Boronic acid affinity gels are important for effective separation of biological active cis-diols, and are finding applications both in biotech industry and in biomedical research areas. To increase the efficacy of boronate affinity separation, it is interesting to introduce repeating boronic acid units in flexible polymer chains attached on solid materials. In this work, we synthesize polymer brushes containing boronic acid repeating units on silica gels using surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). A fluorescent boronic acid monomer is first prepared from an azide-tagged fluorogenic boronic acid and an alkyne-containing acrylate by Cu(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction (the CuAAC click chemistry). The boronic acid monomer is then grafted to the surface of silica gel modified with an ATRP initiator. The obtained composite material contains boronic acid polymer brushes on surface and shows favorable saccharide binding capability under physiological pH conditions, and displays interesting fluorescence intensity change upon binding fructose and glucose. In addition to saccharide binding, the flexible polymer brushes on silica also enable fast separation of a model glycoprotein based on selective boronate affinity interaction. The synthetic approach and the composite functional material developed in this work should open new opportunities for high efficiency detection, separation, and analysis of not only simple saccharides, but also glycopeptides and large glycoproteins.
panclass="Chemical">Boronic acid affinity gels are important for effective seclass="Chemical">paration of biological active class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">cis-diols, and are finding applications both in biotech industry and in biomedical research areas. To increase the efficacy of boronate affinity separation, it is interesting to introduce repeating boronic acid units in flexible polymer chains attached on solid materials. In this work, we synthesize polymer brushes containing boronic acid repeating units on silica gels using surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). A fluorescent boronic acid monomer is first prepared from an azide-tagged fluorogenic boronic acid and an alkyne-containing acrylate by Cu(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction (the CuAAC click chemistry). The boronic acid monomer is then grafted to the surface of silica gel modified with an ATRP initiator. The obtained composite material contains boronic acid polymer brushes on surface and shows favorable saccharide binding capability under physiological pH conditions, and displays interesting fluorescence intensity change upon binding fructose and glucose. In addition to saccharide binding, the flexible polymer brushes on silica also enable fast separation of a model glycoprotein based on selective boronate affinity interaction. The synthetic approach and the composite functional material developed in this work should open new opportunities for high efficiency detection, separation, and analysis of not only simple saccharides, but also glycopeptides and large glycoproteins.
panclass="Chemical">Carbohydrates
exist widely in nature and act as one of the most essential units
constituting glycoproteins and nucleic acids. class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Carbohydrates play important
roles in living organisms by acting as structural materials, energy
sources, and in controlling cellular communications in different biological
processes. For biomedical applications, it is highly desirable that
saccharide-sensitive systems can respond selectively under physiological
conditions (i.e., in aqueous solution at neutral pH).[1−6] With their well-known property of forming reversible cyclic ester
bond with diols, phenylboronic acids have been utilized to design
functional materials for separation and detection of saccharides.[7−19] The covalent bond formed between phenylboronic acid and the hydroxyl
groups of saccharides (1,2- or 1,3-diols) leads to a five- or six-membered
ring structure, which is stable under alkaline conditions. Compared
to other synthetic receptors that can afford saccharide binding, boronic
acid has much higher affinity and provides high flexibility in giving
functional materials for separation and sensing of biological cis-diol
compounds.
For many practical applications, immobilization on
a solid support allows panclass="Chemical">boronic acid to be easily recovered for repeated
use.[20−22] class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Boronic acid has also been incorporated into polymers
to enable more advanced molecular recognition with functional polymers
and supramolecular structures.[23−28] Also, boron-containing polymers represent an important class of
materials that are extensively used, for example, as electrolyte materials,
blue emissive polymers, self-healing materials, flame-retardants,
and responsive carriers for controlled drug delivery.[29−34]
Various panclass="Chemical">boronic acid ligands have been developed in the class="Chemical">past.
The common feature of these ligands is that they contain one class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic
acid moiety able to bind cis-diols, and one functional
group (e.g., amino, thiol, or polymerizable vinyl group) that can
be used for immobilization on solid support.[20,35−38] In a previous work, we developed a clickable boronic acid, 3-(2-azido-acetylamino)phenylboronic
acid (APBA) by introducing a terminal azide into commercially available
3-aminophenyl boronic acid.[21] Interestingly,
after APBA was conjugated to alkyne-functionalized material via Cu(I)-catalyzed
azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) click reaction (which changed
the terminal azide into a triazole ring),[39] the immobilized boronic acid displayed obvious fluorescence response
to saccharides.[21,22] The previous results suggest
that the clickable APBA may be conjugated with other vinyl monomers
via the same CuAAC click reaction, thereby leading to fluorogenic
polymers that can be synthesized by different radical polymerization
methods. With boronic acid-based vinyl monomer available, it should
be possible to synthesize new functional polymers containing a high
density of pendentboronic acid. The presence of multiple boronic
acids in a single polymer chain should also be interesting for studying
multivalent interactions between saccharides and synthetic polymers.
Because of their mechanical stability, high surface area, and ease
of surface functionalization, panclass="Chemical">silica gels have been utilized extensively
as solid support for seclass="Chemical">paration purposes, e.g., as stationary phase
in liquid chromatography and solid phase extraction. To increase the
density of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid ligand on solid support, we are particularly
interested in grafting boronic acid-functionalized polymers (polymer
brushes) on silica surface. In the literature, grafting of phenylboronic
acid polymer has been achieved using free radical polymerization of
acrylamidophenylboronic acid in the presence of surface-immobilized
chain transfer agent.[40,41] During the polymerization, the
surface-bound transfer agent (mercaptopropyl group) captured some
of the growing radicals in solution to give the surface-bound polymer
brushes. The disadvantage of this approach is that only a small portion
of the monomers can be turned into surface-bound polymer brush. Besides,
under traditional radical polymerization condition, it is impossible
to control the sequence and molecular weight of the polymer brushes,
making it difficult to control the selectivity and the stimuli-response
property of the polymer brush. These problems may be addressed by
using more sophisticated, surface-initiated, controlled radical polymerization
(CRP) techniques, because CRP allows more precise control of polymer
structure (in terms of sequence and molecular weight), and surface-initiated
CRP only generates polymer brushes on surface with no polymer product
in solution. Among the different CRP methods that can be adopted to
graft polymer brushes on surface, atom transfer radical polymerization
(ATRP) is the most popular, partly because it is straightforward to
immobilize ATRP initiator on many different surfaces.[42−45] Although ATRP can be used to synthesize polymers containing many
different functional groups,[46−48] it remains challenging to achieve
direct polymerization of boronic acid-containing monomers by ATRP.[29]
In this work, we first synthesized a new
fluorescent panclass="Chemical">boronic acid monomer (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">APBA-PA) by conjugating APBA with
propargyl acrylate using Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition
(CuAAC) reaction, and grafted a homopolymer of APBA-PA on silica using
surface initiated ATRP. The use of CuAAC offered the fluorogenic boronic
acid monomer while the surface initiated ATRP made it possible to
produce only the surface bound polymer brushes. We characterized the
silica–polymer composite using FT-IR, fluorescence microscopy,
spectrofluorometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA), solid-state 11B NMR spectroscopy and X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). We also studied the molecular binding
characteristics of the composite material and its fluorescence response
to fructose and glucose under physiological pH conditions. In addition
to binding simple saccharides, we also demonstrate that the flexible
polymer brushes on silica are able to bind large glycoprotein (horseradish
peroxidase) through selective boronate affinity interaction.
Experimental Section
Materials
panclass="Chemical">Aminopropyl silica gel (class="Chemical">particle size 15–35
μm, pore size ∼9 nm) was purchased from Fluka. Bromoacetyl
class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">bromide, 3-aminophenylboronic acid hemisulfate, CuSO4,
CuBr (98%), sodium ascorbate, sodium azide, tris(2-dimethylaminoethyl)amine
(Me6TREN), Alizarin Red S (ARS), propargyl acrylate, 2-bromoisobutyryl
bromide, D-fructose, d-glucose, hydrofluoric acid (>40%),
methylsulfoxide-d6 (99.9 atom % D), horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) (lyophilized powder, ∼ 150 U/mg), H2O2 solution (30%) and 4-aminoantipyrine were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich. Phenol (99.5%) was obtained from Merck. CuBr was
stirred overnight in acetic acid, filtered, washed with acetone and
dried in vacuo before use. Tetrahydrofuran (THF), 2-propanol and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) of analytical grade were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Ultrapure
water (18.2 MΩ cm) obtained from an ELGA LabWater System (Vivendi
Water Systems Ltd.) was used throughout the experiments. APBA was
synthesized according to a published procedure.[21]
Synthesis of Boronic Acid
Monomer APBA-PA
panclass="Chemical">APBA (0.219 g, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in
6 mL of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">methanol:water (2:1, v/v). To the solution propargyl acrylate
(PA, 110 μL, 1.0 mmol), 200 μL of CuSO4 (100
mM in water) and 3.0 mL of sodium ascorbate (100 mM in water) were
added. The solution was purged with a stream of nitrogen gas for 5
min, sealed, and stirred at room temperature for 48 h. After the solvent
was removed using a rotary evaporator, the dry product was dissolved
in a mixture of ethyl acetate and water (1:1, v/v). The ethyl acetate
phase was collected, washed with water, and dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate. After the solvent was removed with a rotary evaporator, the
crude product was recrystallized twice from n-hexane: ethyl acetate
(1:5, v/v) to give APBA-PA as a pale yellow solid. Yield: 53%.1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 10.41 (broad,
1H, NH), 8.22 (s, 1H, NCH=C),
8.04 (s, 2H, B(OH)2], 7.29–7.86
(broad, 4H, C6H4), 6.36 (d,
1H, COCH=C), 6.22 (broad, 1H, COCH=CHa), 5.97 (broad, 1H, COCH=CHb), 5.34 (s, 2H, NHCOCH2),
5.26 (s, 2H, COOCH2). 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): δ 165.7, 164.5, 141.9, 138.0,
132.6, 130.0, 128.5, 128.3, 127.1, 125.7, 121.6, 57.8, 52.6. FT-IR
ν (cm–1): 3290, 3144, 1675, 1615, 1548, 1411,
1332, 1175, 1051, 993, 813, 724. Anal. Calcd for C14H15BN4O5: C, 50.94; H, 4.58; N, 16.97.
Found: C, 51.3; H, 4.80; N, 16.1.
Immobilization
of ATRP Initiator on Silica
panclass="Chemical">Aminopropyl silica (0.5 g) and
class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">triethylamine (0.80 mL, 5.8 mmol) were mixed in THF (12 mL) and cooled
on an ice–water bath. To the suspension was slowly added 2-bromoisobutyryl
bromide (1.15 g, 5.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was warmed to room
temperature and stirred overnight. The silica particles (Si@initiator)
were isolated by centrifugation, washed with water and methanol, and
dried in a vacuum chamber.
Grafting Poly(APBA-PA)
on Silica Using Surface-Initiated ATRP
panclass="Chemical">APBA-PA (1.329 g,
4.0 mmol), CuBr (0.0144 g, 0.10 mmol) and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">2-propanol (15.0 mL) were
added to a 100 mL flask. The mixture was deoxygenated by bubbling
with nitrogen gas for 40 min. After addition of Me6TREN
(0.0276 g, 0.12 mmol) through a syringe, the solution was stirred
for 20 min to allow formation of the CuBr/Me6TREN complex.
The initiator-immobilized silica gel (0.20 g) was then added to start
the polymerization. The reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C
and magnetically stirred under nitrogen atmosphere for 48 h. After
the reaction, the silica particles modified with poly(APBA-PA) (Si@poly(APBA-PA))
were isolated by centrifugation, and washed thoroughly with water
and methanol until no fluorescence emission could be observed from
the supernatant.
Removal of Silica by Hydrofluoric
Acid Etching
To remove the panclass="Chemical">silica gel from the composite
material, 0.100 g of the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) grafted silica particles were
transferred into a plastic tube and stirred in 6.0 mL of hydrofluoric
acid: water (1:1) at room temperature for 12 h. After this step, the
polymer precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed with water,
methanol, and then dried in a vacuum chamber.
Measurement
of Fluorescence Response to Monosaccharides
To a set of 15
mL calibrated test tubes, 2.0 mg of panclass="Chemical">silica class="Chemical">particles, 0.5 mL of 0.20
M class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">phosphate buffer (PBS) (pH 7.4), and a given concentration of saccharide
solution were sequentially added. The mixture was then diluted to
2.5 mL with ultrapure water and gently shaken on a rocking table.
Fluorescence spectra were collected after 2 h. To maintain a stable
particle suspension, the samples were stirred with a built-in magnetic
stirrer during the fluorescence measurement.
Separation
of Monosaccharides Using Si@poly(APBA-PA)
To a set of 15
mL calibrated test tubes, 3.0 mg of Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA), 0.5 mL of 0.20
M class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PBS (pH 7.4) and a given concentration of monosaccharide solution
were added. The initial concentrations of the monosaccharides were
2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mM, respectively. The mixture was then
diluted to 3.0 mL with ultrapure water, and gently shaken on a rocking
table for 2 h. After the silica particles were removed by centrifugation,
the concentration of the monosaccharide in the supernatant was determined
using a competition assay as described in our previous publication.[22] The amount of fructose bound to the particles
was calculated by subtracting the amount of free fructose from the
initial amount of fructose added. The results reported were mean values
from triplicate independent samples.
Binding
of Glycoprotein with Si@poly(APBA-PA)
panclass="Species">Horseradish peroxidase
(HRP, 1 mg/mL) was dissolved in 1 mL of buffer containing 3 mg of
Si@class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) particles. The suspension was gently stirred at 20
°C for 1 h and then centrifuged. After removing supernatant,
the particles were washed in the same buffer (20 °C, 1 h) two
times, and isolated by centrifugation. To test the enzyme activity
on the particles, the particles were mixed with 1 mL of freshly prepared
substrate solution (obtained by mixing 0.75 mL of 1.7 mM H2O2 in 0.1 M PBS buffer at pH 9.0 and 0.7 mL of an aqueous
solution of 2.5 mM 4-aminoantipyrine with 0.17 M phenol) and shaken
for 2 min. After centrifugation, the particles were removed, and the
UV–vis absorption of the supernatant at 510 nm was measured.
For comparison, HRP binding to the initiator-modified particles (Si@initiator)
was also tested following the same procedure.
Separation
of Glycoprotein Using Si@poly(APBA-PA)
Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) class="Chemical">particles
(50 mg) were class="Chemical">packed into a glass column equipped with a class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PTFE frit.
The particles were conditioned with 0.1 M PBS buffer at pH 9.0 before
2 mL of HRP solution (prepared in the same buffer) was passed through
the column at a flow rate of ∼1 mL/min. The column was then
washed with 2 mL of 0.1 M PBS buffer at pH 9.0 for 2 times. Finally,
the bound HRP was eluted with 2 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer
at pH 4.6. The concentration of HRP in the different fractions was
calculated from the results of enzyme activity assay as described
in the literature.[49]
Characterization
Attenuated total reflection (ATR)
infrared spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer FTIR instrument
(Perkin-Elmer Instruments). The fluorescence emission was measured
using a QuantaMaster C-60/2000 spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology
International, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA). panclass="Chemical">1H and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">13C NMR spectra were recorded on a superconducting magnet NMR spectroscopy
400 MHz (Bruker B-ACS60). Solid-state 11B MAS NMR experiments
were performed on a Bruker 500 MHz Avance III instrument in the Chemical
Biological Center, Umeå University. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS) analysis was carried out using a spectrometer with a Mg Kα (excitation 1253.6 eV) X-ray source. For fluorescence
microscopy imaging, samples were deposited on a glass slide and observed
under a Nikon Eclipse E400 epifluorescence microscope equipped with
a CCD camera. The conditions of measurement were: exposure time: 0.2
s, readout rate: 1 MHz at 16-bit, preamplifier gain: 5×, output
amplifier: conventional. Elemental analysis was carried out using
a Vario EL CHNS elemental analyzer (Elementar, Germany). The surface
morphologies of silica particles were observed with a scanning electron
microscope (SEM; JEOLJSM-T300). Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA)
was performed in synthetic air using a TGS-2 thermogravimetric analyzer
(Perkin–Elmer, USA). The samples were heated from 40 to 700
°C at 10 °C/min and held for 30 min.
Results and Discussion
Material Synthesis and
Characterization
In a previous work, we observed unexpected
fluorescence emission of the panclass="Chemical">azide-tagged class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid APBA. More
importantly, this boronic acid remained the interesting fluorescence
property after its azide group was conjugated with an alkyne compound
to form a triazole ring.[21,22] On the basis of these
previous results, we considered it possible to use straightforward
CuAAC to synthesize APBA-based vinyl monomers by coupling APBA with
commercially available alkyne-terminated monomer, e.g., PA. We expected
the new monomers and their polymer product to display also favorable
fluorescence property and affinity to saccharides similar to APBA.
Synthesis of panclass="Chemical">APBA-PA via CuAAC was straightforward, giving
class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">polymerizable boronic acid containing a triazole spacer (Scheme 1). As we expected, APBA-PA displayed fluorescence
excitation and emission spectra very similar to its precursor APBA.
Figure 1 shows that when APBA-PA in methanol
was excited at 380 nm, it emitted fluorescence with maximum emission
at 447 nm. Using coumarin 343 as a reference,[50] we estimated the fluorescence quantum yield of APBA-PA in methanol
to be 0.08, which is similar to the value of 0.06 for APBA measured
in our previous work.[21]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Boronic Acid Monomer APBA-PA
Figure 1
Fluorescence excitation
(dotted line) and emission spectra (solid line) of APBA-PA in methanol.
Fluorescence excitation
(dotted line) and emission spectra (solid line) of panclass="Chemical">APBA-PA in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">methanol.
Scheme 2 describes the process of grafting panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) on class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">silica. First,
an ATRP initiator was immobilized by reacting 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide
with aminopropyl silica. In the second step, surface-initiated polymerization
of APBA-PA was carried out on the surface of the initiator-modified
silica particles.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Poly(APBA-PA) on Silica Using Surface-Initiated
ATRP
In Figure 2, FT-IR spectra of the panclass="Chemical">silica class="Chemical">particles after different surface
modifications are presented. Comclass="Chemical">pared with class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">aminopropyl silica (Figure 2, curve a), the IR spectrum of the initiator-modified
silica shows characteristic amide band at 1648 cm–1 and amide II band at 1533 cm–1 (Figure 2, curve b), confirming that the ATRP initiator has
been successfully conjugated to the aminopropyl silica. After the
surface-initiated ATRP, the composite silica displayed characteristic
IR bands for C–H stretching (2950 cm–1),
C=O stretching (1730 cm–1 corresponding to
ester bonds) and amide (1685 cm–1 and 1548 cm–1) (Figure 2, curve c). These
new IR bands suggest that new organic polymer has formed on the silica
particles.
Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of (a) aminopropyl silica, (b) Si@initiator, and
(c) Si@poly(APBA-PA).
FT-IR spectra of (a) panclass="Chemical">aminopropyl silica, (b) Si@initiator, and
(c) Si@class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA).
To provide more unambiguous proof of surface-grafted panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA),
we investigated the fluorescence property of Si@class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) suspended
in methanol. As a control sample, we also measured the fluorescence
spectra of the initiator-modified silica particles. As can be seen
in Figure 3, Si@poly(APBA-PA) emitted strong
fluorescence at 433 nm when it was excited at 380 nm. Compared to
the monomer APBA-PA, the maximum fluorescence emission of the surface-grafted
poly(APBA-PA) upshifted by 14 nm. The shorter emission wavelength
of the polymer may be explained as the following: when APBA-PA was
incorporated into the polymer brushes, the fluorophore was moved into
a less polar environment because of the presence of the polymer backbone,
thereby leading to an upshifted emission. In contrast to Si@poly(APBA-PA),
the initiator-modified silica displayed almost no fluorescence emission.
On the basis of the strong fluorescence emission, we can conclude
that poly(APBA-PA) has been successfully grafted on silica through
the surface-initiated ATRP. Si@poly(APBA-PA) particles were also imaged
with a fluorescent microscope and compared with the initiator-modified
silica. From Figure 4, it is clear that the
polymer-modified silica particles are fluorescent because of the boronic
acid polymer grafted on the surface.
Figure 3
Fluorescence emission spectra of (a) Si@initiator
and (b) Si@poly(APBA-PA) in methanol. Particle concentration 1.0 mg/mL,
λex = 380 nm. To avoid the effect of light scattering
caused by the particles, we recorded the emission spectra in the range
of 400–600 nm.
Figure 4
Fluorescence
microscope images of (a) Si@poly(APBA-PA) and (b) Si@initiator. The
maximum fluorescence intensity was (a) 6.5 × 105 and
(b) 6.7 × 104.
Fluorescence emission spectra of (a) Si@initiator
and (b) Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">methanol. Particle concentration 1.0 mg/mL,
λex = 380 nm. To avoid the effect of light scattering
caused by the particles, we recorded the emission spectra in the range
of 400–600 nm.
The SEM image in Figure 5a reveals
that the surface grafted panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) formed aggregates on class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">silica
under desolvated condition. The surface morphology of the composite
Si@poly(APBA-PA) particles is very different from the initiator-modified
silica (that has a much smoother surface, Figure 5b). The significant change of the surface morphology after
the ATRP suggests that poly(APBA-PA) has been grafted on silica. The
aggregates observed in Figure 5a can be explained
as collapsed polymer chains under the desolvated condition.
Figure 5
SEM images of (a) Si@poly(APBA-PA) and (b) Si@initiator.
Fluorescence
microscope images of (a) Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) and (b) Si@initiator. The
maximum fluorescence intensity was (a) 6.5 × 105 and
(b) 6.7 × 104.
SEM images of (a) Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) and (b) Si@initiator.
To further prove the proposed panclass="Chemical">boronic acid structure
in Si@class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) particles, we analyzed the composite material
using solid state 11B MAS NMR. As shown in Figure S1 in
the Supporting Information, the 11B spectrum has one broad signal at around 18 ppm and one signal close
to 0 ppm, which can be assigned to the three- and four-coordinated
boron atoms in the polymer brush, respectively. The pattern of this 11B spectrum is in agreement with that of poly(4-vinylbenzylboronic
acid) reported in the literature.[51] From
the XPS results shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information, it is clear that after poly(APBA-PA) was grafted,
the N 1s signal from the particles increased significantly. In Figure 6a, the O 1s signal from Si@poly(APBA-PA) is contributed
by two types of O atoms in the ester (532 eV) and in the boronic acid
structure (534 eV).[52,53] The C 1s signal from the composite
particles can be fitted with five peaks with binding energies at 284,
285, 286.2, 287.5, and 289 eV, corresponding to aromatic C, aliphatic
C, O=C–N in amide, O=C–O in ester, and
C–O, respectively (Figure 6b).[52,54] Although the XPS signals from B 1s and Br 3p overlap in the range
of 180–195 eV, making it impossible to distinguish these two
elements, the collective results from the solid-state 11B NMR and XPS analyses indicate clearly that poly(APBA-PA) has been
successfully grafted on the silica particles.
Figure 6
Characterization of Si@poly(APBA-PA)
by XPS analysis. Photoelectron spectrum of (a) O 1s and (b) C 1s.
Characterization of Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA)
by XPS analysis. Photoelectron spectrum of (a) O 1s and (b) C 1s.
In a previous work, we showed
that a panclass="Chemical">boronic acid-functionalized ATRP initiator failed to produce
class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid-terminated polyNIPAm.[22] Compared
to the previous work, the successful synthesis of poly(APBA-PA) using
surface-initiated ATRP suggests that the structure of the initiator
plays an important role. The major difference between these two systems
is that the previous ATRP initiator was linked to a phenylboronic
acid through a flexible spacer. Considering possible intramolecular
hydrogen bond, it may be that the boronic acid moiety in the previous
system could be located very close to the terminal bromide, which
generated significant steric hindrance for initiating the ATRP.
To determine the content of the organicpanclass="Chemical">polymer in Si@class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA),
we used hydrofluoric acid to etch the silica gel from 100 mg of the
composite material. This treatment left 29.4 mg of polymer, implying
that the polymer content in Si@poly(APBA-PA) was ∼29.4%.
The results of elemental analysis for the different materials are
listed in Table 1. On the basis of the panclass="Chemical">nitrogen
content in the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">aminopropyl silica, we estimated the density of aminopropyl
group on the aminopropyl silica to be ∼0.871 mmol/g. Table 1 shows that immobilization of the ATRP initiator
resulted in an obviously increased content of C and H, whereas the
content of N slightly decreased. This result can be explained by that
the ATRP initiator has a high C and H content, but has no N in its
structure. The content of C, H, and N further increased after APBA-PA
was graft-polymerized on the silica surface. The obviously higher
N content in Si@poly(APBA-PA) than in the other two types of silica
particles can be easily explained: the boronic acid monomer has three
N atoms in the triazole spacer and one N atom in the amide group,
which after polymerization caused the higher N content in the composite
material.
Table 1
Elemental Analysis Results
C (%)
H (%)
N (%)
aminopropyl
silica
5.27
1.19
1.22
Si@initiator
7.72
1.37
1.11
Si@poly(APBA-PA)
16.07
1.94
4.31
The content
of organic materials in the three different panclass="Chemical">silica class="Chemical">particles was further
investigated by TGA analysis. In Figure 7,
the class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">weight loss (approximately 4%) below 250 °C can be attributed
to the evaporation of residual organic solvent and water. The weight
loss in the temperature range of 250–550 °C can be attributed
to the thermal degradation of the organic materials. Because the weight
loss of the aminopropyl silica and the initiator-modified silica in
this temperature range were 11.7 and 19.7%, respectively, the density
of the initiator immobilized on the silica particles was calculated
to be 0.637 mmol/g. Considering the aboundance of aminopropyl group
on the silica support was ∼0.871 mmol/g, we found that ∼73.1%
of the amino groups on the silica support could be converted into
surface-bound ATRP initiators.
Figure 7
TGA analysis of the different silica particles.
TGA analysis of the different panclass="Chemical">silica class="Chemical">particles.
The TGA curve for Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA)
in Figure 7 shows a major decomposition in
the temperature range of 250–550 °C, which can be attributed
to the thermal degradation of the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid polymer grafted on
the silica. When the temperature reached 700 °C, the residual
weight was 64.7%. Thus, the polymer content in Si@poly(APBA-PA) can
be calculated to be 31.2%. This value is close to that obtained by
etching the composite material with hydrofluoric acid (29.4%). Based
on these TGA results, the content of the boronic acid monomer (APBA-PA)
in the composite Si@poly(APBA-PA) particles can be estimated to be ∼0.781
mmol/g. Considering that the density of the immobilized ATRP initiator
on the silica was 0.637 mmol/g, we can conclude that the ATRP took
place only from a small fraction of the surface-immobilized initiator
sites. This result is in agreement with the nonuniform polymer grafting
on silica observed in the SEM image of Si@poly(APBA-PA) (Figure 5a).
Effect of pH on cis-Diol Binding
Previously, we proposed that the
panclass="Chemical">triazole ring connecting the fluorogenic class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">APBA with an alkyne compound
can maintain a dative N–B bond, making the conjugated product
able to bind saccharides under neutral pH condition.[21,22] To study the impact of pH on saccharide binding, we took the advantage
of the immobilized polymer brush (allowing easy separation), and the
fact that ARS can form covalent bond with phenylboronic acid within
a relatively broad pH range.[55] To confirm
that ARS binding to APBA-PA is insensitive to pH variation, we first
incubated Si@poly(APBA-PA) with ARS in different buffers. After separating
the particles by centrifugation, the supernatant was diluted with
0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) before its UV–vis absorption was measured.
As shown in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information, the uptake of ARS (∼90%) by Si@poly(APBA-PA) is almost constant
within the range of pH 4.6–9.0. Following this verification,
we designed a simple displacement experiment in which we tested if
high concentration of fructose can disrupt the binding between ARS
and the APBA-PA units. In these experiments, we utilized the fact
that binding of ARS to phenylboronic acid is accompanied by a strong
fluorescence emission. If fructose can disrupt the covalent bond,
it will cause the fluorescence intensity to decrease. Thus the reduction
of fluorescence intensity can be used to estimate the potency of fructose
to displace ARS from APBA-PA in solution. Figure 8a–c show the effect of adding fructose into a solution
of ARS and APBA-PA at different pH values. At pH 4.6, fructose only
caused a small reduction of the fluorescence intensity (Figure 8a). At pH 7.4 and 9.0, addition of the same amount
of fructose almost completely diminished the fluorescence (Figure 8b, c), indicating nearly quantitative disruption
of the ARS: APBA-PA complex. On the basis of these results, we can
conclude that saccharide binding with APBA-PA (and the corresponding
polymer brush) is favored under neutral and basic conditions, but
not under acidic condition.
Figure 8
Displacement of ARS from APBA-PA by fructose
in (a) 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 4.6; (b) 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4; (c) and
0.1 M PBS, pH 9.0. The dotted line represents the fluorescence of
a solution containing 0.1 mM ARS and 0.1 mM APBA-PA at the given pH.
The solid line represents the fluorescence of the same solution after
addition of fructose powder (final concentration 100 mM).
Displacement of panclass="Chemical">ARS from class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">APBA-PA by fructose
in (a) 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 4.6; (b) 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4; (c) and
0.1 M PBS, pH 9.0. The dotted line represents the fluorescence of
a solution containing 0.1 mM ARS and 0.1 mM APBA-PA at the given pH.
The solid line represents the fluorescence of the same solution after
addition of fructose powder (final concentration 100 mM).
Fluorescence Responses
of Si@poly(APBA-PA)
In previous studies, we have shown that
the fluorescence intensity of panclass="Chemical">APBA increases after it binds class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">cis-diol compounds.[21] To investigate
if this kind of fluorescence response to cis-diol compounds remains
after APBA is linked to PA, we measured the fluorescence spectra of
Si@poly(APBA-PA) in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) in the presence of different
amount of fructose and glucose. Figure 9 shows
the change of fluorescence emission of Si@poly(APBA-PA) when increasing
amount of fructose and glucose was added into a suspension of Si@poly(APBA-PA)
in PBS buffer. Clearly, the intensity of fluorescence emission of
the particles increased with the increasing of fructose and glucose
concentration. This result confirms that the fluorescence response
remains after the terminal azide of APBA was changed into the triazole
structure of APBA-PA, which is in agreement with our previous results.[21,22] The increased fluorescence caused by saccharide can be explained
as a result of the dative B–N bond[56,57] that is stabilized by cis-diol binding. From Figure 9, we can see that the degree of fluorescence enhancement caused
by fructose is higher than glucose. This phenomenon can be explained
by the fact that fructose binds to phenylboronic acid with an affinity
higher than glucose.[11] It is worth to note
that in this work, the corresponding fluorescence response was observed
under physiological pH conditions, which makes the fluorescence-responsive
materials more suitable for direct analysis of biological samples.
Figure 9
Fluorescence
spectra of Si@poly(APBA-PA) (0.80 mg/mL) in 50 mM PBS buffer, pH 7.4,
measured in the presence of different amounta of (a) fructose and
(b) glucose. λex = 374 nm.
Fluorescence
spectra of Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) (0.80 mg/mL) in 50 mM class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PBS buffer, pH 7.4,
measured in the presence of different amounta of (a) fructose and
(b) glucose. λex = 374 nm.
Separation of Monosaccharides Using Si@poly(APBA-PA)
By immobilizing panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) on class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">silica particles, it becomes straightforward
to separate saccharides using simple filtration or centrifugation.
The capability of using Si@poly(APBA-PA) to separate monosaccharide
was investigated using fructose as a model through equilibrium binding
experiments. The binding isotherm of fructose to Si@poly(APBA-PA)
was examined using different fructose concentrations in the range
of 0–10.0 mM. After equilibrium binding, the silica particles
were settled by centrifugation. The concentration of fructose in the
supernatant was then determined through a three-component competitive
assay, where the fructose caused a dose-dependent reduction of fluorescence
intensity of a mixture of ARS and 3-aminophenylboronic acid).[22] The amount of fructose bound to Si@poly(APBA-PA)
was then calculated by subtracting the concentration of free fructose
from the initial fructose concentration. For comparison, the initiator-modified
silica was used as a control to evaluate the nonspecific binding caused
by the silica matrix. As shown in Figure 10, the amount of fructose bound to Si@poly(APBA-PA) increased with
the increasing concentration of fructose. The binding reached saturation
when the initial concentration of fructose was 6.0 mM, which corresponds
to a maximum binding capacity of 0.49 mmol/g of Si@poly(APBA-PA).
In contrast, the initiator-modified silica particles did not show
obvious fructose binding. Therefore, it is clear that the saccharide
binding to composite Si@poly(APBA-PA) particles is contributed by
the specific interaction between the saccharide and the surface-grafted
boronic acid polymer. Although the reported value of saccharide binding
is moderate, it should be possible to use ATRP to produce longer polymer
brushes so that the binding capacity can be further increased. In
addition, surface-initiated ATRP may also be used to prepare copolymer
brushes containing an optimal boronic acid sequence and density, which
are important for achieving multidentate binding to oligosaccharides
and glycoproteins.
Figure 10
Affinity binding of fructose by poly(APBA-PA) grafted
silica (■) and initiator-immobilized silica (▲). Standard
deviation of saccharide binding ≤0.015 mmol/g (n = 3).
Affinity binding of panclass="Chemical">fructose by class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(APBA-PA) grafted
silica (■) and initiator-immobilized silica (▲). Standard
deviation of saccharide binding ≤0.015 mmol/g (n = 3).
Glycoprotein
Separation
Besides binding simple panclass="Chemical">monosaccharides, we also
expected the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boronic acid polymer brush immobilized on silica to offer
a convenient tool for separation of large biomolecules containing cis-diols, e.g., glycoproteins. To test this possibility,
we selected horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a model to find out if
Si@poly(APBA-PA) can separate this glycoprotein from solution. Using
HRP as a model also allows us to investigate if the enzyme remains
catalytically active after binding to the polymer brush. In the first
experiment, Si@poly(APBA-PA) and Si@initiator were incubated with
HRP in two different buffers at pH 4.6 and 9.0. After washing with
the same incubation buffer, the particles were separated and mixed
with a solution of HRP substrate for 2 min. The absorption at 510
nm in the supernatant was immediately measured after removing the
solid particles. Figure 11 shows the results
of the colorimetric assay obtained from the two types of particles.
Clearly, the highest enzyme activity was observed from Si@poly(APBA-PA)
that has been loaded with HRP at pH 9.0. When the incubation was carried
out under acidic condition (pH 4.6), the enzyme activity observed
from Si@poly(APBA-PA) was very low, suggesting that HRP binding under
this condition is negligible. It should be noted that when the same
supernatant was measured for several times, its absorption did not
change, indicating that no enzyme detached from the particles during
the 2 min reaction time. In comparison with Si@poly(APBA-PA), the
more hydrophobic Si@initiator particles displayed high nonspecific
binding that was hardly affected by pH variation (Figure 11). As HRP binding with Si@poly(APBA-PA) in the
acidic buffer (0.1 M acetate, pH 4.6) is very low, it is possible
to use this buffer to recover the bound glycoprotein from the immobilized
polymer brushes.
Figure 11
Activity of HRP on particles as estimated from UV–vis
absorption of the liquid phase. Standard deviation of Abs ≤0.024
(n = 3).
Activity of HRP on particles as estimated from UV–vis
absorption of the liquid phase. Standard deviation of Abs ≤0.024
(n = 3).Selective glycoprotein separation was then demonstrated in
a column mode. Si@panclass="Chemical">poly(APBA-BA) class="Chemical">particles (50 mg) were class="Chemical">packed in a
solid phase extraction (SPE) column and conditioned with 0.1 M class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PBS
buffer at pH 9.0. After passing through 2 mL of HRP in the basic buffer
(1 mg/mL), the column was washed with 2 volumes of the same buffer.
The bound HRP was finally eluted in 2 mL of 0.1 M acetate buffer at
pH 4.6. All the liquid fractions collected were subjected to enzyme
assay to determine the protein concentration. Under the SPE conditions
used, we found that ∼60% of the initially loaded HRP could
be recovered in the elution step, corresponding to a capacity of ∼24
mg HRP/g particles. Apparently, the immobilized boronic acid polymer
brush has played the important role of capturing the glycoprotein
from solution.
Conclusions
In this
work, we have grafted fluorogenicpanclass="Chemical">boronic acid polymer on class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">silica using
surface initiated ATRP. A fluorogenic boronic acid monomer was first
synthesized by conjugation of azide-terminated phenylboronic acid
with propargyl acrylate through CuAAC. Amino-functionalized silica
particles were used to anchor ATRP initiator, which were used directly
to graft the fluorogenic boronic acid polymer. While the use of CuAAC
offered the fluorogenic boronic acid monomer, the surface-initiated
ATRP made it possible to produce only the surface bound polymer brushes.
The composite material obtained maintained the fluorogenic property
of the monomer, and allowed monosaccharides to be easily separated
from solution under physiological pH condition. Because the composite
particles have a high density of boronic acids appended on flexible
polymer chains, the affinity material could also be used to achieve
fast separation of glycoprotein. On the basis of the results obtained
in this work, we believe it possible to employ ATRP to further control
the architecture and sequence of boronic acid polymer on surface,
which should lead to improved molecular selectivity of boronic acid-based
affinity materials. The synthetic approach and the composite functional
material developed in this work should open new opportunities for
high efficiency detection, separation, and analysis of not only simple
saccharides but also glycopeptides and large glycoproteins.
Authors: Alexander E Ivanov; John Eccles; Homayon Ahmad Panahi; Ashok Kumar; Marina V Kuzimenkova; Lars Nilsson; Björn Bergenståhl; Nick Long; Gary J Phillips; Sergey V Mikhalovsky; Igor Yu Galaev; Bo Mattiasson Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.396