Literature DB >> 24444048

Established and novel disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.

A H Cross1, R T Naismith.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a presumed autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, resulting in inflammatory demyelination and axonal and neuronal injury. New diagnostic criteria that incorporate magnetic resonance imaging have resulted in earlier and more accurate diagnosis of MS. Several immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapeutic agents are available for relapsing forms of MS, which allow individualized treatment based upon the benefits and risks. Disease-modifying therapies introduced in the 1990s, the beta-interferons and glatiramer acetate, have an established track record of efficacy and safety, although they require administration via injection. More recently, monoclonal antibodies have been engineered to act through specific mechanisms such as blocking alpha-4 integrin interactions (natalizumab) or lysing cells bearing specific markers, for example CD52 (alemtuzumab) or CD20 (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab). These agents can be highly efficacious, but sometimes have serious potential complications (natalizumab is associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; alemtuzumab is associated with the development of new autoimmune disorders). Three new oral therapies (fingolimod, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, approved for MS treatment from 2010 onwards) provide efficacy, tolerability and convenience; however, as yet, there are no long-term postmarketing efficacy and safety data in a general MS population. Because of this lack of long-term data, in some cases, therapy is currently initiated with the older, safer injectable medications, but patients are monitored closely with the plan to switch therapies if there is any indication of a suboptimal response or intolerance or lack of adherence to the initial therapy. For patients with MS who present with highly inflammatory and potentially aggressive disease, the benefit-to-risk ratio may support initiating therapy using a drug with greater potential efficacy despite greater risks (e.g. fingolimod or natalizumab if JC virus antibody-negative). The aim of this review is to discuss the clinical benefits, mechanisms of action, safety profiles and monitoring strategies of current MS disease-modifying therapies in clinical practice and of those expected to enter the market in the near future.
© 2014 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multiple sclerosis; therapeutics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24444048     DOI: 10.1111/joim.12203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  49 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis--establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Àlex Rovira; David Miller; Tarek A Yousry; Maria P Sormani; Maria P de Stefano; Mar Tintoré; Cristina Auger; Carmen Tur; Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Franz Fazekas; Ludwig Kappos; Chris Polman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for the Radiologist, Part 1-Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Safety.

Authors:  C McNamara; G Sugrue; B Murray; P J MacMahon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Challenges in randomized controlled trials and emerging multiple sclerosis therapeutics.

Authors:  DeRen Huang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Opportunities for Translation from the Bench: Therapeutic Intervention of the JAK/STAT Pathway in Neuroinflammatory Diseases.

Authors:  Yudong Liu; Sara A Gibson; Etty N Benveniste; Hongwei Qin
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  CRK proteins selectively regulate T cell migration into inflamed tissues.

Authors:  Yanping Huang; Fiona Clarke; Mobin Karimi; Nathan H Roy; Edward K Williamson; Mariko Okumura; Kazuhiro Mochizuki; Emily J H Chen; Tae-Ju Park; Gudrun F Debes; Yi Zhang; Tom Curran; Taku Kambayashi; Janis K Burkhardt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Modulating the immune system through nanotechnology.

Authors:  Tamara G Dacoba; Ana Olivera; Dolores Torres; José Crecente-Campo; María José Alonso
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 7.  MRI and multiple sclerosis--the evolving role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of MS: the radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Alexis M Cahalane; Hugh Kearney; Yvonne M Purcell; Christopher McGuigan; Ronan P Killeen
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Design of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers to Promote Immunological Tolerance.

Authors:  Lisa H Tostanoski; Yu-Chieh Chiu; James I Andorko; Ming Guo; Xiangbin Zeng; Peipei Zhang; Walter Royal; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Reprogramming the Local Lymph Node Microenvironment Promotes Tolerance that Is Systemic and Antigen Specific.

Authors:  Lisa H Tostanoski; Yu-Chieh Chiu; Joshua M Gammon; Thomas Simon; James I Andorko; Jonathan S Bromberg; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Assessing the Value of Treatment to Address Various Symptoms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study.

Authors:  Pei-Jung Lin; Cayla J Saret; Peter J Neumann; Eileen A Sandberg; Joshua T Cohen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.