BACKGROUND: While there is consensus that significant extrathyroidal extension (ETE) (T4) should upstage a patient with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, the importance of minimal ETE (T3) remains controversial. Additionally, the importance of nodal metastases on prognosis has come under scrutiny. Recent publications highlight the importance of size, number of positive nodes, and, in particular, the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) as measures of disease aggressiveness. In this study, we examined whether ETE is a predictor of ENE. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2004 to March 2013. All node-positive patients who underwent total or completion thyroidectomy were included. Histologic features defined by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) protocol for thyroid carcinoma were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients qualified for review. Patients who were found to have ETE were 12 times more likely to have lymph nodes in the primary setting with ENE than patients with intrathyroidal primary tumors (p<0.000). After exclusion of all T4 cases (n=6), patients with minimal ETE were 13 times more likely to have ENE than those with no ETE (p<0.000). Twenty percent of microcarcinomas with ETE demonstrated ENE. CONCLUSION: We have found that the biology of the primary tumor is conferred to the lymph node in that the presence of ETE leads to a significantly higher incidence of ENE. Awareness of this relationship should be accounted for in the management of primary and recurrent lymph nodes. This study shows that minimal ETE is a significant predictor of ENE. Although long-term survival and recurrence follow-up is not available for the majority of patients in this series, the presence of ENE as a surrogate for more aggressive disease biology and its strong association with minimal ETE supports the upstaging of patients with minimal ETE.
BACKGROUND: While there is consensus that significant extrathyroidal extension (ETE) (T4) should upstage a patient with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, the importance of minimal ETE (T3) remains controversial. Additionally, the importance of nodal metastases on prognosis has come under scrutiny. Recent publications highlight the importance of size, number of positive nodes, and, in particular, the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) as measures of disease aggressiveness. In this study, we examined whether ETE is a predictor of ENE. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2004 to March 2013. All node-positive patients who underwent total or completion thyroidectomy were included. Histologic features defined by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) protocol for thyroid carcinoma were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients qualified for review. Patients who were found to have ETE were 12 times more likely to have lymph nodes in the primary setting with ENE than patients with intrathyroidal primary tumors (p<0.000). After exclusion of all T4 cases (n=6), patients with minimal ETE were 13 times more likely to have ENE than those with no ETE (p<0.000). Twenty percent of microcarcinomas with ETE demonstrated ENE. CONCLUSION: We have found that the biology of the primary tumor is conferred to the lymph node in that the presence of ETE leads to a significantly higher incidence of ENE. Awareness of this relationship should be accounted for in the management of primary and recurrent lymph nodes. This study shows that minimal ETE is a significant predictor of ENE. Although long-term survival and recurrence follow-up is not available for the majority of patients in this series, the presence of ENE as a surrogate for more aggressive disease biology and its strong association with minimal ETE supports the upstaging of patients with minimal ETE.
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: G Sapuppo; F Palermo; M Russo; M Tavarelli; R Masucci; S Squatrito; R Vigneri; G Pellegriti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jason B Clain; Saral Mehra; Sophie Scherl; Laura L Dos Reis; A Turk; Bruce M Wenig; Eliza H Dewey; Mark L Urken Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.943
Authors: Henry K Su; Bruce M Wenig; Grace C Haser; Meghan E Rowe; Sylvia L Asa; Zubair Baloch; Eugenie Du; William C Faquin; Giovanni Fellegara; Thomas Giordano; Ronald Ghossein; Virginia A LiVolsi; Ricardo Lloyd; Ozgur Mete; Umut Ozbek; Juan Rosai; Saul Suster; Lester D Thompson; Andrew T Turk; Mark L Urken Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.568