Literature DB >> 24445332

Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: describing and remembering object location.

Kenny R Coventry1, Debra Griffiths2, Colin J Hamilton2.   

Abstract

Spatial demonstratives - terms including this and that - are among the most common words across all languages. Yet, there are considerable differences between languages in how demonstratives carve up space and the object characteristics they can refer to, challenging the idea that the mapping between spatial demonstratives and the vision and action systems is universal. In seven experiments we show direct parallels between spatial demonstrative usage in English and (non-linguistic) memory for object location, indicating close connections between the language of space and non-linguistic spatial representation. Spatial demonstrative choice in English and immediate memory for object location are affected by a range of parameters - distance, ownership, visibility and familiarity - that are lexicalized in the demonstrative systems of some other languages. The results support a common set of constraints on language used to talk about space and on (non-linguistic) spatial representation itself. Differences in demonstrative systems across languages may emerge from basic distinctions in the representation and memory for object location. In turn, these distinctions offer a building block from which non-spatial uses of demonstratives can develop.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Distance; Lexical distinctions; Object knowledge; Spatial demonstratives; Vision and action

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445332     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Cues of control modulate the ascription of object ownership.

Authors:  Claudia Scorolli; Anna M Borghi; Luca Tummolini
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-06

2.  Perspective in the conceptualization of categories.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Lawrence Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-26

3.  Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Roberta Rocca; Sofia Stroustrup
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-08

4.  This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives.

Authors:  David Peeters; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

5.  This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.

Authors:  Roberta Rocca; Kristian Tylén; Mikkel Wallentin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Demonstrative Reference and Semantic Space: A Large-Scale Demonstrative Choice Task Study.

Authors:  Roberta Rocca; Mikkel Wallentin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-07

7.  Space Trumps Time When Talking About Objects.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Andre Bester; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-03

8.  Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino.

Authors:  Kate Mesh; Emiliana Cruz; Joost van de Weijer; Niclas Burenhult; Marianne Gullberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition.

Authors:  Harmen B Gudde; Debra Griffiths; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction.

Authors:  Roberta Rocca; Mikkel Wallentin; Cordula Vesper; Kristian Tylén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.