Literature DB >> 24444399

Influence of crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss: a systematic review.

Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmiño1, Fernando Suárez-López del Amo, Alberto Monje, Andrés Catena, Inmaculada Ortega-Oller, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the increased use of short dental implants (<10 mm), a high crown/implant (C/I) ratio has become a common finding. However, the effect of the C/I ratio on the marginal bone loss (MBL) has not yet been examined extensively. Hence, the aim of the present systematic review is to explore the influence of the C/I ratio on the success rate and MBL of dental implants.
METHODS: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central) and a manual search for human trials with a minimal follow-up of 6 months are used for the present study. A statistical analysis of the influence of the C/I ratio was performed on the peri-implant MBL while considering follow-up period, type of implants, implant connection, and technical and biologic complications.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six potential articles were identified on the selected databases. Only 57 articles were selected for full-text evaluation. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 13 articles were included in this systematic review. A significant negative association between the C/I ratio and the MBL was found (P = 0.012). However, no statistically significant difference was found (P >0.15) for potential effects regarding the observation period, the type of implant connection, or between both methods of evaluating the C/I ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, the C/I ratio of implant-supported restorations has an effect on peri-implant marginal bone level. Within the range of 0.6/1 to 2.36/1, the higher the C/I ratio, the less the peri-implant MBL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implant-abutment design; dental implants; dental prosthesis, implant-supported; design implantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24444399     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2014.130615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  16 in total

1.  Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pinar Ercal; Aysegul Erten Taysi; Demet Cagil Ayvalioglu; Meltem Mert Eren; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Stress distribution of various designs of prostheses on short implants or standard implants in posterior maxilla: a three dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Jomjunyong; P Rungsiyakull; C Rungsiyakull; W Aunmeungtong; M Chantaramungkorn; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 3.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Partially Edentulous Atrophic Posterior Mandible with Short Implants (≤ 8 mm) Compared with the Sandwich Osteotomy and Delayed Placement of Standard Length Implants (> 8 mm): a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Helle Baungaard Nielsen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  Guided bone regeneration using K-incision technique.

Authors:  Young-Dan Cho; Young Ku
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study with Eleven 4-Mm Extra-Short Implants Splinted to Longer Implants for Posterior Maxilla Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Daniel Torassa; Pablo Naldini; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Enrique Fernández-Bodereau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16

7.  Can bone marrow aspirate concentrate change the mineralization pattern of the anterior maxilla treated with xenografts? A preliminary study.

Authors:  André Antonio Pelegrine; Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira; Marcelo Sperandio; Thiago Sousa Almada; Karl Erik Kahnberg; Paulo José Pasquali; Antonio Carlos Aloise
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Paweł Kubasiewicz-Ross; Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska; Tomasz Gedrange; Marzena Dominiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-14

10.  Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Henny J A Meijer; Carina Boven; Konstantina Delli; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.