Literature DB >> 24444194

Cyclists and triathletes have different body positions on the bicycle.

Rodrigo Rico Bini1, Patria A Hume, James Croft.   

Abstract

Our study evaluated differences in body position on the bicycle for recreational cyclists, competitive cyclists and triathletes. Thirty-six recreational cyclists, 17 competitive road cyclists and 18 competitive triathletes were assessed for body position on their bicycles on a cycle trainer. Images were taken of cyclists/triathletes in static poses with the crank at the 3 o'clock and 6 o'clock positions. Trunk, pelvis, hip, knee and ankle angles, anterior-posterior and medio-lateral positions of the knees in relation to the pedal axis and frontal projected area were measured using ImageJ. Comparison of body position between groups (recreational, competitive road cyclists and competitive triathletes) was conducted using effects sizes (ES). The greatest differences between groups in the measured variables were observed between the triathletes and the other two groups. Smaller differences were observed between competitive and recreational cyclists. Competitive triathletes had greater body forward projection (10% greater trunk flexion and 66% knee anterior position, ES = 2.5 and 1.2, respectively) and less frontal projected area (17%, ES = 1.3) than competitive road cyclists for body position on the bicycle. Both recreational and competitive cyclists sat on their bicycles with their trunks in a more vertical position compared to triathletes. Guidelines for bicycle configuration for triathletes and road cyclists need to consider the body positions during events.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24444194     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2011.654269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  5 in total

1.  Reply to letter to editor: stereotypes of athletes' use of performance enhancing products.

Authors:  Nkaku Kisaalita; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  THE ROLE of a BIKE FIT in CYCLISTS with HIP PAIN. A CLINICAL COMMENTARY.

Authors:  David J S Wadsworth; Patrick Weinrauch
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-06

3.  Anthropometrics, flexibility and training history as determinants for bicycle configuration.

Authors:  Wendy Holliday; Jeroen Swart
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-04

4.  Evaluation of Accelerometer-Derived Data in the Context of Cycling Cadence and Saddle Height Changes in Triathlon.

Authors:  Stuart A Evans; Daniel A James; David Rowlands; James B Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Long-Term Effects of a Kinematic Bikefitting Method on Pain, Comfort, and Fatigue: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Robson Dias Scoz; Paulo Rui de Oliveira; Cleyton Salvego Santos; Júlia Ribeiro Pinto; Cesar Augusto Melo-Silva; André Filipe Teixeira de Júdice; José João Baltazar Mendes; Luciano Maia Alves Ferreira; César Ferreira Amorim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.