Literature DB >> 24445021

Individual differences during acquisition predict shifts in generalization.

Matthew G Wisniewski1, Barbara A Church2, Eduardo Mercado2.   

Abstract

Learning to distinguish subtle differences in objects or events can impact how one generalizes. In some cases, training can cause novel events to appear more familiar or attractive than those actually experienced during training: the peak shift effect. This study examined whether individual differences in learning led to systematic patterns of generalization. Participants were trained to identify simulated birdsongs, and then tested on their ability to identify a target song presented among several similar songs that differed in pitch. Initial analysis showed that those attaining moderate proficiency at discriminating songs during training were more likely to shift than those performing poorly or proficiently. However, a neural network trained to output individuals' gradient dynamics using only performance during training as input found an additional set of training variables that predicted shift. Specifically, one subset of shifters had highly conservative response biases accompanied by very little change to perceptual sensitivity in training. These findings suggest that discrimination learning may only lead to generalization shifts in some individuals, and that all individuals who shift may not do so for the same reason.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural network; Generalization gradient; Individual differences; Peak shift; Perceptual learning; Signal detection theory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445021     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  Easy-to-hard effects in perceptual learning depend upon the degree to which initial trials are "easy".

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado; Milen L Radell; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

2.  Predicting favorable and unfavorable consequences of perceptual learning: worsening and the peak shift.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brain dynamics that correlate with effects of learning on auditory distance perception.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory.

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Matthew G Wisniewski; Helen L Williams; Jane M Berry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.