Literature DB >> 24445034

Spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular traction demonstrated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

George P Theodossiadis1, Vlassis G Grigoropoulos2, Sofia Theodoropoulou3, Ioannis Datseris4, Panagiotis G Theodossiadis3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the natural course of idiopathic vitreomacular traction (VMT) with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) from the vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) stage to the spontaneous resolution of VMT.
DESIGN: Prospective observational case series.
METHODS: We studied the natural course of idiopathic VMT in 46 eyes (46 patients), divided into those that proceeded to spontaneous VMT resolution (12 cases) and those that remained at the VMT stage (34 cases). All patients were examined with SDOCT at regular 3-month intervals. We recorded the vitreomacular angle of VMA nasally and temporally, the horizontal diameter of VMA, macular thickness, visual acuity, photoreceptor layer, and external limiting membrane.
RESULTS: In the 12 eyes that proceeded to spontaneous resolution, the vitreous adhesion angle had a mean increase of 38 degrees at VMT, compared to the angle at the VMA stage. In the 34 eyes that remained at the VMT stage, the mean angle of traction increased by only 1 degree throughout follow-up. In all 46 patients, the angle at the VMT stage was significantly associated with traction resolution (nasally P = .001, temporally P < .001). The likelihood of resolution was more than 99% lower for patients with a VMT diameter >400 μm compared with that of eyes with a VMT diameter <400 μm. Patients with broad-type VMT remained at the same stage, whereas patients with V-type VMT had 80% probability of resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous VMT resolution is negatively associated with the horizontal adhesion diameter. The strength of the traction exerted by the vitreous on the fovea seems to be positively related to the size of the vitreomacular angle.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445034     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  20 in total

1.  The design and validation of an optical coherence tomography-based classification system for focal vitreomacular traction.

Authors:  D H W Steel; L Downey; K Greiner; H Heimann; T L Jackson; Z Koshy; D A H Laidlaw; L Wickham; Y Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of the horizontal diameter to a modeled area of traction in eyes with vitreomacular traction: is the diameter close enough to the truth?

Authors:  Christoph Paul; P Krug; H H Müller; J Wachtlin; S Mennel; S Müller; S Schmitz-Valckenberg; T Bertelmann; R G Schumann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Evolution of vitreomacular adhesion to acute vitreofoveal separation with special emphasis on a traction-induced foveal pathology. A prospective study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  George P Theodossiadis; Irini P Chatziralli; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Ioannis Datseris; Panagiotis G Theodossiadis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Importance of morphological and functional diagnostics of the vitreoretinal interface].

Authors:  W J Mayer; R G Schumann; A Kampik; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Letter of response to "Comment re: Comparison of the horizontal diameter to a modeled area of traction in eyes with vitreomacular traction: is the diameter close enough to the truth?"

Authors:  C Paul; T Bertelmann; R G Schumann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comment re: Comparison of the horizontal diameter to a modeled area of traction in eyes with vitreomacular traction: is the diameter close enough to the truth?

Authors:  Sofia Theodoropoulou; George P Theodossiadis; Vlassis G Grigoropoulos; Panagiotis G Theodossiadis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A novel spectral-domain optical coherence tomography model to estimate changes in vitreomacular traction syndrome.

Authors:  Marco Codenotti; Lorenzo Iuliano; Giovanni Fogliato; Giuseppe Querques; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Real-life experience after intravitreal ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography prospective study.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; George Theodossiadis; Efstratios Parikakis; Ioannis Datseris; Panagiotis Theodossiadis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Ocriplasmin for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion.

Authors:  James E Neffendorf; Varo Kirthi; Edward Pringle; Timothy L Jackson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-17

10.  Ocriplasmin treatment for vitreomacular traction in real life: can the indication spectrum be expanded?

Authors:  Kleanthis Manousaridis; Silvia Peter-Reichart; Stefan Mennel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.