Literature DB >> 24444741

Validity evidence based on response processes.

José-Luis Padilla1, Isabel Benítez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validity evidence based on response processes was first introduced explicitly as a source of validity evidence in the latest edition of Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. In this paper, we present the theory, the relationship with other sources of validity evidence, and the methods available for validation studies aimed at obtaining validity evidence about response processes.
METHOD: A comprehensive review of the literature along with theoretical and practical proposals.
RESULTS: The articles provides arguments for determining when validity evidence based on response processes is critical for supporting the use of the test for a particular purpose, and examples of how to perform a validation study to obtain such validity evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: There are methods for obtaining validity evidence based on response processes. Special attention should be paid to validation studies using the cognitive interview method given its features and possibilities. Future research problems pose how to combine data from different methods -qualitative and quantitative-, to develop complete validity arguments that support the use of the test for a particular purpose.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24444741     DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2013.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psicothema        ISSN: 0214-9915


  9 in total

1.  ACGME Milestones in the Real World: A Qualitative Study Exploring Response Process Evidence.

Authors:  Ashley M Maranich; Paul A Hemmer; Sebastian Uijtdehaage; Alexis Battista
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Development and validation of a Chinese translated questionnaire: A single simultaneous tool for assessing gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tract related illnesses in pre-school children.

Authors:  Amy S Y Lau; Muhamad S B Yusoff; Yeong-Yeh Lee; Sy-Bing Choi; Jin-Zhong Xiao; Min-Tze Liong
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-02

3.  Validity Evidence of an Epidemiological Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Screening Questionnaire for Older Adults.

Authors:  Hipólito Virgilio Magalhães Junior; Leandro de Araújo Pernambuco; Renata Veiga Andersen Cavalcanti; Kenio Costa Lima; Maria Angela Fernandes Ferreira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  VR Realism Scale-Revalidation of contemporary VR headsets on a Polish sample.

Authors:  Natalia Lipp; Radosław Sterna; Natalia Dużmańska-Misiarczyk; Agnieszka Strojny; Sandra Poeschl-Guenther; Paweł Strojny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adaptation and Validation of a Test for the Evaluation of Tactical Knowledge in Soccer: Test de Conocimiento Táctico Ofensivo en Fútbol for the Brazilian Context (TCTOF-BRA).

Authors:  Leandro Rechenchosky; Vanessa Menezes Menegassi; Matheus de Oliveira Jaime; Paulo Henrique Borges; Jaime Serra-Olivares; Wilson Rinaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 6.  Questionnaire validation practice within a theoretical framework: a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments.

Authors:  Melanie Hawkins; Gerald R Elsworth; Elizabeth Hoban; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) with Providers in the Early Intervention Setting: A Qualitative Validity Testing Study.

Authors:  Catherine J Leslie; Melanie Hawkins; Diane L Smith
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Validity arguments for patient-reported outcomes: justifying the intended interpretation and use of data.

Authors:  Melanie Hawkins; Gerald R Elsworth; Sandra Nolte; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-30

9.  Development of a Certification Exam to Assess Undergraduate Students' Proficiency in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Core Concepts.

Authors:  Quira Zeidan; Jennifer Loertscher; Adele J Wolfson; John T Tansey; Erika G Offerdahl; Peter J Kennelly; Daniel R Dries; Victoria Del Gaizo Moore; Diane M Dean; L Michael Carastro; Sachel M Villafañe; Ludmila Tyler
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.325

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.