David Galas
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Adaptive designs in clinical drug development--an Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group.

Authors:  Paul Gallo; Christy Chuang-Stein; Vladimir Dragalin; Brenda Gaydos; Michael Krams; José Pinheiro
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 3.  A rapid-learning health system.

Authors:  Lynn M Etheredge
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Clinical implications of the cancer genome.

Authors:  Laura E Macconaill; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Computational and experimental approaches for modeling gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  J Goutsias; N H Lee
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 6.  Envisioning Watson as a rapid-learning system for oncology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Biomedicine. Rare cancer successes spawn 'exceptional' research efforts.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells.

Authors:  Katia Basso; Adam A Margolin; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Ulf Klein; Riccardo Dalla-Favera; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Leveraging models of cell regulation and GWAS data in integrative network-based association studies.

Authors:  Andrea Califano; Atul J Butte; Stephen Friend; Trey Ideker; Eric Schadt
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; Li Ding; Dong Shen; Jingqin Luo; Vera J Suman; John W Wallis; Brian A Van Tine; Jeremy Hoog; Reece J Goiffon; Theodore C Goldstein; Sam Ng; Li Lin; Robert Crowder; Jacqueline Snider; Karla Ballman; Jason Weber; Ken Chen; Daniel C Koboldt; Cyriac Kandoth; William S Schierding; Joshua F McMichael; Christopher A Miller; Charles Lu; Christopher C Harris; Michael D McLellan; Michael C Wendl; Katherine DeSchryver; D Craig Allred; Laura Esserman; Gary Unzeitig; Julie Margenthaler; G V Babiera; P Kelly Marcom; J M Guenther; Marilyn Leitch; Kelly Hunt; John Olson; Yu Tao; Christopher A Maher; Lucinda L Fulton; Robert S Fulton; Michelle Harrison; Ben Oberkfell; Feiyu Du; Ryan Demeter; Tammi L Vickery; Adnan Elhammali; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Sandra McDonald; Mark Watson; David J Dooling; David Ota; Li-Wei Chang; Ron Bose; Timothy J Ley; David Piwnica-Worms; Joshua M Stuart; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcement learning improves behaviour from evaluative feedback.

Authors:  Michael L Littman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Opportunities for translational epidemiology: the important role of observational studies to advance precision oncology.

Authors:  Michael Marrone; Richard L Schilsky; Geoff Liu; Muin J Khoury; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2019

4.  Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle D Jones; Chris Krenz; Michele Gornick; Rebecca Spence; Raymond De Vries; Sarah T Hawley; Robin Zon; Sage Bolte; Navid Sadeghi; Richard L Schilsky; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Tissue-Specific Signaling Networks Rewired by Major Somatic Mutations in Human Cancer Revealed by Proteome-Wide Discovery.

Authors:  Junfei Zhao; Feixiong Cheng; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Radiogenomics: Identification of Genomic Predictors for Radiation Toxicity.

Authors:  Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 7.  Bioinformatic approaches to augment study of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tim N Beck; Adaeze J Chikwem; Nehal R Solanki; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 8.  Improving Cancer Treatment via Mathematical Modeling: Surmounting the Challenges Is Worth the Effort.

Authors:  Franziska Michor; Kathryn Beal
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Computational oncology--mathematical modelling of drug regimens for precision medicine.

Authors:  Dominique Barbolosi; Joseph Ciccolini; Bruno Lacarelle; Fabrice Barlési; Nicolas André
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  How Will Big Data Improve Clinical and Basic Research in Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Barry S Rosenstein; Jacek Capala; Jason A Efstathiou; Jeff Hammerbacher; Sarah L Kerns; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Harry Ostrer; Fred W Prior; Bhadrasain Vikram; John Wong; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.