Literature DB >> 24443950

A multicentric study regarding the use of hormone therapy during female mid-age (REDLINC VI).

J E Blümel, P Chedraui, G Barón, Z Benítez, D Flores, M T Espinoza, G Gomez, E González, L Hernández, S Lima, M Martino, A Montaño, A Monterrosa, D Mostajo, E Ojeda, W Onatra, C Robles, J Saavedra, H Sánchez, K Tserotas, M S Vallejo, C Vallejo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has shown benefits for women; however, associated drawbacks (i.e. risks, costs, fears) have currently determined its low use.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of current HT use among mid-aged women and describe the characteristics of those who have never used, have abandoned or are currently using HT. In addition, reasons for not using HT were analyzed.
METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed a total of 6731 otherwise healthy women (45-59 years old) of 15 cities in 11 Latin American countries. Participants were requested to fill out the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic data and items regarding the menopause and HT use.
RESULTS: The prevalence of current HT use was 12.5%. Oral HT (43.7%) was the most frequently used type of HT, followed by transdermal types (17.7%). The main factors related to the current use of HT included: positive perceptions regarding HT (odds ratio (OR) 11.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.41-14.13), being postmenopausal (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.75-4.36) and having a better socioeconomic level. A total of 48.8% of surveyed women had used HT in the past, but abandoned it due to symptom improvement or being unconcerned; fear of cancer or any other secondary effects were also reported but in less than 10%. Among women who had never used HT, 28% reported the lack of medical prescription as the main reason, followed by the absence of symptoms (27.8%). Among those reporting lack of prescription as the main reason for not using HT, 30.6% currently had severe menopausal symptoms (total MRS score > 16); 19.5% of women were using alternative 'natural' therapies, with 35.1% of them displaying severe menopausal symptoms as compared to a 22.5% observed among current HT users.
CONCLUSION: The use of HT has not regained the rates observed a decade ago. Positive perceptions regarding HT were related to a higher use. Lack of medical prescription was the main reason for not using HT among non-users, many of whom were currently displaying severe menopausal symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; MENOPAUSE; MENOPAUSE RATING SCALE; PERCEPTIONS; SYMPTOMS; USE

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24443950     DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2014.882305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Climacteric        ISSN: 1369-7137            Impact factor:   3.005


  3 in total

1.  Hysterectomy and incidence of depressive symptoms in midlife women: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Authors:  L Wilson; N Pandeya; J Byles; G Mishra
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  What is behind the fear of cancer during menopausal hormone therapy in China?

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Wei Wang; Ying Feng; Zhangyun Tan; Xiaomin Yang; Danhong Peng; Yinqing Zhao; Han Dong; Qingmei Zheng; Xiaoqin Zeng; Ying Zou; Aijun Sun
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Menopause in Latin America: Symptoms, attitudes, treatments and future directions in Costa Rica.

Authors:  T D Locklear; B J Doyle; A L Perez; S M Wicks; G B Mahady
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.